Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 742.222 (2026)

Waiver provisions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      742.222 Waiver provisions. A fire insurance policy shall contain a provision as follows: “No permission affecting this insurance shall exist, or waiver of any provision be valid, unless granted herein or expressed in writing added hereto. No provision, stipulation or forfeiture shall be held to be waived by any requirement or proceeding on the part of this company relating to appraisal or to any examination provided for herein.” [Formerly 743.633]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: Moore v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins., 855 P.2d 626 (Or. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Moore v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins., 855 P.2d 626 (Or. 1993). · cites it 13× “222, which provides: “A fire insurance policy shall contain a provision as follows: ‘No permission affecting this insurance shall exist, or waiver of any provision be valid, unless granted herein or expressed in writing added hereto. No provision, stipulation or forfeiture shall…”
Kabban v. MacKin, 801 P.2d 883 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “633 (since renumbered ORS 742.222), which requires that a fire insurance policy contain this language: “No permission affecting this insurance shall exist, or waiver of any provision be valid, unless granted herein or expressed in writing added hereto.”
Moore v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins., 840 P.2d 1320 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 6× “” In this case, the extent of coverage is not in issue. What is in issue is whether plaintiff complied with the time requirement in the policy for filing a claim in court for a covered loss.”
Moore v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins., 833 P.2d 1310 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). “” See ORS 742.222. 3 In Fisher , the court said: “ ‘Parties to a contract can not, even by an express provision in that contract, deprive themselves of the power to alter or vary or discharge it by subsequent agreement.”
Dumas (D. Or. 2026). · cites it 4× “E.g., Sturm Decl. Ex. 4 at 1 (February 4, 2022), Ex.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.