18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9111
Duties of criminal justice agencies.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
SUBCHAPTER B
COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY
Sec.
9111. Duties of criminal justice agencies.
9112. Mandatory fingerprinting.
9113. Disposition reporting by criminal justice agencies.
9114. Correction of inaccurate information.
Cross References. Subchapter B is referred to in section 9104 of this title.
§ 9111. Duties of criminal justice agencies.
It shall be the duty of every criminal justice agency within the Commonwealth to maintain complete and accurate criminal history record information and to report such information at such times and in such manner as required by the provisions of this chapter or other applicable statutes.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: State Police v. Court of Common Pleas
State Police v. Court of Common Pleas (1992)
“If the State Police had received notice of the expungement petition it would have opposed the petition, based on its belief that (1) there is no authority which permits the State Police to expunge criminal conviction records in this situation and (2) the State Police have a duty…”
Schneider v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation (2002)
“The State Police challenged the expungement order to avoid a contempt of court order and argued that it had an independent mandate under 18 Pa.C.S. § 9111 to collect and maintain complete and accurate criminal history record information.”
Haron v. Pennsylvania State Police (2017)
“CHRIA, 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 9111, 9114. Harón reiterates his allegation that PSP’s violations were willful and deliberate.”
Kearney v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs (2017)
“section 9111 of the Criminal History Record Information Act (CHRIA), 18 Pa.C.S. § 9111 (defining “expunge,” in one part, as “[t]o remove information so that there is no trace or indication that such information existed.”
Hoffman v. Borough of Macungie (2013)
“” 8 18 Pa.C.S. § 9111. Such information is maintained in a central repository for the use of criminal justice agencies.”
Pennsylvania State Police v. Rush (2001)
“” See Section 9111 of CHRIA, 18 Pa. C.S. § 9111. 10 . In Bucks County, we noted that Section 9122(f) of CHRIA, 18 Pa.”
Pa. State Police v. Sama (2019)
“This Court concluded that PSP maintained an incorrect criminal history record with respect to the petitioner in violation of Section 9111 of CHRIA, 18 Pa. C.S. § 9111, which resulted in the wrongful denial of his constitutional right to purchase a firearm for a period of several…”
Deyo v. Eck (2023)
“§ 12005 (powers of police officers to arrest); 18 Pa. C.S. § 9111 (duties of criminal justice agencies); 18 Pa.”
M. Haron v. PSP (2017)
“sently before this Court is the application of Michael Haron (Haron) for summary relief in relation to a petition for review he filed against the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) alleging that the PSP willfully failed to completely and accurately maintain his criminal history…”
Mitman v. County Commissioners (1980)
“The CHRI Act defines criminal history record information as, in pertinent part, “[information collected by criminal justice agencies concerning individuals, and arising from the initiation of a criminal proceeding, consisting of identifiable descriptions, dates and notations of…”
C. O'Neal v. Bedford County and C. Fetter, as Bedford County Prothonotary/Clerk of Courts (2017)
“Section 9111 of CHRIA, 18 Pa. C.S. § 9111, provides: It shall be the duty of every criminal justice agency within the Commonwealth to maintain complete and accurate criminal history record information and to report such information at such times and in such manner as required by…”
M. Carrero, Jr. v. PSP Central Repository (2023)
“]” 18 Pa. C.S. §9111. Section 9151(a) of CHRIA states that “[a]ny individual or his legal representative has the right to review, challenge, correct and appeal the accuracy and completeness of his criminal history record information.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9111(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.