Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 662.050 (2026)

Specific acts that are not enjoinable

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

662.050 Specific acts that are not enjoinable. No court, nor any judge thereof, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of any labor dispute to prohibit any person or persons participating or interested in such dispute from doing, whether singly or in concert, any of the following acts:

(1) Ceasing or refusing to perform any work or to remain in any relation of employment.

(2) Becoming or remaining a member of any labor organization or of any employer organization, regardless of any undertaking or promise, as is described in ORS 662.030.

(3) Paying or giving to, or withholding from, any person participating or interested in such labor dispute, any strike or unemployment benefits or insurance, or other moneys or things of value.

(4) By all lawful means aiding any person participating or interested in any labor dispute who is being proceeded against in, or is prosecuting, any action or suit in any court of the United States or of any state.

(5) Giving publicity to the existence of, or facts involved in, any labor dispute, whether by advertising, speaking, patrolling or by any other method not involving fraud or violence or intimidation.

(6) Assembling peaceably to act or to organize to act in promotion of their interests in a labor dispute.

(7) Advising or notifying any person of any intention to do any of the acts specified in subsections (1) to (6) of this section.

(8) Agreeing with other persons to do or not to do any of the acts specified in subsections (1) to (7) of this section.

(9) Advising, urging or otherwise causing or inducing without fraud or violence or intimidation, the acts specified in subsections (1) to (8) of this section, regardless of any undertaking or promise, as is described in ORS 662.030.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1957–2015 · leading case: Louisiana-Pac. Corp. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers, Local No. 2949, 679 P.2d 289 (Or. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Louisiana-Pac. Corp. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers, Local No. 2949, 679 P.2d 289 (Or. 1984). · cites it 4× “” ORS 662.050. *541 Acting in concert is expressly protected under ORS 662.”

Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990). “Under ORS 662.050(5), no court has the jurisdiction to enjoin the “giving publicity to the existence of, or facts involved in, any labor dispute, whether by advertising, speaking, patrolling or by any other method not involving fraud or violence or intimidation.”

Campola v. Zekan, 362 P.3d 1205 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “755(1)(a) and ORS 662.050” and that “[t]he Circuit Court erred in denying Respondent his statutory right to ‘the opportunity to show cause why a court’s stalking protective order should not be issued.”

Div. No. 757 of the Amalgamated Transit Union v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp., 704 P.2d 1149 (Or. 1985). · cites it 3× “050 provides that “[n]o court, nor any judge thereof, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of any labor dispute” arising from nine specific circumstances.”

Loder Bros. v. Lodge 1506 Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists, 306 P.2d 411 (Or. 1957). · cites it 2× “ORS 662.050 is a part of what we familiarly call the “Little LaG-uardia Act.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 662.050(5) — 2 cases

Louisiana-Pac. Corp. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers, Local No. 2949, 679 P.2d 289 (Or. 1984). “” ORS 662.050. *541 Acting in concert is expressly protected under ORS 662.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.