§ 5003. Offenders who may be housed.
(a) Community corrections centers, parole violator centers and community corrections facilities.--The following offenders may be housed in community corrections centers, parole violator
centers and community corrections facilities:
(1) An offender paroled by the board who is in good standing as defined in section 6101
(relating to definitions).
(2) An offender paroled by the board who:
(i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii), is detained or awaiting a hearing or who
has been recommitted for a technical violation of the conditions of supervision if
the offender is eligible to be housed in a community corrections center, parole violator
center or community corrections facility under section 6138 (relating to violation
of terms of parole).
(ii) Subparagraph (i) shall not apply to an offender paroled by the board who is detained
pending resolution of criminal charges as a convicted violator under section 6138(a)
or awaiting a hearing or who has been recommitted.
(3) (Deleted by amendment).
(4) (Deleted by amendment).
(5) (Expired).
(b) Community corrections centers and community corrections facilities.--The following offenders may be housed in community corrections centers and community
corrections facilities:
(1) An offender who is serving the community-based portion of a sentence in a State drug
treatment program.
(2) An offender who has been granted clemency by the Governor.
(June 30, 2021, P.L.260, No.59, eff. imd.)
2013 Expiration. Paragraph (5) expired July 1, 2013. See Act 122 of 2012.
Notes of Decisions
Com. v. Lehman, R., 278 A.3d 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003(5) (expired July 1, 2013).”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
· cites it 2× “” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
· cites it 2× “35 See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003 (permitting several classes of offenders to be “housed in” community corrections facilities).”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
· cites it 2× “” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
· cites it 2× “35 See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003 (permitting several classes of offenders to be “housed in” community corrections facilities).”
Com. v. Lehman, R., 278 A.3d 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
· cites it 2× “See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003(a) (effective June 20, 2021).”
J. Shivers v. PPB (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2026).
“Section 5003 of the statute provides that the offenders who may be housed in 12 community corrections centers and community corrections facilities include: “(b)(1) An offender who is serving the community-based portion of a sentence in a State drug treatment program.”
J. Stover v. PA BPP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. §5003(3). 2 This court has original jurisdiction over actions against Commonwealth entities, except “actions or proceedings in the nature of applications for a writ of habeas corpus or post[-]conviction relief not ancillary to proceedings within the appellate…”
— 61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5003(3) — 1 case
J. Stover v. PA BPP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. §5003(3). 2 This court has original jurisdiction over actions against Commonwealth entities, except “actions or proceedings in the nature of applications for a writ of habeas corpus or post[-]conviction relief not ancillary to proceedings within the appellate…”
— 61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5003(5) — 1 case
Com. v. Lehman, R., 278 A.3d 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
“” 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003(5) (expired July 1, 2013).”
— 61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5003(a) — 3 cases
Com. v. Lehman, R., 278 A.3d 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
“See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003(a) (effective June 20, 2021).”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
— 61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5003(a)(1) — 2 cases
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“35 See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003 (permitting several classes of offenders to be “housed in” community corrections facilities).”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“35 See 61 Pa.C.S. § 5003 (permitting several classes of offenders to be “housed in” community corrections facilities).”
— 61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5003(a)(5) — 2 cases
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lehman, R. (Pa. 2024).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. § 5003(a). Simply put, Lehman would not have been residing at Renewal Center as a condition of his parole from a state sentence of incarceration unless he had been convicted of a crime and had been subsequently released on parole by the Parole Board, and,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.