Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762 (2026)

Appeals from courts of common pleas.

✓ current as of May 2026

Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 762. Appeals from courts of common pleas.

(a) General rule.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the Commonwealth Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas in the following cases:

(1) Commonwealth civil cases.--All civil actions or proceedings:

(i) Original jurisdiction of which is vested in another tribunal by virtue of any of the exceptions to section 761(a)(1) (relating to original jurisdiction), except actions or proceedings in the nature of applications for a writ of habeas corpus or post-conviction relief not ancillary to proceedings within the appellate jurisdiction of the court.

(ii) By the Commonwealth government, including any officer thereof acting in his official capacity.

(2) Governmental and Commonwealth regulatory criminal cases.--All criminal actions or proceedings for the violation of any:

(i) Rule, regulation or order of any Commonwealth agency.

(ii) Regulatory statute administered by any Commonwealth agency subject to Subchapter A of Chapter 5 of Title 2 (relating to practice and procedure of Commonwealth agencies). The term "regulatory statute" as used in this subparagraph does not include any provision of Title 18 (relating to crimes and offenses).

(3) Secondary review of certain appeals from Commonwealth agencies.--All appeals from Commonwealth agencies which may be taken initially to the courts of common pleas under section 933 (relating to appeals from government agencies).

(4) Local government civil and criminal matters.--

(i) All actions or proceedings arising under any municipality, institution district, public school, planning or zoning code or under which a municipality or other political subdivision or municipality authority may be formed or incorporated or where is drawn in question the application, interpretation or enforcement of any:

(A) statute regulating the affairs of political subdivisions, municipality and other local authorities or other public corporations or of the officers, employees or agents thereof, acting in their official capacity;

(B) home rule charter or local ordinance or resolution; or

(ii) All appeals from government agencies other than Commonwealth agencies decided under section 933 or otherwise.

(5) Certain private corporation matters.--

(i) All actions or proceedings relating to corporations not-for-profit arising under Title 15 (relating to corporations and unincorporated associations) or where is drawn in question the application, interpretation or enforcement of any provision of the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, or the Constitution of Pennsylvania or any statute, regulating in any such case the corporate affairs of any corporation not-for-profit subject to Title 15 or the affairs of the members, security holders, directors, officers, employees or agents thereof, as such.

(ii) All actions or proceedings otherwise involving the corporate affairs of any corporation not-for-profit subject to Title 15 or the affairs of the members, security holders, directors, officers, or employees or agents thereof, as such.

(6) Eminent domain.--All eminent domain proceedings or where is drawn in question the power or right of the acquiring agency to appropriate the condemned property or to use it for the purpose condemned or otherwise.

(7) Immunity waiver matters.--Matters conducted pursuant to Subchapter C of Chapter 85 (relating to actions against local parties).

(b) Exception.--The Commonwealth Court shall not have jurisdiction of such classes of appeals from courts of common pleas as are by section 722 (relating to direct appeals from courts of common pleas) within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

(Apr. 28, 1978, P.L.202, No.53, eff. 60 days; Sept. 28, 1978, P.L.788, No.152, eff. imd.; Oct. 5, 1980, P.L.693, No.142, eff. 60 days; Dec. 5, 1980, P.L.1104, No.189, eff. imd.; Dec. 20, 1982, P.L.1409, No.326, eff. 60 days)

1982 Amendment. Act 326 amended subsec. (a), retroactive to December 5, 1980, as to subsec. (a)(1)(ii).

Cross References. Section 762 is referred to in section 933 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 432 cases (84 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: James J. Gory Mech. Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 855 A.2d 669 (Pa. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

James J. Gory Mech. Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 855 A.2d 669 (Pa. 2004). · cites it 6× “On September 19, 2001, however, the Commonwealth Court entered an order stating: "[I]t appearing that this is a breach of contract dispute and as such is not within the jurisdiction of this court, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, this matter is transferred to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.”

Joseph v. Glunt, 96 A.3d 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “Additionally, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, which sets forth the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court, specifically excludes "applications for a writ of habeas corpus or post-conviction relief not ancillary to proceedings within the appellate jurisdiction of the court.”

In Re Milton Hershey Sch. Trust, 807 A.2d 324 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002). · cites it 6× “Jurisdiction The Commonwealth Court's jurisdiction over appeals from the courts of common pleas is set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Any appeal that is not, by statute, taken to the Commonwealth Court or to the Supreme Court under 42 Pa.”

In Re Admin. Order No. 1-Md-2003, 936 A.2d 1 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 3× “42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt filed a lone dissent contending that Troutman had standing to challenge the Order, but that the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County and the Commonwealth Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.”

Med. Shoppe, Ltd. v. Wayne Mem'l Hosp., 866 A.2d 455 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). · cites it 6× “Section 762 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, confers jurisdiction in this Court to consider appeals from the final orders of the courts of common pleas in cases involving the Commonwealth government, its officers and local government matters.”

Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks Cnty., 936 A.2d 1 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 3× “42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt filed a lone dissent contending that Troutman had standing to challenge the Order, but that the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County and the Commonwealth Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.”

Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Ass'n v. Guiswite, 197 A.3d 1243 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 3× “Of relevance to this appeal, the Commonwealth Court has "exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas" in (i) All actions or proceedings relating to corporations not-for-profit arising under Title 15 (relating to corporations and…”

Commonwealth v. All That Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 Univ. Drive, 104 A.3d 411 (Pa. 2014). · cites it 3× “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 762 (vesting jurisdiction in the Commonwealth Court in appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas in civil actions commenced by the Commonwealth); Strand v.”

Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, 832 A.2d 1004 (Pa. 2003). · cites it 2× “42 Pa.C.S. § 762(a)(1)®. Applying the preclusive effect of appellate jurisdiction described in Lindberg , the Commonwealth Court does not have jurisdiction to hear monetary claims; rather, that court is responsible for the appellate review of such an action.”

Smith v. Ivy Lee Real Est., LLC, 152 A.3d 1062 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Section 762(a)(4)(i)(A) of the Judicial Code provides that the Commonwealth Court has “exclusive jurisdiction” over appeals from the courts of common pleas in “[a]ll actions or proceedings ... where is drawn in question the application, interpretation or enforcement of any .”

Lichtman v. Glazer, 111 A.3d 1225 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “751; 42 Pa. C.S. § 762(a)(7). In making this argument, Appellant misconstrues the citations in Superior Court’s order as rulings that affected the outcome of this matter.”

Fraport Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Cnty. Airport, 296 A.3d 9 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). · cites it 2× “(See ACAA’s Brief, at 3; citing 42 Pa.C.S. § 762(a)(1), (4)). While Section 762 of the Judicial Code provides for the Commonwealth Court’s exclusive appellate jurisdiction over civil cases “by the Commonwealth government,” municipal and other local authorities such as ACAA are…”

Show all 432 citing cases →

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(2) — 1 case

Commonwealth v. Reed, 713 A.2d 150 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(3) — 1 case

In Re: Est. of E.J. Potocar, Potocar Fam. Trust ~ Appeal of: Dept. of Revenue, Inheritance Tax Div. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(4) — 2 cases

Famiano v. Commonwealth, 522 A.2d 1205 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987).

Mosholder v. Greene Cnty. Indus. Dev. Corp., 411 A.2d 1262 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1980).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(4)(i)(B) — 1 case

Com. v. Spuglio, E. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(5) — 2 cases

Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Found. v. Ziegler, 200 A.3d 58 (Pa. 2019).

Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Hoffstot (Pa. 2019).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(5)(ii) — 1 case

Med. Shoppe, Ltd. v. Wayne Mem'l Hosp., 866 A.2d 455 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “Section 762 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, confers jurisdiction in this Court to consider appeals from the final orders of the courts of common pleas in cases involving the Commonwealth government, its officers and local government matters.”

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a) — 54 cases

Borsello v. Colleran, 833 A.2d 1213 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

In re Dom. Relations Hearing Room, 796 A.2d 407 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002).

Philadelphia Dist. Attorney's Off. v. C. Williams, 207 A.3d 410 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2019).

Hoover v. Bucks Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau, 405 A.2d 562 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979).

Muntan v. City of Monongahela, 406 A.2d 811 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(1) — 17 cases

Fraport Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Cnty. Airport, 296 A.3d 9 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). “(See ACAA’s Brief, at 3; citing 42 Pa.C.S. § 762(a)(1), (4)). While Section 762 of the Judicial Code provides for the Commonwealth Court’s exclusive appellate jurisdiction over civil cases “by the Commonwealth government,” municipal and other local authorities such as ACAA are…”

James J. Gory Mech. Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 855 A.2d 669 (Pa. 2004). “On September 19, 2001, however, the Commonwealth Court entered an order stating: "[I]t appearing that this is a breach of contract dispute and as such is not within the jurisdiction of this court, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, this matter is transferred to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.”

Rivera v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., 837 A.2d 525 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003).

Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, 832 A.2d 1004 (Pa. 2003). “42 Pa.C.S. § 762(a)(1)®. Applying the preclusive effect of appellate jurisdiction described in Lindberg , the Commonwealth Court does not have jurisdiction to hear monetary claims; rather, that court is responsible for the appellate review of such an action.”

Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Kmetz, 564 A.2d 1040 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(1)(h) — 5 cases

In Re Milton Hershey Sch. Trust, 807 A.2d 324 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002). “Jurisdiction The Commonwealth Court's jurisdiction over appeals from the courts of common pleas is set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Any appeal that is not, by statute, taken to the Commonwealth Court or to the Supreme Court under 42 Pa.”

Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks Cnty., 936 A.2d 1 (Pa. 2007). “42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt filed a lone dissent contending that Troutman had standing to challenge the Order, but that the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County and the Commonwealth Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.”

Commonwealth v. All That Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 Univ. Drive, 104 A.3d 411 (Pa. 2014). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 762 (vesting jurisdiction in the Commonwealth Court in appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas in civil actions commenced by the Commonwealth); Strand v.”

Commonwealth v. Baysore, 503 A.2d 33 (Pa. 1986).

Commonwealth v. McDermond, 560 A.2d 901 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(1)(i) — 15 cases

R.C. Scott v. J. Kersetes, E.M. Marsico, Jr. & K. Kane (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).

B.X. Cooper v. DOC (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).

Brooks, D. v. Gouker, T. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).

A.R. Muhammad v. A.C. Schwotzer (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(1)(ii) — 11 cases

In Re Admin. Order No. 1-Md-2003, 936 A.2d 1 (Pa. 2007). “42 Pa.C.S. § 762. Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt filed a lone dissent contending that Troutman had standing to challenge the Order, but that the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County and the Commonwealth Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.”

Maycock v. Gravely Corp., 508 A.2d 330 (Pa. 1986).

Delaware Cnty. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 827 A.2d 594 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

Barnes v. Barnes, 559 A.2d 980 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(2) — 9 cases

Fiore v. White, 757 A.2d 842 (Pa. 2000).

Commonwealth v. CSX Transp., Inc., 653 A.2d 1327 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995).

Commonwealth v. Buckman, 574 A.2d 697 (Pa. 1990).

Downs v. Commonwealth, 616 A.2d 39 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992).

Com. v. Bucher, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(2)(H) — 1 case

Lutz v. Commonwealth, 577 A.2d 957 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1990).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(2)(h) — 6 cases

Commonwealth v. Sanico, Inc., 830 A.2d 621 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Ahlborn, 626 A.2d 1265 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1993).

Commonwealth v. Morgera, 836 A.2d 1070 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 587 A.2d 379 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

Cullenen v. Commonwealth, 588 A.2d 988 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(2)(i) — 1 case

Com. v. Karash, F. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(2)(ii) — 9 cases

Commonwealth v. Fiore, 665 A.2d 1185 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995).

Fiore v. White, 757 A.2d 842 (Pa. 2000).

Scarpone v. Commonwealth, 596 A.2d 892 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

Harmon v. Commonwealth, 546 A.2d 726 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988).

Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Wylie, 638 A.2d 433 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(3) — 25 cases

Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 40 A.3d 1186 (Pa. 2012).

Pennsylvania Dep't of Aging v. Lindberg, 469 A.2d 1012 (Pa. 1983).

Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 849 A.2d 1135 (Pa. 2004).

Duffey v. Dept. of Transp., 607 A.2d 815 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992).

Feldman, B. v. Vito Braccia Constr., 2024 Pa. Super. 208 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4) — 46 cases

In re Silverman, 90 A.3d 771 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014).

Murray, H. v. Willistown Twp., 169 A.3d 84 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).

Burkholder v. Hutchison, 589 A.2d 721 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991).

Jordan v. Fayette Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 782 A.2d 642 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001).

Philadelphia Bd. of Pensions & Ret. v. Pearlman, 586 A.2d 466 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(A) — 1 case

Siegfried v. Borough of Wilson, 695 A.2d 892 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(i) — 13 cases

Fort Cherry Sch. Dist. v. Gedman, 894 A.2d 135 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).

Garzella v. Borough of Dunmore, 62 A.3d 486 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).

Commonwealth v. Theodorou, 777 A.2d 1203 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001).

Borough of Latrobe v. Pohland, 702 A.2d 1089 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997).

Mistick Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh, 646 A.2d 642 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(i)(A) — 20 cases

Smith v. Ivy Lee Real Est., LLC, 152 A.3d 1062 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “Section 762(a)(4)(i)(A) of the Judicial Code provides that the Commonwealth Court has “exclusive jurisdiction” over appeals from the courts of common pleas in “[a]ll actions or proceedings ... where is drawn in question the application, interpretation or enforcement of any .”

Graffigna v. City of Philadelphia, 512 A.2d 91 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1986).

Marsteller Cmty. Water Auth. v. P.J. Lehman Engineers, 605 A.2d 413 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).

Cmty. Coll. of Philadelphia v. Brown, 674 A.2d 670 (Pa. 1996).

Pitti v. Pocono Bus. Furniture, Inc., 859 A.2d 523 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(i)(B) — 14 cases

McMenamin v. Tartaglione, 590 A.2d 802 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

Osser v. City of Philadelphia, 441 A.2d 1317 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982).

Commonwealth v. Celano, 717 A.2d 1071 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998).

Holden v. Kay, 601 A.2d 453 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).

Maloney v. Maloney, 754 A.2d 36 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(i)(C) — 13 cases

Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002).

In Re Petition to Contest the Gen. Election for Dist. Just., 670 A.2d 629 (Pa. 1996).

In Re Nomination Petitions McElhatton, 729 A.2d 163 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).

J. Morley, Jr. v. L Farnese, Jr., K. Greenberg, 178 A.3d 910 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018).

Gordon v. Philadelphia Cnty. Democratic Exec. Comm., 80 A.3d 464 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(i)(c) — 1 case

B. Baxter v. Philadelphia Bd. of Elections (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2024).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(4)(ii) — 3 cases

N.L.Scott v. Bureau of Admin. Adjudication (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2024).

Zubik v. City of Pittsburgh (W.D. Pa. 2025).

D.J. Auerbach v. PA OOR (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(5) — 36 cases

Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Ass'n v. Guiswite, 197 A.3d 1243 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Of relevance to this appeal, the Commonwealth Court has "exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas" in (i) All actions or proceedings relating to corporations not-for-profit arising under Title 15 (relating to corporations and…”

Skytop Meadow Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. C. Paige & M.A. Paige, 177 A.3d 377 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017).

Feldman v. Lafayette Green Condo. Ass'n, 806 A.2d 497 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002).

The Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Isle of Capri Assoc., L.P. ~ Appeal of: Isle of Capri Assoc., L.P., 202 A.3d 845 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2019).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(5)(i) — 2 cases

Park Place Condo. Ass'n v. F. Ambrosia (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(5)(i1) — 1 case

Cent. PA Radiation Oncology, P.C., a PA corp. v. The Good Samaritan Hosp. of Lebanon, PA (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2021).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(5)(ii) — 8 cases

Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Found., a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corp. v. A.P. Ziegler, Jr. M.S. Bibro & J.R. Norris, 161 A.3d 394 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017).

Conf. of African Union First Colored Methodist Protestant Church v. Shell, 627 A.2d 188 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993).

Gelman v. Philadelphia Port Corp., 546 A.2d 723 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988).

Peters Creek United Presbyterian Church v. Washington Presbytery, 90 A.3d 95 (2014).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(6) — 7 cases

Gerg v. Twp. of Fox, 107 A.3d 849 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).

Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp. v. Hess, 423 A.2d 434 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1980).

Schantz v. BAHRY, 43 A.3d 536 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).

Mandracchia v. Stoney Creek Real Est. Corp., 576 A.2d 1181 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1990).

Fengfish v. Dallmyer, 642 A.2d 1117 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(7) — 22 cases

Lichtman v. Glazer, 111 A.3d 1225 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “751; 42 Pa. C.S. § 762(a)(7). In making this argument, Appellant misconstrues the citations in Superior Court’s order as rulings that affected the outcome of this matter.”

Newman v. Thorn, 518 A.2d 1231 (Pa. 1986).

Brady Contracting Co. v. West Manchester Twp. Sewer Auth., 487 A.2d 894 (Pa. 1985).

Cmty. Coll. v. Seibert, 601 A.2d 1348 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(l) — 3 cases

Doe v. Commonwealth, 524 A.2d 1063 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987).

Powell v. Wrightstown Twp., 464 A.2d 651 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1983).

Murdoch v. Commonwealth, 531 A.2d 1164 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(l)(i) — 3 cases

Joseph v. Glunt, 96 A.3d 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “Additionally, 42 Pa.C.S. § 762, which sets forth the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court, specifically excludes "applications for a writ of habeas corpus or post-conviction relief not ancillary to proceedings within the appellate jurisdiction of the court.”

Commonwealth v. Snyder, 829 A.2d 783 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

Scott, R. v. Kerestes, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(a)(l)(ii) — 3 cases

Richardson v. Peters, 19 A.3d 1047 (Pa. 2011).

Delaware Cnty. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 827 A.2d 594 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).

Est. of Girard, 132 A.3d 623 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).

— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 762(b) — 4 cases

In Re: The Hon. S. Domitrovich ~ Appeal of: The Hon. S. Domitrovich (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2021).

Com. of PA ex rel. A.J. Watson, DA v. K.N. Crosby (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2023).

B. Baxter v. Philadelphia Bd. of Elections (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2024).

In Re Nomination Petition of Rizzo, 20 A.3d 546 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.