Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.475 (2026)

Application and construction of ORS 646.461 to 646.475; short title; effect of invalidity

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      646.475 Application and construction of ORS 646.461 to 646.475; short title; effect of invalidity. (1) ORS 646.461 to 646.475 shall be applied and construed to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 among states enacting them.

      (2) ORS 646.461 to 646.475 may be cited as the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.

      (3) If any provision of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 are severable. [1987 c.537 §§9,10,11]

 

      646.482 [1997 c.562 §1; 1999 c.81 §1; 2007 c.70 §281; renumbered 646A.460 in 2007]

 

      646.484 [1997 c.562 §2; renumbered 646A.462 in 2007]

 

      646.486 [1997 c.562 §3; renumbered 646A.464 in 2007]

 

      646.488 [1997 c.562 §4; renumbered 646A.466 in 2007]

 

      646.490 [1997 c.562 §5; renumbered 646A.468 in 2007]

 

      646.492 [1997 c.562 §6; renumbered 646A.470 in 2007]

 

      646.494 [1997 c.562 §7; renumbered 646A.472 in 2007]

 

      646.496 [1997 c.562 §8; renumbered 646A.474 in 2007]

 

      646.498 [1997 c.562 §9; 2001 c.542 §8; 2003 c.14 §392; renumbered 646A.476 in 2007]

 

      646.500 [2001 c.767 §1; renumbered 646A.500 in 2007]

 

      646.501 [2001 c.767 §2; renumbered 646A.502 in 2007]

 

      646.502 [2001 c.767 §3; renumbered 646A.504 in 2007]

 

      646.503 [2001 c.767 §§4,8; renumbered 646A.506 in 2007]

 

      646.504 [2001 c.767 §§5,9; renumbered 646A.508 in 2007]

 

      646.505 [2001 c.767 §6; renumbered 646A.510 in 2007]

 

      646.506 [2001 c.767 §7; renumbered 646A.512 in 2007]

 

      646.507 [2001 c.767 §10; renumbered 646A.514 in 2007]

 

      646.510 [Repealed by 1953 c.391 §2]

 

PRODUCERS’ COOPERATIVE BARGAINING ASSOCIATIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC, 529 P.3d 939 (Or. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC, 529 P.3d 939 (Or. 2023). “, ORS 646.475(1) (stating that the Uniform Trade Secrets Act “shall be applied and construed * * * to make uniform the law * * * among states enacting [the act]”).”
Pelican Bay Forest Prods., Inc. v. W. Timber Prods., Inc., 443 P.3d 651 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “…purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 among states enacting them." ORS 646.475(1).”
State Ex Rel. Sports Mgmt. News, Inc. v. Nachtigal, 921 P.2d 1304 (Or. 1996). “ORS 646.475(3) provides that the various provisions of ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.475(1) — 2 cases
State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC, 529 P.3d 939 (Or. 2023). “, ORS 646.475(1) (stating that the Uniform Trade Secrets Act “shall be applied and construed * * * to make uniform the law * * * among states enacting [the act]”).”
Pelican Bay Forest Prods., Inc. v. W. Timber Prods., Inc., 443 P.3d 651 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “…purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 among states enacting them." ORS 646.475(1).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.475(2) — 1 case
Pelican Bay Forest Prods., Inc. v. W. Timber Prods., Inc., 443 P.3d 651 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “…purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of ORS 646.461 to 646.475 among states enacting them." ORS 646.475(1).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.475(3) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Sports Mgmt. News, Inc. v. Nachtigal, 921 P.2d 1304 (Or. 1996). “ORS 646.475(3) provides that the various provisions of ORS 646.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.