Pa. Cons. Stat. » 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CRIMES AND OFFENSES) / Chapter 41

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4114

 Securing execution of documents by deception.

Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 4114.  Securing execution of documents by deception.

A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Wallace
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Wallace (2014) pa “Chief Justice CASTILLE files a concurring opinion in which Justice EAKIN joins. Justice SAYLOR flies a concurring opinion.”
Luzerne County Retirement Board v. Seacrist (2010) pacommwct · cites it 2× “Securing Execution of Documents by Deceptions (18 Pa.C.S. § 4114); 2. Criminal Conspiracy to Commit Securing Execution of Documents by Deception (18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Smalis (1991) pa · cites it 2× “[5] 18 Pa.C.S. § 4114. [6] The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that "No person shall be .”
Com. v. Wilkins Sr., A. (2021) pasuperct · cites it 2× “§ 5101; Securing Execution of Documents by Deception, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4114;5 Official ____________________________________________ function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act[.”
Commonwealth v. Rubin (2011) pactcompllawren · cites it 2× “§3925 §§A); and secure execution of documents by deception (18 Pa.C.S. §4114), and contends that there is insufficient evidence as a matter of law to sustain any of the three charges.”
Com. v. Davis, B. (2016) pasuperct “8 18 Pa. C.S. § 4114. These charges were withdrawn prior to trial.”
Com. v. Harris, R. (2016) pasuperct “11 18 Pa. C.S. § 4114. 12 See N.T. 7/14/08 at 15-17.”
Com. v. Neely, M. (2020) pasuperct “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 4114. Appellant argues that the Commonwealth did not present evidence to establish that she deceived the Victim thereby causing him to execute an instrument affecting his pecuniary interest.”
T. White v. DOC, Z. Moslak, Office of the Chief Hearing Examiner (2025) pacommwct “Specifically, Inmate asserts that he was improperly moved to the Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) L-5 Housing Unit, and charged with a misconduct, based on the illegal actions of Lieutenant Martin (Officer), a corrections officer at SCI Houtzdale.”
Com. v. Robinson, S. (2025) pasuperct “§ 5101; 18 Pa.C.S. § 4114; 18 § 4911(a)(1)(2)(3); and 18 Pa.”
In re Anonymous Nos. 61 D.B. 85 & 62 D.B. 81 (1989) pa · cites it 2× “[5]: Execution of documents by deception in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. §4114. Bill no. [6]: Criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 Pa.”
In re Anonymous No. 74 D.B. 93 (1995) pa “§4911, 18 Pa.C.S. §4114, and 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 is a conviction under Rule 214(d), Pa.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.