Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9158.4 (2026)

 Judicial review.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 9158.4.  Judicial review.

(a)  Petition for review.--Subject to subsection (d), a requesting party may file a petition for review appealing a denial under section 9158.3(a)(2) (relating to denial), which shall include the following:

(1)  The request for dissemination.

(2)  Proof of service of the request for dissemination.

(3)  The denial.

(4)  Other information necessary to determine whether the criminal history investigative information should be disseminated under this subchapter.

(b)  Time for petition.--A petition for review shall be filed within 45 days of service of a denial of a request for dissemination of information.

(c)  Location of filing.--A petition for review shall be filed before the court of common pleas in any judicial district in which the criminal justice agency that issued the denial is located. For a criminal justice agency with Statewide jurisdiction, the petition for review shall be filed in Commonwealth Court.

(d)  Judicial review.--A denial under section 9158.3(a)(1) shall not be subject to judicial review.

(e)  Relief.--In a proceeding under this section, a court may award declaratory and injunctive relief only. The court shall direct a criminal justice agency to produce the requested information if the requesting party proves entitlement to access under this subchapter by a preponderance of the evidence.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: L.A. Reier, Individually & as Adm'x of the Est. of A.J. Reier v. PSP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025).
L.A. Reier, Individually & as Adm'x of the Est. of A.J. Reier v. PSP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). · cites it 4× “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4. Moreover, the section of the Act pertaining to judicial review states: 9 We note that while Petitioner’s brief frequently references and makes arguments pursuant to the RTKL, the instant matter is not before this Court as an RTKL appeal.”
In Re: Order Amending Rule 1512 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure (Pa. 2023). “18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4(a)-(c). Notably, only specific grounds for a denial can be appealed.”
In Re: Order Amending Rule 1512 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure (Pa. 2023). “]; (4) a criminal justice agency with statewide jurisdiction denying a request for dissemination of criminal history investigative information, in accordance with 18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4, shall be filed within 45 days after service of the denial.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9158.4(a) — 2 cases
In Re: Order Amending Rule 1512 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure (Pa. 2023). “18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4(a)-(c). Notably, only specific grounds for a denial can be appealed.”
L.A. Reier, Individually & as Adm'x of the Est. of A.J. Reier v. PSP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4. Moreover, the section of the Act pertaining to judicial review states: 9 We note that while Petitioner’s brief frequently references and makes arguments pursuant to the RTKL, the instant matter is not before this Court as an RTKL appeal.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9158.4(b) — 1 case
L.A. Reier, Individually & as Adm'x of the Est. of A.J. Reier v. PSP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4. Moreover, the section of the Act pertaining to judicial review states: 9 We note that while Petitioner’s brief frequently references and makes arguments pursuant to the RTKL, the instant matter is not before this Court as an RTKL appeal.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9158.4(e) — 1 case
L.A. Reier, Individually & as Adm'x of the Est. of A.J. Reier v. PSP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). “” 18 Pa.C.S. § 9158.4. Moreover, the section of the Act pertaining to judicial review states: 9 We note that while Petitioner’s brief frequently references and makes arguments pursuant to the RTKL, the instant matter is not before this Court as an RTKL appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.