Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.646 (2026)

Loss of license or franchise by person violating injunction

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

646.646 Loss of license or franchise by person violating injunction. Upon petition by the prosecuting attorney, the court may, in its discretion, order the dissolution or suspension or forfeiture of the license or franchise of any person who violates the terms of any injunction issued under ORS 646.632. [1971 c.744 §18]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2001 · leading case: Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc., 17 P.3d 473 (Or. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc., 17 P.3d 473 (Or. 2001). “Although the UTPA also authorizes lesser sanctions, we agree with plaintiff that a regulatory scheme of sanctions that includes interruption or closure of business operations provides sufficient notice to a business defendant that its violation of the law could have serious…”

Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc., 965 P.2d 440 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “646, forfeiture can occur only if there is a violation of an injunction that has issued pursuant to ORS 646.632, restraining a person from engaging in an unlawful trade practice.”

Weigel v. Ron Tonkin Chevrolet Co., 690 P.2d 488 (Or. 1984). “642, and possible loss of licenses and franchises, ORS 646.646. The civil action authorized by ORS 646.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.