420.031
Wardship over adjudicated youth at youth correction facility; legal custody of
adjudicated youth.
(1) The granting of legal custody and guardianship over the adjudicated youth
to the Oregon Youth Authority does not terminate the juvenile court’s
jurisdiction over the adjudicated youth.
(2) Upon parole
of the adjudicated youth from a youth correction facility, the legal custody of
the adjudicated youth is vested in the parents of the adjudicated youth or
other person to whom the adjudicated youth is returned, subject to ORS 420.045
(3). [Formerly 420.015; 1969 c.679 §8; 1971 c.401 §99; 1995 c.422 §94; 2003
c.396 §141; 2021 c.489 §112]
420.035 [1985 c.500 §5; repealed by 1993
c.742 §82]
420.037 [1985 c.500 §6; repealed by 1993
c.742 §82]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1973–1983 · leading case:
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
· cites it 2× “5 Custody over the defendant after release appears *36 to have been in the defendant’s grandparents pursuant to a release agreement and ORS 420.031(2). 6 The state argues that because of the grandmother’s legal relationship to defendant and her responsibility for defendant’s…”
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Richardson, 508 P.2d 476 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).
“” Further, ORS 420.031 (1) provides: “The granting of legal custody and guardianship over the child’s person to the Children’s Services Division does not terminate the juvenile court’s wardship over the child.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 420.031(2) — 1 case
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
“5 Custody over the defendant after release appears *36 to have been in the defendant’s grandparents pursuant to a release agreement and ORS 420.031(2). 6 The state argues that because of the grandmother’s legal relationship to defendant and her responsibility for defendant’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.