Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.200 (2026)

Disciplinary procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      677.200 Disciplinary procedure. Except as provided in ORS 677.202 or 677.205 (1)(a), any proceeding for disciplinary action of a licensee licensed under this chapter shall be substantially in accord with the following procedure:

      (1) A written complaint of some person, not excluding members or employees of the Oregon Medical Board, shall be verified and filed with the board.

      (2) A hearing shall be given to the accused in accordance with ORS chapter 183 as a contested case. [Amended by 1957 c.681 §6; 1961 c.400 §6; 1967 c.470 §31; 1971 c.734 §118; 1983 c.486 §23; 1989 c.830 §11]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “That statute provides that: "(1) Any information provided to the board pursuant to ORS 677.200, 677.205 or 677.410 to 677.425 is confidential and shall not be subject to public disclosure, nor shall it be admissible as evidence in any judicial proceeding.”
Sachdev v. Or. Med. Bd., 426 P.3d 118 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “medicine or podiatry; "(b) Willful performance of any surgical or medical treatment which is contrary to acceptable medical standards; and "(c) Willful and repeated ordering or performance of unnecessary laboratory tests or radiologic studies; administration of unnecessary…”
Anderson v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 770 P.2d 947 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “1 ORS 677.200(2) requires the Board to conduct revocation and suspension proceedings in accordance with ORS 183.”
Gallant v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 974 P.2d 814 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “The first question we address is whether the Board correctly applied the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof in determining whether petitioner’s conduct violated ORS 677.”
Stalder v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 588 P.2d 659 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 6× “The hearing will be held pursuant to the authority of ORS 677.200.’,: 1 The only evidence presented against petitioner at the hearing concerned the alleged homosexual advance toward the patient’s husband.”
Murphy v. Oregon Med. Bd., 348 P.3d 1173 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “ORS 677.200. That statute provides, in part: “(1) The Legislative Assembly finds that persons affected by actions taken by state agencies have a right to be informed of their rights and remedies with respect to the actions.”
Campbell v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 535 P.2d 96 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 3× “202(1) provides: “Subsections (1) and (2) of ORS 677.200 do not apply in cases wherein: “(1) The board has refused to accept an application for licensing or has denied licensing to a person applying for a license to practice medicine in this state.”
Thomas v. Harder (D. Or. 2023). · cites it 9× “205 requires that the OMB may only temporarily suspend a license without a hearing if it is done “simultaneously with the commencement of proceedings under ORS 677.200.” The Court declines to adopt the portion of the F&R discussing ORS §§ 677.”
Hawkins v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 542 P.2d 152 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “The committee filed a report with the Board stating that petitioner was incompetent to practice medicine and thereafter a hearing was conducted under ORS 677.200, at which the members of the examination committee testified with regard to petitioner’s performance on the…”
Bennett v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 570 P.2d 986 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “ORS 677.200, which governs hearings on the suspension or revocation of medical licenses, provides that such hearings "shall be given * * * in accordance with ORS 183.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.200(1) — 2 cases
Stalder v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 588 P.2d 659 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “The hearing will be held pursuant to the authority of ORS 677.200.’,: 1 The only evidence presented against petitioner at the hearing concerned the alleged homosexual advance toward the patient’s husband.”
Thomas v. Harder (D. Or. 2023). “205 requires that the OMB may only temporarily suspend a license without a hearing if it is done “simultaneously with the commencement of proceedings under ORS 677.200.” The Court declines to adopt the portion of the F&R discussing ORS §§ 677.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.200(2) — 1 case
Anderson v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 770 P.2d 947 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “1 ORS 677.200(2) requires the Board to conduct revocation and suspension proceedings in accordance with ORS 183.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.200(3) — 3 cases
Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “That statute provides that: "(1) Any information provided to the board pursuant to ORS 677.200, 677.205 or 677.410 to 677.425 is confidential and shall not be subject to public disclosure, nor shall it be admissible as evidence in any judicial proceeding.”
Stalder v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 588 P.2d 659 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “The hearing will be held pursuant to the authority of ORS 677.200.’,: 1 The only evidence presented against petitioner at the hearing concerned the alleged homosexual advance toward the patient’s husband.”
Campbell v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 535 P.2d 96 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). “202(1) provides: “Subsections (1) and (2) of ORS 677.200 do not apply in cases wherein: “(1) The board has refused to accept an application for licensing or has denied licensing to a person applying for a license to practice medicine in this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.