§ 513. Competitive sealed proposals.
(a) Conditions for use.--When the contracting officer determines in writing that the use of competitive sealed
bidding is either not practicable or advantageous to the Commonwealth, a contract
may be entered into by competitive sealed proposals.
(b) Request for proposals.--Proposals shall be solicited through a request for proposals.
(c) Public notice.--Public notice of the request for proposals shall be given in the same manner as provided
in section 512(c) (relating to competitive sealed bidding).
(d) Receipt of proposals.--Offerors shall submit their proposals to ensure that their proposals are received
prior to the time and date established for receipt of the proposals. Proposals shall
be submitted in the format required by the request for proposals. Proposals shall
be opened so as to avoid disclosure of their contents to competing offerors.
(e) Evaluation.--The relative importance of the evaluation factors shall be fixed prior to opening
the proposals. A Commonwealth agency shall invite its comptroller to participate in
the evaluation as a nonvoting member of any evaluation committee. No individual who
has been employed by an offeror within the preceding two years may participate in
the evaluation of proposals.
(f) Discussion with responsible offerors and revision of proposals.--As provided in the request for proposals, discussions and negotiations may be conducted
with responsible offerors for the purpose of clarification and of obtaining best and
final offers. Responsible offers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect
to any opportunity for discussion and revision of proposals. In conducting discussions,
there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by
competing offerors.
(g) Selection for negotiation.--The responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous
to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors,
shall be selected for contract negotiation.
(h) Contract negotiation.--(Deleted by amendment).
(Dec. 3, 2002, P.L.1147, No.142, eff. imd.; Oct. 21, 2014, P.L.2517, No.149, eff.
60 days)
2014 Amendment. Act 149 amended subsec. (e).
2002 Amendment. Act 142 amended subsecs. (f) and (g) and deleted subsec. (h).
Cross References. Section 513 is referred to in sections 106.1, 511, 517, 534, 561, 3741 of this title;
section 9604 of Title 51 (Military Affairs).
Notes of Decisions
Unitedhealthcare of Pa., Inc. v. Pa. Dep't of Human Servs., 187 A.3d 1046 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018).
· cites it 5× “bsections (c) and (d), the following are exempt from access by a requester under this act: * * * (26) A proposal pertaining to agency procurement or disposal of supplies, services or construction prior to the award of the contract or prior to the opening and rejection of all…”
Omnicare, Inc. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 68 A.3d 20 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
· cites it 4× “Section 513 of the Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, provides for a competitive sealed proposal process in situations where a competitive bidding process would not be advantageous to the Commonwealth.”
Centurylink Pub. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
· cites it 4× “” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that ”[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
Dubaskas v. Commonwealth, 81 A.3d 167 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
· cites it 2× “In Pennsylvania Associated Builders, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Section 513 of the Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, applied to construction contracts.”
J. Ali v. Philadelphia City Plan. Comm'n, 125 A.3d 92 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
· cites it 2× “or construction prior to the award of the contract or prior to the opening and rejection of all bids; financial information of a bidder or offeror requested in an invitation for bid or request for proposals to demonstrate the bidder's or offeror’s economic capability; or the…”
Sci. Games Int'l, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013).
“See 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(b). 5 The plan was to replace an existing system which had been provided by Intervenor/Appellant, GTECH Corporation (with the Department of Revenue and DGS, collectively, “Appellants”).”
Common Sense Adoption Servs. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 799 A.2d 225 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002).
· cites it 2× “62 Pa. C.S. § 513(e). The RFP’in this case set forth mandatory requirements and designated Sandra Gallagher, an employee of DPW, and director of SWAN, as the project officer.”
Global TelLink Corp. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 809 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
· cites it 3× “” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that “[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
Brayman Constr. Corp. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 13 A.3d 925 (Pa. 2011).
“PennDOT’s argument appears to be twofold: first, that it is authorized to award construction contracts by “competitive sealed proposals” under Section 513 of the Code, see 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, and second, that the Commonwealth Court should not have held that it is prohibited from…”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(a) — 8 cases
Dubaskas v. Commonwealth, 81 A.3d 167 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
“In Pennsylvania Associated Builders, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Section 513 of the Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, applied to construction contracts.”
Centurylink Pub. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that ”[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
Global TelLink Corp. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 809 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that “[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(b) — 3 cases
Sci. Games Int'l, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013).
“See 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(b). 5 The plan was to replace an existing system which had been provided by Intervenor/Appellant, GTECH Corporation (with the Department of Revenue and DGS, collectively, “Appellants”).”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(c) — 2 cases
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(d) — 1 case
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(e) — 3 cases
Common Sense Adoption Servs. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 799 A.2d 225 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002).
“62 Pa. C.S. § 513(e). The RFP’in this case set forth mandatory requirements and designated Sandra Gallagher, an employee of DPW, and director of SWAN, as the project officer.”
Omnicare, Inc. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 68 A.3d 20 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
“Section 513 of the Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, provides for a competitive sealed proposal process in situations where a competitive bidding process would not be advantageous to the Commonwealth.”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(f) — 10 cases
Centurylink Pub. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that ”[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
Global TelLink Corp. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 809 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that “[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 513(g) — 13 cases
Unitedhealthcare of Pa., Inc. v. Pa. Dep't of Human Servs., 187 A.3d 1046 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018).
“bsections (c) and (d), the following are exempt from access by a requester under this act: * * * (26) A proposal pertaining to agency procurement or disposal of supplies, services or construction prior to the award of the contract or prior to the opening and rejection of all…”
Omnicare, Inc. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 68 A.3d 20 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
“Section 513 of the Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 513, provides for a competitive sealed proposal process in situations where a competitive bidding process would not be advantageous to the Commonwealth.”
Centurylink Pub. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., 109 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).
“” 62 Pa.C.S. § 513(a). . Section 513(g) of the Procurement Code states that ”[t]he responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the purchasing agency, taking into consideration price and all evaluation factors, shall be selected for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.