Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9792 (2026)
Definitions (Expired).
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 9792. Definitions (Expired).
2012 Expiration. Section 9792 expired December 20, 2012. See Act 111 of 2011.
2013 Unconstitutionality. Act 152 of 2004 was declared unconstitutional. Commonwealth v. Neiman, 84 A.3d 603 (Pa. 2013). The unconstitutionality took effect March 17, 2014.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 67
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Krouse, 799 A.2d 835 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002).
Commonwealth v. Krouse, 799 A.2d 835 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002). “4(b), supporting the SVP classification nor did the court specifically set forth findings regarding the necessary elements of an SVP as defined in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. Krouse timely appealed.”
Commonwealth v. Williams, 733 A.2d 593 (Pa. 1999). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. There is a distinct difference under the Act between the requirements and sanctions applicable to those persons who are classified as sexually violent predators and those who are not.”
Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 40 A.3d 1201 (Pa. 2012). “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. [3] The court reasoned that the statutory language of "30 consecutive days or more" required a "residence" to have some degree of permanence.”
Commonwealth v. Fuentes, 991 A.2d 935 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010). “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. Moreover, the evidence must establish that the defendant's conduct was "predatory.”
Commonwealth v. Williams, 832 A.2d 962 (Pa. 2003). “Although the Act is not explicit on this point, if sexually violent predator status is subsequently terminated, the individual would appear to revert to “offender” status, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792 (defining “offender”), in which case the total period of registration, determined in…”
Commonwealth v. Lee, 935 A.2d 865 (Pa. 2007). “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792; see G. Williams, 832 A.”
Nieves v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 995 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010). “Section 9792 of Megan’s Law, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. The Board may request that the State Sexual Offenders Assessment Board perform an assessment of an inmate prior to the Board’s parole decision, but the Board has no duty to do so.”
A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 143 A.3d 896 (Pa. 2016). “See Williams, supra; 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9792, 9795.1, 9795.4 (2000).”
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Dengler, 890 A.2d 372 (Pa. 2005). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. Also, as we have noted above, our General Assembly promulgated an exhaustive list of factors for an assessor such as Dr.”
Commonwealth v. Shugars, 895 A.2d 1270 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006). “¶ 17 Preliminarily, we note that the definition of a sexually violent predator is *1276 composed of two parts: first, the person must have been convicted of a sexually violent offense, and second, the person must be determined to be a sexually violent predator due to a mental…”
Commonwealth v. Conklin, 897 A.2d 1168 (Pa. 2006). “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792. 9 *144 In accordance with the Act, after receiving the verdict Judge Conway directed the State Sexual Offender Assessment Board to perform an SVP assessment of appellant.”
Commonwealth v. Haughwout, 837 A.2d 480 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003). “2d at 838 (quoting 42 Pa.C.S. § 9792) (emphasis in original).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.