Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2705 (2026)
Recklessly endangering another person.
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 2705. Recklessly endangering another person.
A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury.
Cross References. Section 2705 is referred to in sections 2709.1, 2711 of this title; sections 5329, 6711 of Title 23 (Domestic Relations).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 762
cases (174 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Joan Kedra v. Richard Schroeter, 876 F.3d 424 (3rd Cir. 2017).
Joan Kedra v. Richard Schroeter, 876 F.3d 424 (3rd Cir. 2017). “another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury,” 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2705 , with the mental state of “conscious[] disregard[] [of] a substantial and unjustifiable risk” of serious harm, 18 Pa.”
Dwayne Harvard v. Christopher Cesnalis, 973 F.3d 190 (3rd Cir. 2020). “The blood test later returned negative results for all tested drugs and indicated that Harvard’s BAC was 0.016%. Cesnalis filed an affidavit of probable cause with the magistrate judge, charging Harvard with: (1) recklessly endangering another person ( 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Johnson, W., Aplt, 139 A.3d 1257 (Pa. 2016). “§ 907, and recklessly endangering another person, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705. Those charges concerned the June 10, 1993 homicide of John McDonald on a street in Philadelphia.”
Commonwealth v. Lawton, 414 A.2d 658 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979). “[2] Post-trial motions were denied and appellant now asserts three assignments of error in the trial court: (1) that he was improperly tried in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and should have been tried in the Philadelphia Municipal Court; (2) that the evidence…”
Commonwealth v. Antidormi, 84 A.3d 736 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “The standard sentencing guidelines for those crimes were six to twelve months’ incarceration under section 2705, six to ten months’ incarceration under subsection 3304(b), and forty-two to fifty-four months’ incarceration under subsection 6105(a)(1).”
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 835 A.2d 720 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003). “§ 5503(a)(1)), and two counts each of REAP (18 Pa.C.S. § 2705), terroristic threats (18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Holguin, 385 A.2d 1346 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978). “Appellant next contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for recklessly endangering another person pursuant to 18 Pa. C.S. § 2705. This section provides: “A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which…”
Commonwealth v. Bullock, 170 A.3d 1109 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705. “Reckless endangerment is a lesser included offense of [A]ggravated [Assault and where the evidence is sufficient to support a claim of [Aggravated [A]s-sault it is also sufficient to support a claim of [REAP].”
Com. v. James, B., 268 A.3d 461 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). “§2701(a)(1)), recklessly endangering another person (REAP) (18 Pa.C.S. § 2705), and discharging a firearm into an occupied structure (18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Dantzler, 135 A.3d 1109 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “§ 2701(a)(1) (simple assault); 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705 (REAP). Finally, the Commonwealth had to provide sufficient prima facie evidence that Appellee conspired to possess an instrument of crime with intent to employ it criminally.”
Commonwealth v. Spotz, 896 A.2d 1191 (Pa. 2006). “§ 3702. [12] 18 Pa.C.S. § 3701. [13] 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Dillon, 925 A.2d 131 (Pa. 2007). “[10] 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705. [11] 18 Pa.C.S. § 4304.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2705(a) — 1 case
Com. v. Harris, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2705(a)(5) — 1 case
In the Interest of: A.B., Appeal of: A.B. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.