Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 5531. No limitation.
The following actions and proceedings may be commenced at any time notwithstanding
any other provision of this subchapter except section 5521 (relating to limitations
on foreign claims):
(1) An action against an attorney at law by or on behalf of a client to enforce any implied
or resulting trust as to real property.
(2) An action by the Commonwealth, a county or an institution district against the real
or personal property of persons who were public charges, including mental patients,
to recover the cost of their maintenance and support.
(3) An action by the Commonwealth, a county or an institution district against the real
or personal property of persons who were legally liable to pay for the maintenance
and support of persons who were public charges, including mental patients, to recover
the cost of their maintenance and support.
Cross References. Section 5531 is referred to in section 5527 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
11
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case:
Weinar, M. v. Lex, W., 176 A.3d 907 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Weinar, M. v. Lex, W., 176 A.3d 907 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
“See 42 Pa. C.S. § 5531 (only types.of civil actions not subject to a limitations period are a client’s action against an attorney to enforce an implied or resulting trust as to real property and an action by the Commonwealth or specified other government bodies to recover…”
Simmons v. Cohen, 534 A.2d 140 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987).
· cites it 2× “* *** 5 Petitioner responds by asserting that the applicable statute of limitations is either that contained in section 5531 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. §5531, 6 providing no limitation, or that contained in section 1411 of the Welfare Code, Act of June 13, 1967, P.”
Tigue v. Steger (In Re Tigue), 82 B.R. 724 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988).
“We believe that this remedy, as well as the underlying action, is therefore so closely related to be within the scope of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5531(1), and thus not be subject to any statute of limitations.”
Doyle v. Lipoff (In Re Penn Packing Co.), 42 B.R. 502 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1984).
“, 42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 5531(1) (Purdon 1981) (there is no time bar for commencing proceedings against an attorney by a client to enforce any implied or resulting trust as to real property.”
Cecil Twp. Mun. Auth. v. North Am. Specialty Sur. Co., 836 F. Supp. 2d 367 (W.D. Pa. 2011).
“8 Contract and similar claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations, 9 a few civil actions are exempt from any limitations period (42 Pa.C.S. § 5531), and a “catch-all” period applies to any civil action not specifically assigned to one of the enumerated periods (id.”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp. v. Rockland Constr. Co., 448 A.2d 1047 (Pa. 1982).
“Appellees attempt to distinguish our decision in Bishop and Overmoyer on the ground that in enacting the statute of limitations at issue in this case, the Legislature also enacted a statute of limitations which states that no time limitation shall apply to actions brought by the…”
Fricker v. Corestates Bank, N.A. (In Re Fricker), 192 B.R. 388 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1996).
“Clearly, the claims asserted do not fall within the very limited scope of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5531, which is applicable only to actions against attorneys to enforce trusts and certain actions by the Commonwealth.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5531(1) — 2 cases
Tigue v. Steger (In Re Tigue), 82 B.R. 724 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988).
“We believe that this remedy, as well as the underlying action, is therefore so closely related to be within the scope of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5531(1), and thus not be subject to any statute of limitations.”
Doyle v. Lipoff (In Re Penn Packing Co.), 42 B.R. 502 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1984).
“, 42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 5531(1) (Purdon 1981) (there is no time bar for commencing proceedings against an attorney by a client to enforce any implied or resulting trust as to real property.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5531(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp. v. Rockland Constr. Co., 448 A.2d 1047 (Pa. 1982).
“Appellees attempt to distinguish our decision in Bishop and Overmoyer on the ground that in enacting the statute of limitations at issue in this case, the Legislature also enacted a statute of limitations which states that no time limitation shall apply to actions brought by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.