Pa. Cons. Stat. » 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. (GAME) / Chapter 9
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925 (2026)

 Jurisdiction and penalties.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 925.  Jurisdiction and penalties.

(a)  Jurisdiction.--Notwithstanding the provisions of Title 42 (relating to judiciary and judicial procedure), all magisterial district judges shall have jurisdiction for all violations of this title which are classified as summary offenses and may accept guilty pleas and impose sentences for violations of this title classified as ungraded misdemeanors.

(b)  Fines and penalties for violations.--In addition to any other requirements of this title, the following fines and penalties shall be imposed for violations of this title:

(1)  Felony of the third degree, not more than $15,000 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to 36 months.

(2)  Misdemeanor of the first degree, not more than $10,000 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to 18 months.

(3)  Misdemeanor of the second degree, not more than $5,000 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to 12 months.

(4)  Misdemeanor not more than $3,000 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to six months.

(5)  Summary offense of the first degree, not less than  $1,000 nor more than $1,500 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to three months.

(6)  Summary offense of the second degree, not less than  $400 nor more than $800 and may be sentenced to imprisonment up to one month.

(7)  Summary offense of the third degree, not less than  $250 nor more than $500.

(8)  Summary offense of the fourth degree, not less than  $150 nor more than $300.

(9)  Summary offense of the fifth degree, not less than  $100 nor more than $200.

(10)  Summary offense of the sixth degree, $75.

(11)  Summary offense of the seventh degree, $50.

(12)  Summary offense of the eighth degree, $25.

(b.1)  Costs of prosecution for violations.--In addition to the imposition of any fines and penalties, costs of prosecution shall be assessed pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 1725.1 (relating to costs), 3571 (relating to Commonwealth portion of fines, etc.) and section 1403 of the act of August 9, 1955 (P.L.323, No.130), known as The County Code, and as otherwise deemed appropriate by the court.

(c)  Penalty for undesignated violations.--A person who violates any provision of this title for which a particular penalty is not designated commits:

(1)  A misdemeanor of the second degree if the violation involves an endangered or threatened species and no more severe penalty is fixed.

(2)  A summary offense of the fifth degree for any other violation.

(d)  Enhanced penalties for certain violations.--If applicable, one or more of the following may apply to certain offenses:

(1)  An additional fine of one and one-half times the amount of the applicable fine may be imposed when the offense is a second or subsequent offense within a seven-year period or during the same criminal episode and no penalties for second or subsequent offenses are prescribed for the violation under this title.

(2)  An additional fine of $500 may be imposed when the offense involves the unlawful taking of big game or threatened or endangered species and a witness report was instrumental in securing a successful conviction. Any additional fines imposed under this paragraph shall be directed to the commission to compensate any witness whose report directly results in a successful conviction. If applicable, each witness, up to a maximum of two, shall be compensated $250 for each additional $500 imposed.

(e)  Installment payment of fines.--Upon a plea and proof that person is unable to pay any fine and costs imposed under this title, a court may, in accordance with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9758 (relating to fine), permit installment payments it considers appropriate to the circumstances of the person, in which case its order shall specify when each installment payment is due.

(f)  Nonpayment of fines and costs.--Unless otherwise provided in this title, each person who fails to pay any fines and costs imposed may, after a hearing before a magisterial district judge, be imprisoned until the fines and costs are paid in full. The court may imprison the person for a number of days equal to one day for each $40 of the unpaid balance of the  fines and costs not to exceed six months.

(g)  Adjudication alternative program inapplicable.--The provisions of 42 Pa.C.S. § 1520 (relating to adjudication alternative program) shall not be applied as an adjudication alternative for any violation or offense under this title.

(h)  Separate offenses.--Where game or wildlife is unlawfully taken, killed, wounded, possessed, transported, purchased, concealed or sold, each bird or animal or part thereof involved in the violation constitutes a separate offense.

(i)  Replacement costs.--In addition to the fines and costs imposed for violations pursuant to subsection (b), the costs incurred by the commission for the replacement of the species involved in the violation shall be assessed by the magisterial district judge in such amount as is fixed by regulation of the commission. Replacement costs shall only be assessed for violations relating to threatened or endangered species of North American game or wildlife and such other species of Pennsylvania game or wildlife as designated by the commission.

(j)  Title 18 inapplicable.--Title 18 (relating to crimes and offenses) is inapplicable to this title insofar as it relates to:

(1)  intent, willfulness of conduct or fines and imprisonment for convictions of summary offenses and misdemeanors; or

(2)  criminal records under 18 Pa.C.S. Ch. 91 (relating to criminal history record information) for misdemeanors under section 2522(b)(1) (relating to shooting at or causing injury to human beings).

(k)  Impact on other laws.--A felony under this title shall not be deemed to constitute a felony for the purpose of any other law relating to disqualification from employment, loss of suffrage or for any other purpose.

(Dec. 19, 1996, P.L.1442, No.184, eff. 60 days; Dec. 21, 1998, P.L.1274, No.166, eff. July 1, 1999; Dec. 30, 2003, P.L.436, No.63, eff. 60 days; Nov. 30, 2004, P.L.1618, No.207, eff. 60 days; July 9, 2010, P.L.387, No.54, 60 days; Oct. 24, 2012, P.L.1205, No.150, eff. 60 days)

 

2012 Amendment.  Act 150 amended subsec. (a).

2010 Amendment.  See section 6 of Act 54 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to public notice.

2004 Amendment.  See section 29 of Act 207 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to construction of law.

References in Text.  The act of August 9, 1955, P.L.323, No.130, known as The County Code, referred to in subsec. (b.1), was repealed by the act of May 8, 2024, P.L.50, No.14. The subject matter is now contained in section 14303 of Title 16 (Counties).

Cross References.  Section 925 is referred to in section 2510 of this title; section 2703 of Title 3 (Agriculture).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Arneson v. Wolf, 117 A.3d 374 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arneson v. Wolf, 117 A.3d 374 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “§ 321 (stating that the duties and powers of the Game Commission pertain to the administration and enforcement of the Game and Wildlife Code); 34 Pa.C.S. § 925 (stating that in prosecuting violations of the Game and Wildlife Code, the district justices shall have jurisdiction to…”
Commonwealth v. Sellinger, 763 A.2d 525 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). · cites it 2× “” 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(j). The trial court recognized this but believed as we do that the Legislature intended that some voluntary act must be proved before there is a violation of the Game Laws.”
Commonwealth v. Stahl, 4 Pa. D. & C.4th 321 (1989). · cites it 3× “34 Pa.C.S. §925. . Compare this broad language which can be interpreted to encompass virtually any conduct that the officer deems an interference with his duties, even a verbal challenge to an investigation or an arrest (see City of Houston v.”
Spence v. Pennsylvania Game Comm'n, 850 A.2d 821 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004). “See 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(b)(8). Additionally, Section 929(a), 34 Pa.”
Com. of PA v. K.A. Rensel (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2024). “” Section 925(b)(7) of the Game Code, 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(b)(7). Before turning to the facts, I am mindful that where, as here, there is a challenge to sufficiency of the evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, accept…”
Com. v. R.C. Comly (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “It would be an exceedingly difficult burden for the Commonwealth to carry if it had to prove that a hunter acted with the intent to violate the statute.”
Commonwealth v. Bevilheimer, 3 Pa. D. & C.4th 334 (1989). “In fact, the penalties authorized in 34 Pa.C.S. §925(b) which.are listed as misdemeanors of the first, second and third degree, and summary offenses of the first through eighth degrees are substantially different than the penalties imposed by the Crimes Code.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(b) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Bevilheimer, 3 Pa. D. & C.4th 334 (1989). “In fact, the penalties authorized in 34 Pa.C.S. §925(b) which.are listed as misdemeanors of the first, second and third degree, and summary offenses of the first through eighth degrees are substantially different than the penalties imposed by the Crimes Code.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(b)(4) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Stahl, 4 Pa. D. & C.4th 321 (1989). “34 Pa.C.S. §925. . Compare this broad language which can be interpreted to encompass virtually any conduct that the officer deems an interference with his duties, even a verbal challenge to an investigation or an arrest (see City of Houston v.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(b)(7) — 1 case
Com. of PA v. K.A. Rensel (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2024). “” Section 925(b)(7) of the Game Code, 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(b)(7). Before turning to the facts, I am mindful that where, as here, there is a challenge to sufficiency of the evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, accept…”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(b)(8) — 1 case
Spence v. Pennsylvania Game Comm'n, 850 A.2d 821 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004). “See 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(b)(8). Additionally, Section 929(a), 34 Pa.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(f) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Stahl, 4 Pa. D. & C.4th 321 (1989). “34 Pa.C.S. §925. . Compare this broad language which can be interpreted to encompass virtually any conduct that the officer deems an interference with his duties, even a verbal challenge to an investigation or an arrest (see City of Houston v.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 925(j) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Sellinger, 763 A.2d 525 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “” 34 Pa.C.S. § 925(j). The trial court recognized this but believed as we do that the Legislature intended that some voluntary act must be proved before there is a violation of the Game Laws.”
Com. v. R.C. Comly (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “It would be an exceedingly difficult burden for the Commonwealth to carry if it had to prove that a hunter acted with the intent to violate the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.