Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.057 (2026)

State preemption of local pesticide regulation

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      634.057 State preemption of local pesticide regulation. No city, town, county or other political subdivision of this state shall adopt or enforce any ordinance, rule or regulation regarding pesticide sale or use, including but not limited to:

      (1) Labeling;

      (2) Registration;

      (3) Notification of use;

      (4) Advertising and marketing;

      (5) Distribution;

      (6) Applicator training and certification;

      (7) Licensing;

      (8) Transportation;

      (9) Packaging;

      (10) Storage;

      (11) Disclosure of confidential information; or

      (12) Product composition. [1996 c.10 §6 (enacted in lieu of 634.009)]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2010 · leading case: Doe v. Medford Sch. Dist. 549C, 221 P.3d 787 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Medford Sch. Dist. 549C, 221 P.3d 787 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “003(25)(b) (“building or structure regulated under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code”); ORS 453.015(2) (“[c]ommon fireworks regulated under ORS 480.”
Advocates for Effective Reg. v. City of Eugene, 981 P.2d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “) It also bears emphasis that the list of what constitutes prohibited local interference with state regulation of “sale or use” of pesticides, although long, is not exhaustive.”
At&T Commc'ns of Pac. Nw., Inc. v. City of Eugene, 35 P.3d 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “136 (“Any local government or special district ordinance or regulation now in effect or subsequently adopted that makes a shooting range a nuisance or trespass or provides for its abatement * * * is invalid * * *.”
Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of Wilsonville, 228 P.3d 650 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “136 (“[a]ny local government * * * ordinance or regulation now in effect or subsequently adopted” with a particular effect “is invalid”); and ORS 634.057 (“No city, town, county or other political subdivision of this state shall adopt or enforce any ordinance, rule or regulation…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.057(2): 1 case
Advocates for Effective Reg. v. City of Eugene, 981 P.2d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “) It also bears emphasis that the list of what constitutes prohibited local interference with state regulation of “sale or use” of pesticides, although long, is not exhaustive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.