Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 453.408 (2026)

Rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      453.408 Rules. (1) The Department of Revenue, in consultation with the State Fire Marshal, is authorized to establish those rules and procedures for the implementation and enforcement of ORS 453.396 to 453.414 that are consistent with its provisions and are considered necessary and appropriate.

      (2) The State Fire Marshal by rule may add persons or substances to or exempt persons or substances from liability for the fee imposed under ORS 453.396 to 453.414 to conform to the reporting requirements established by the State Fire Marshal under the Community Right to Know and Protection Act.

      (3) Before final adoption of initial rules to carry out the provisions of ORS 453.396 to 453.414 or subsequent amendment of the initial fee schedules established under ORS 453.398, the State Fire Marshal shall obtain prior approval of the fees by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services. The fees established under ORS 453.396 to 453.414 shall be within the budget authorized by the Legislative Assembly as that budget may be modified by the Emergency Board. The fees shall not exceed the cost of the program. [1989 c.833 §§127,131,134; 1991 c.703 §11; 2023 c.602 §8]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Gilliam Cnty. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 837 P.2d 965 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gilliam Cnty. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 837 P.2d 965 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). “450(l)(d); ORS 453.408(3); ORS 465.385(2)(b). 13 We also note that, even if we were to construe the language to imply that the Committee would submit EQC’s proposal to the Legislative Assembly, the statute would still establish a defective process, because all bills must…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 453.408(3) — 1 case
Gilliam Cnty. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 837 P.2d 965 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). “450(l)(d); ORS 453.408(3); ORS 465.385(2)(b). 13 We also note that, even if we were to construe the language to imply that the Committee would submit EQC’s proposal to the Legislative Assembly, the statute would still establish a defective process, because all bills must…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.