Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 2965. Exclusions.
(a) General rule.--The provisions of sections 2930 (relating to propagating permits), 2962(a) (relating
to exotic wildlife dealer permits), 2963(a) (relating to exotic wildlife possession
permits) and 2964(a) (relating to menagerie permits) shall not apply to any:
(1) Public zoological garden which receives government grants or appropriations.
(2) Private zoological park or garden which is open to the public and is accredited by
the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums.
(3) Nationally recognized circus.
(b) Specific exclusion for exotic wildlife dealer permits.--The provisions of section 2962(a) shall not apply to any individual, partnership,
association or corporation which holds a permit issued pursuant to section 2964, providing
the purchase or sale of exotic wildlife or other authorized transaction is conducted
for the sole purpose of maintaining stock for the menagerie.
Cross References. Section 2965 is referred to in section 2962 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, 381 F.3d 202 (3rd Cir. 2004).
· cites it 4× “*211 The categorical exemptions in 34 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 2965(a) for zoos and “nationally recognized circuses” likewise trigger strict scrutiny because at least some of the exemptions available under this provision undermine the interests served by the fee provision to at…”
Black Hawk v. Pennsylvania, 225 F. Supp. 2d 465 (M.D. Penn. 2002).
· cites it 2× “34 Pa.C.S. § 2965(a)(1) — (3). The Commission also does not charge a fee for educational exhibits of wildlife.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2965(a) — 1 case
Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, 381 F.3d 202 (3rd Cir. 2004).
“*211 The categorical exemptions in 34 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 2965(a) for zoos and “nationally recognized circuses” likewise trigger strict scrutiny because at least some of the exemptions available under this provision undermine the interests served by the fee provision to at…”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2965(a)(1) — 2 cases
Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, 381 F.3d 202 (3rd Cir. 2004).
“*211 The categorical exemptions in 34 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 2965(a) for zoos and “nationally recognized circuses” likewise trigger strict scrutiny because at least some of the exemptions available under this provision undermine the interests served by the fee provision to at…”
Black Hawk v. Pennsylvania, 225 F. Supp. 2d 465 (M.D. Penn. 2002).
“34 Pa.C.S. § 2965(a)(1) — (3). The Commission also does not charge a fee for educational exhibits of wildlife.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2965(a)(l) — 1 case
Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, 381 F.3d 202 (3rd Cir. 2004).
“*211 The categorical exemptions in 34 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 2965(a) for zoos and “nationally recognized circuses” likewise trigger strict scrutiny because at least some of the exemptions available under this provision undermine the interests served by the fee provision to at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.