Pa. Cons. Stat. » 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CRIMES AND OFFENSES) / Chapter 63
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4 (2026)

 Restriction of operating privileges (Repealed).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 6310.4.  Restriction of operating privileges (Repealed).

 

2018 Repeal.  Section 6310.4 was repealed October 24, 2018, P.L.659, No.95, effective in 180 days.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2021 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Strunk, 582 A.2d 1326 (Pa. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Strunk, 582 A.2d 1326 (Pa. 1990). · cites it 4× “The trial court suspended the defendant's operating privileges for a period of 90 days, pursuant to 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 6310.4 (Purdon Supp.”
Duffey v. Dept. of Transp., 607 A.2d 815 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992). · cites it 6× “4 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. [2] By official notice dated *283 July 24, 1990, DOT notified Duffey that his driving privileges were to be suspended for a period of ninety days.”
Johnson v. State Hearing Exam'r's Off., 838 P.2d 158 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “[16] The Pennsylvania statutory process, 18 Pa. Cons.Stat.Ann. § 6310.4 (Purdon Supp.”
Frantz v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 649 A.2d 148 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). · cites it 6× “4 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 1 Wé reverse. *38 On July 26, 1991, Frantz was cited for a violation of Section 6308 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Com. of PA, Ins. Dep't, T.D. Miller, Acting Ins. Comm'r, 124 A.3d 775 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). · cites it 7× “Although 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4 does not permit an insurer to “cancel or refuse to renew an automobile *778 insurance policy on account of a suspension under this section,” State Farm argues that the prohibition does not apply to a refusal to write.”
Smay v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 940 A.2d 540 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). · cites it 4× “However, Section 1532(d) of the Vehicle Code does not require the use of the DL-21C form but, instead, states that courts “may” use the same form used to submit the order of suspension under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 4 Therefore, Judge Swope’s remand order requiring underage drinking…”
McCracken v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 660 A.2d 700 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). · cites it 8× “As a result, DOT imposed a 90 day suspension pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 2 On December 18, 1993, McCracken was charged with another violation of 18 Pa.”
Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Tarnopolski, 626 A.2d 138 (Pa. 1993). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 1 Tarnopolski consulted a lawyer who advised the district justice’s office that the payment was not authorized, and that Tarnopolski wished to reinstate her not guilty plea and proceed with a hearing on the merits.”
Krall v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 682 A.2d 63 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “4 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4, governs the restriction of operating privileges.”
Levinson v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 926 A.2d 1284 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007). “4(a) of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4(a), the Magisterial District Justice certified to DOT that Licensee was convicted of underage drinking and ordered DOT to suspend Licensee’s operating privileges.”
Commonwealth v. Elliott, 599 A.2d 1335 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4, Restriction of operating privileges, provides: (a) General rule.”
Poborski v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 964 A.2d 66 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009). “4 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4); McDevitt (acceptance of A.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4(a) — 12 cases
Levinson v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 926 A.2d 1284 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007). “4(a) of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4(a), the Magisterial District Justice certified to DOT that Licensee was convicted of underage drinking and ordered DOT to suspend Licensee’s operating privileges.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Com. of PA, Ins. Dep't, T.D. Miller, Acting Ins. Comm'r, 124 A.3d 775 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “Although 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4 does not permit an insurer to “cancel or refuse to renew an automobile *778 insurance policy on account of a suspension under this section,” State Farm argues that the prohibition does not apply to a refusal to write.”
Smay v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 940 A.2d 540 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). “However, Section 1532(d) of the Vehicle Code does not require the use of the DL-21C form but, instead, states that courts “may” use the same form used to submit the order of suspension under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 4 Therefore, Judge Swope’s remand order requiring underage drinking…”
Commonwealth v. Hruska, 625 A.2d 1339 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1993).
McCracken v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 660 A.2d 700 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “As a result, DOT imposed a 90 day suspension pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 2 On December 18, 1993, McCracken was charged with another violation of 18 Pa.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4(b) — 2 cases
Frantz v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 649 A.2d 148 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). “4 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4. 1 Wé reverse. *38 On July 26, 1991, Frantz was cited for a violation of Section 6308 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.”
Smith v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Transp., 740 A.2d 284 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4(b)(1) — 2 cases
Hockenberry v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 972 A.2d 97 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
Hockenberry v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., 972 A.2d 97 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4(c) — 3 cases
Hockenberry v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 972 A.2d 97 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
Smith v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Transp., 740 A.2d 284 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).
Hockenberry v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., 972 A.2d 97 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6310.4(d) — 2 cases
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Com. of PA, Ins. Dep't, T.D. Miller, Acting Ins. Comm'r, 124 A.3d 775 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “Although 18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.4 does not permit an insurer to “cancel or refuse to renew an automobile *778 insurance policy on account of a suspension under this section,” State Farm argues that the prohibition does not apply to a refusal to write.”
Erie Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Ins., 684 A.2d 1115 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.