Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
For the limited and special purpose of ensuring repayment of principal and interest
on loans made pursuant to this chapter, the Public Utility Commission shall approve
such security issues, affiliated interest agreements and rate increase requests by
applicants that are regulated utilities as are necessary and appropriate. For this
purpose, the Public Utility Commission shall establish such expedited practices, procedures
and policies as necessary to facilitate and accomplish repayment of the loans. Nothing
in this chapter shall be construed as to require approval of rate increases greater
than that necessary to accomplish the repayment of loans made pursuant to this chapter.
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 869 A.2d 1144 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). · cites it 4ד32 Pa.C.S. § 7518. [31] As we noted in PIEC, it was the absence of express statutory authority that led us to conclude in Masthope, that the Water Act loan repayments could not be recovered by surcharge.”
Barasch v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 562 A.2d 414 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989). · cites it 2ד2d 646 (1989), which bars a utility, absent express legislative authorization, from including in its rates, in any manner, the cost of property which is not used and useful in providing utility service to current ratepayers, controls this case; or, whether the provisions of…”
Masthope Rapids Prop. Owners Council v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 581 A.2d 994 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1990). “On December 13, 1988, CS Water filed a motion to strike, or, in the alternative, an answer to Masthope’s November 30, 1988 complaint, and asserted, inter alia, that Section 7518 of the Water Act, 32 Pa.C.S. § 7518, requires that the Commission provide expedited rate recovery of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.