Pa. Cons. Stat. » 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CRIMES AND OFFENSES) / Chapter 63
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318 (2026)

 Unlawful contact with minor.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 6318.  Unlawful contact with minor.

(a)  Offense defined.--A person commits an offense if the person is intentionally in contact with a minor, or a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of duties who has assumed the identity of a minor or of another individual having direct contact with children, as defined under 23 Pa.C.S. § 6303(a) (relating to definitions), for the purpose of engaging in an activity prohibited under any of the following provisions under this title, and either the person initiating the contact or the person being contacted is within this Commonwealth:

(1)  (Deleted by amendment).

(1.1)  Any of the offenses enumerated in Chapter 30 (relating to human trafficking), if the activity involved sexual servitude and the victim was a minor.

(1.2)  Any of the offenses enumerated in Chapter 31 (relating to sexual offenses).

(1.3)  Incest as defined in section 4302(b) (relating to incest).

(1.4)  Endangering welfare of children as defined in section 4304(a)(1) (relating to endangering welfare of children), if the activity involved sexual contact with the minor.

(2)  Open lewdness as defined in section 5901 (relating to open lewdness).

(3)  Prostitution as defined in section 5902 (relating to prostitution and related offenses).

(4)  Obscene and other sexual materials and performances as defined in section 5903 (relating to obscene and other sexual materials and performances).

(4.1)  Corruption of minors as defined in section 6301(a)(1)(i) (relating to corruption of minors), if the activity involved sexual contact with the minor.

(4.2)  Corruption of minors as defined in section 6301(a)(1)(ii).

(5)  Sexual abuse of children as defined in section 6312 (relating to sexual abuse of children).

(6)  Sexual exploitation of children as defined in section 6320 (relating to sexual exploitation of children).

(7)  An attempt, solicitation or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses in this subsection.

(b)  Grading.--A violation of subsection (a) is:

(1)  an offense of the same grade and degree as the most serious underlying offense in subsection (a) for which the defendant contacted the minor; or

(2)  a felony of the third degree;

whichever is greater.

(b.1)  Concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute.--The Attorney General shall have concurrent prosecutorial jurisdiction with the district attorney for violations under this section and any crime arising out of the activity prohibited by this section when the person charged with a violation of this section contacts a minor through the use of a computer, computer system or computer network. No person charged with a violation of this section by the Attorney General shall have standing to challenge the authority of the Attorney General to prosecute the case, and, if any such challenge is made, the challenge shall be dismissed and no relief shall be available in the courts of this Commonwealth to the person making the challenge.

(c)  Definitions.--As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:

"Computer."  An electronic, magnetic, optical, hydraulic, organic or other high-speed data processing device or system which performs logic, arithmetic or memory functions and includes all input, output, processing, storage, software or communication facilities which are connected or related to the device in a computer system or computer network.

"Computer network."  The interconnection of two or more computers through the usage of satellite, microwave, line or other communication medium.

"Computer system."  A set of related, connected or unconnected computer equipment, devices and software.

"Contacts."  Direct or indirect contact or communication by any means, method or device, including contact or communication in person or through an agent or agency, through any print medium, the mails, a common carrier or communication common carrier, any electronic communication system and any telecommunications, wire, computer or radio communications device or system.

"Minor."  An individual under 18 years of age.

(Dec. 19, 1997, P.L.615, No.62, eff. imd.; Nov. 20, 2002, P.L.1104, No.134, eff. 60 days; Dec. 9, 2002, P.L.1391, No.172, eff. 60 days; Nov. 29, 2006, P.L.1567, No.178, eff. Jan. 1, 2007; Dec. 14, 2023, P.L.366, No.39, eff. 60 days; June 27, 2025, P.L.6, No.5, eff. 60 days)

 

2025 Amendment.  Act 5 amended subsec. (a).

2006 Amendment.  See the preamble to Act 178 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to legislative intent.

Cross References.  Section 6318 is referred to in sections 3104, 5708, 5743.1 of this title; sections 5329, 6303, 6702 of Title 23 (Domestic Relations); sections 5920, 5985.1, 5993, 62A03, 9718.1, 9799.14, 9799.55 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure); section 3113 of Title 63 (Professions and Occupations (State Licensed)).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 276 cases (93 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010). · cites it 37× “In this appeal by allowance, we consider the proper grading of a conviction for attempted unlawful contact with a minor, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, when the defendant was acquitted of all other charged offenses.”
Commonwealth v. Morgan, 913 A.2d 906 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006). · cites it 10× “: ¶ 1 Appellant, Jason Morgan, appeals from the judgment of sentence of nine to eighteen months imprisonment imposed after a jury convicted him of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, unlawful contact with a minor.”
Commonwealth v. Miller, 35 A.3d 1206 (Pa. 2012). · cites it 6× “—A person commits an offense if he is intentionally in contact with a minor for the purpose of engaging in an activity prohibited under any of the following, and either the person initiating or the person being contacted is within this Commonwealth: (1) Any of the offenses…”
Commonwealth v. Weimer, 167 A.3d 78 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a). See Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, M., Aplt., 168 A.3d 137 (Pa. 2017). · cites it 4× “OPINION JUSTICE BAER This appeal requires the Court to determine the proper grading for sentencing of a defendant’s conviction for unlawful con *138 tact with a minor, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, 1 when the grading is based on the offense for which the defendant contacted the minor, here…”
Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 4× “§ 6312(d), or subsection (a)(5) of the unlawful contact with a minor statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, because both crimes require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the utilization of a “computer depiction” of a child for illicit purposes.”
A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 143 A.3d 896 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 2× “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318 (relating to unlawful contact with minor).”
Magdiel Mondragon-Gonzalez v. Attorney Gen. United States, 884 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2018). · cites it 4× “The BIA determined that Mondragon-Gonzalez's conviction of unlawful contact with a minor in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318 (a)(5) is a "crime of child abuse" constituting grounds for removal pursuant to 8 U.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, 139 A.3d 244 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the express statutory language, a violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a) is the same grade as the most serious underlying offense for which the defendant attempted contact with the minor, or a first-degree misdemeanor, whichever is greater.”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shower, W., 147 A.3d 517 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 2× “Grace agreed to plead guilty to corruption of minors and indecent assault.”
Commonwealth v. Leatherby, 116 A.3d 73 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “1 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a)(1). 2 18 Pa.C.S. § 4304(a).”
Commonwealth v. Gehris, 54 A.3d 862 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). · cites it 5× “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318 (relating to unlawful contact with minor).”
Show all 276 citing cases →
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(1) — 4 cases
Com. v. Hawchar, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Com. v. Hawchar, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Com. v. Keener, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Baker-Myers, J. (Pa. 2021).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(A)(1) — 3 cases
Com. v. Markelwitz, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Com. v. Geier, E., Jr. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Com. v. Jackson, C. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(A)(4) — 1 case
Com. v. Brooke, A., Jr. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(A)(5) — 1 case
Com. v. Markelwitz, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(A)(l) — 1 case
Com. v. Cloward, M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a) — 33 cases
Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010). “In this appeal by allowance, we consider the proper grading of a conviction for attempted unlawful contact with a minor, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, when the defendant was acquitted of all other charged offenses.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, 139 A.3d 244 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “Pursuant to the express statutory language, a violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a) is the same grade as the most serious underlying offense for which the defendant attempted contact with the minor, or a first-degree misdemeanor, whichever is greater.”
Commonwealth v. Miller, 35 A.3d 1206 (Pa. 2012). “—A person commits an offense if he is intentionally in contact with a minor for the purpose of engaging in an activity prohibited under any of the following, and either the person initiating or the person being contacted is within this Commonwealth: (1) Any of the offenses…”
Commonwealth v. Weimer, 167 A.3d 78 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a). See Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Velez, 51 A.3d 260 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(1) — 152 cases
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shower, W., 147 A.3d 517 (Pa. 2016). “Grace agreed to plead guilty to corruption of minors and indecent assault.”
Commonwealth v. Leatherby, 116 A.3d 73 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). “1 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a)(1). 2 18 Pa.C.S. § 4304(a).”
Commonwealth v. Walker, 139 A.3d 225 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Commonwealth v. McCauley, 199 A.3d 947 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
Dougherty v. Pa. State Police of Pa., 138 A.3d 152 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(1)(i) — 1 case
Com. v. Hart, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(2) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Tiffany, 926 A.2d 503 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
Com. v. Lewis, T. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Com. v. Gonzales, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
Com. v. Crenshaw, E. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Commonwealth v. Kalwaic, 9 Pa. D. & C.5th 535 (2009).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(4) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 6312(d), or subsection (a)(5) of the unlawful contact with a minor statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, because both crimes require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the utilization of a “computer depiction” of a child for illicit purposes.”
Douglas v. Brookville Area Sch. Dist., 836 F. Supp. 2d 329 (W.D. Pa. 2011).
Com. v. Alston, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(5) — 9 cases
A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 87 A.3d 914 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014).
Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 6312(d), or subsection (a)(5) of the unlawful contact with a minor statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, because both crimes require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the utilization of a “computer depiction” of a child for illicit purposes.”
Commonwealth v. Gehris, 54 A.3d 862 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318 (relating to unlawful contact with minor).”
Com. v. Ricci, M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Com. v. Affronti, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(6) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Weimer, 167 A.3d 78 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a). See Commonwealth v.”
Com. v. Glasgow, T. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(I) — 1 case
Com. v. S., R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(i) — 1 case
Com. v. O'Brian, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(a)(l) — 6 cases
Commonwealth v. Tiffany, 926 A.2d 503 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
Com. v. Daniels, M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
Com. v. Bailey, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Com. v. Thompson, C. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Com. v. Bricker, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(b) — 8 cases
Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010). “In this appeal by allowance, we consider the proper grading of a conviction for attempted unlawful contact with a minor, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, when the defendant was acquitted of all other charged offenses.”
Commonwealth v. Weimer, 167 A.3d 78 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a). See Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, 139 A.3d 244 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “Pursuant to the express statutory language, a violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318(a) is the same grade as the most serious underlying offense for which the defendant attempted contact with the minor, or a first-degree misdemeanor, whichever is greater.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, M., Aplt., 168 A.3d 137 (Pa. 2017). “OPINION JUSTICE BAER This appeal requires the Court to determine the proper grading for sentencing of a defendant’s conviction for unlawful con *138 tact with a minor, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, 1 when the grading is based on the offense for which the defendant contacted the minor, here…”
Com. v. Reyes, T., 2025 Pa. Super. 284 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(b)(1) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010). “In this appeal by allowance, we consider the proper grading of a conviction for attempted unlawful contact with a minor, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, when the defendant was acquitted of all other charged offenses.”
Commonwealth v. Aikens, M., Aplt., 168 A.3d 137 (Pa. 2017). “OPINION JUSTICE BAER This appeal requires the Court to determine the proper grading for sentencing of a defendant’s conviction for unlawful con *138 tact with a minor, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, 1 when the grading is based on the offense for which the defendant contacted the minor, here…”
Com. v. Williams, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(b)(2) — 4 cases
Commonwealth v. Reed, 9 A.3d 1138 (Pa. 2010). “In this appeal by allowance, we consider the proper grading of a conviction for attempted unlawful contact with a minor, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, when the defendant was acquitted of all other charged offenses.”
Com. v. J., R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Com. v. Bernal, G. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
Com. v. Krumm, E. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(c) — 19 cases
Commonwealth v. Velez, 51 A.3d 260 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012).
Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 6312(d), or subsection (a)(5) of the unlawful contact with a minor statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, because both crimes require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the utilization of a “computer depiction” of a child for illicit purposes.”
Commonwealth of PA v. One (1) 1992 Volkswagen Passat -- Appeal of: J. Kokinda (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018).
Commonwealth v. Strunk, M., Aplt. (Pa. 2024).
Com. v. Shlewiet, B. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6318(i) — 1 case
Com. v. Grayson, P. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.