Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702 (2026)

 Construction, relocation, suspension and abolition of crossings.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 2702.  Construction, relocation, suspension and abolition of crossings.

(a)  General rule.--No public utility, engaged in the transportation of passengers or property, shall, without prior order of the commission, construct its facilities across the facilities of any other such public utility or across any highway at grade or above or below grade, or at the same or different levels; and no highway, without like order, shall be so constructed across the facilities of any such public utility, and, without like order, no such crossing heretofore or hereafter constructed shall be altered, relocated, suspended or abolished.

(b)  Acquisition of property and regulation of crossing.--The commission is hereby vested with exclusive power to appropriate property for any such crossing, except as to such property as has been or may hereafter be condemned by the Department of Transportation for projects financed entirely by the Commonwealth and for Federal Aid Projects under section 1004 of the act of June 1, 1945 (P.L.1242, No.428), known as the "State Highway Law," in which case the provisions of that statute shall be in effect, and to determine and prescribe, by regulation or order, the points at which, and the manner in which, such crossing may be constructed, altered, relocated, suspended or abolished, and the manner and conditions in or under which such crossings shall be maintained, operated, and protected to effectuate the prevention of accidents and the promotion of the safety of the public. The commission shall require every railroad the right-of-way of which crosses a public highway at grade to cut or otherwise control the growth of brush and weeds upon property owned by the railroad within 200 feet of such crossing on both sides and in both directions so as to insure proper visibility by motorists.

(c)  Mandatory relocation, alteration, suspension or abolition.--Upon its own motion or upon complaint, the commission shall have exclusive power after hearing, upon notice to all parties in interest, including the owners of adjacent property, to order any such crossing heretofore or hereafter constructed to be relocated or altered, or to be suspended or abolished upon such reasonable terms and conditions as shall be prescribed by the commission. In determining the plans and specifications for any such crossing, the commission may lay out, establish, and open such new highways as, in its opinion, may be necessary to connect such crossing with any existing highway, or make such crossing more available to public use; and may abandon or vacate such highways or portions of highways as, in the opinion of the commission, may be rendered unnecessary for public use by the construction, relocation, or abandonment of any of such crossings. The commission may order the work of construction, relocation, alteration, protection, suspension or abolition of any crossing aforesaid to be performed in whole or in part by any public utility or municipal corporation concerned or by the Commonwealth or an established nonprofit organization with a recreational or conservation purpose.

(d)  Procedure for appropriation of property.--When any real property is appropriated by the commission under this section, each parcel of such property so appropriated, shall be accurately described by metes and bounds, and the record owner of each such parcel shall be named in the order of appropriation. Unless otherwise recorded, the commission shall file with the recorder of deeds of the proper county, a copy of that portion of the order of the commission which appropriates such property, and such plans and other detailed information as the commission may deem necessary. Such portion of the commission's order dealing with the specific property appropriated shall be recorded and indexed under the name or names of the record owners of such specific property at the expense of the utility or utilities, political subdivision, municipality or municipalities, governmental agency, including the Department of Transportation and Public Utility Commission, corporation or persons upon whose instigation, petition or complaint the said crossing was constructed, reconstructed, relocated, altered, suspended or abolished, as may be ordered, to bear such expense or recording by the commission. When such appropriation of real property has been recorded under the provisions of any other statute, such recording shall not be duplicated under the terms of this subsection.

(e)  Reactivation.--The commission may, within its discretion upon petition by any railroad, the Commonwealth, a political subdivision or any other affected party by order reactivate any crossing suspended under this section.

(f)  Danger to safety.--Upon the commission's finding of an immediate danger to the safety and welfare of the public at any such crossing, the commission shall order the crossing to be immediately altered, improved, or suspended. Thereafter hearing shall be held and costs shall be allocated in the manner prescribed in this part.

(g)  Suspensions.--Any order of suspension under this section shall require the following for the protection of the motoring public:

(1)  Removal or covering of crossing warning devices.

(2) (i)  Paving over the tracks; or

(ii)  removal of the tracks and paving over of the area formerly occupied by said tracks; or

(iii)  barricading the crossing.

(h)  Assignment of crossing responsibilities to certain nonprofit organizations.--

(1)  The commission may order the work of abolition of any crossing in whole or in part, including any future obligations, to be performed by a municipal authority created to advance recreation or conservation purposes or a nonprofit organization with a recreation or conservation purpose if:

(i)  the municipal authority or nonprofit organization provides adequate security for the work or demonstrates financial responsibility to the satisfaction of the commission; and

(ii)  the commission does not order any Commonwealth agency to bear ancillary responsibility for the work of abolition of any crossing, or the cost associated with the work, without the prior written consent of the head of the Commonwealth agency.

(2)  In accordance with the provisions of section 2704 (relating to compensation for damages occasioned by construction, relocation or abolition of crossings), the commission may order the municipal authority or nonprofit organization assuming responsibility for the abolition of the crossing to bear all or a portion of the costs associated with the work. This section shall not apply to any proceeding wherein the commission has issued a final order prior to the effective date of its enactment.

(Dec. 3, 1998, P.L.920, No.113, eff. 60 days)

 

1998 Amendment.  Act 113 amended subsec. (c) and added subsec. (h).

Cross References.  Section 2702 is referred to in sections 102, 2704 of this title; section 1511 of Title 15 (Corporations and Unincorporated Associations).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 875 A.2d 1243 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005).
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 875 A.2d 1243 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). · cites it 14× “§ 701 or 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702 to order Norfolk to perform work at a pedestrian crossing.”
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 77 A.3d 619 (Pa. 2013). · cites it 5× “See 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. Before alterations may be undertaken, the Commission’s approval must be obtained.”
Pennsylvania Game Comm'n v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 651 A.2d 596 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). · cites it 10× “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. The ALJ determined that the removal of the structures would not have a significant adverse impact on trail use, because the right-of-way could be used for recreational purposes without the crossing structure, enabling the trail users to cross the roads at…”
Equitable Gas Co. v. City of Pittsburgh, 488 A.2d 270 (Pa. 1985). · cites it 2× “207, § 1, as amended, 53 P.S. § 7101. It was never intended that this scheme be utilized to circumvent the exclusive authority vested in the Public Utility Commission "to order any [rail highway] crossing .”
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. However, none of these costs, including the imposition of maintenance costs here, are paid to the government or used to support general government obligations.”
Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 592 A.2d 797 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991). · cites it 2× “The PUC is granted the power to regulate railroad-highway crossings 2 pursuant to Sections 2702 and 2704 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702, 2704. 3 The rationale underlying the Commonwealth’s entrustment of broad powers to the PUC to exercise the…”
PECO Energy Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 791 A.2d 1155 (Pa. 2002). “Section 2702 of the Public Utility Code, 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702, vests the Commission with the exclusive authority over rail-highway crossings and the manner and condition by which such crossings will be maintained.”
Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 778 A.2d 785 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). “The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the PUC’s authority to regulate rail-highway crossings and allocate costs of constructing and maintaining such crossings pursuant to Sections 2702 and 2704 of the Public Utility Code (Code), as amended, 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702 and 2704, has been…”
Huss v. Commonwealth, 512 A.2d 1356 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1986). · cites it 2× “Section 2702 of the PUC Code, 66 Pa. C. S. §2702. [4] And, Section 2704 provides for the determination of the amount of compensation to be paid to an injured property owner: *390 (a) General rule.”
At & T v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 737 A.2d 201 (Pa. 1999). · cites it 2× “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702(a). It is apparent that the words of limitation contained in the first clause of the statute (“engaged in the transportation of passengers or property”), which are *309 utilized only in connection with the construction of transportation-related facilities, are…”
Consol. Rail Corp. v. City of Harrisburg, 842 A.2d 369 (Pa. 2004). · cites it 4× “Since rail-highway crossings are regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the “PUC” or the “Commission”), see 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702, 2704, Conrail sought and obtained the agency’s approval to proceed, initially at its own expense, but subject to a subsequent…”
Friends of the Atglensusquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 717 A.2d 581 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “The Commission's authority over abolition of crossings derives from the mandate of Section 2702 of the Public Utility Code, 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. Subsection (b) vests the Commission with exclusive power "to determine and prescribe, by regulation or order, .”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(a) — 7 cases
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 77 A.3d 619 (Pa. 2013). “See 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. Before alterations may be undertaken, the Commission’s approval must be obtained.”
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 875 A.2d 1243 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “§ 701 or 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702 to order Norfolk to perform work at a pedestrian crossing.”
At & T v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 737 A.2d 201 (Pa. 1999). “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702(a). It is apparent that the words of limitation contained in the first clause of the statute (“engaged in the transportation of passengers or property”), which are *309 utilized only in connection with the construction of transportation-related facilities, are…”
Consol. Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 463 A.2d 90 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1983).
Sickles v. Consol. Rail Corp., 777 A.2d 1240 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001).
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(b) — 22 cases
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 875 A.2d 1243 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “§ 701 or 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702 to order Norfolk to perform work at a pedestrian crossing.”
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. However, none of these costs, including the imposition of maintenance costs here, are paid to the government or used to support general government obligations.”
Pennsylvania Game Comm'n v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 651 A.2d 596 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. The ALJ determined that the removal of the structures would not have a significant adverse impact on trail use, because the right-of-way could be used for recreational purposes without the crossing structure, enabling the trail users to cross the roads at…”
Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 592 A.2d 797 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991). “The PUC is granted the power to regulate railroad-highway crossings 2 pursuant to Sections 2702 and 2704 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702, 2704. 3 The rationale underlying the Commonwealth’s entrustment of broad powers to the PUC to exercise the…”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(c) — 10 cases
Pennsylvania Game Comm'n v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 651 A.2d 596 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). “66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. The ALJ determined that the removal of the structures would not have a significant adverse impact on trail use, because the right-of-way could be used for recreational purposes without the crossing structure, enabling the trail users to cross the roads at…”
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 77 A.3d 619 (Pa. 2013). “See 66 Pa.C.S. § 2702. Before alterations may be undertaken, the Commission’s approval must be obtained.”
Cnty. of Chester v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 408 A.2d 552 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979).
Consol. Rail Corp. v. City of Harrisburg, 842 A.2d 369 (Pa. 2004). “Since rail-highway crossings are regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the “PUC” or the “Commission”), see 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702, 2704, Conrail sought and obtained the agency’s approval to proceed, initially at its own expense, but subject to a subsequent…”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(e) — 1 case
Consol. Rail Corp. v. City of Harrisburg, 842 A.2d 369 (Pa. 2004). “Since rail-highway crossings are regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the “PUC” or the “Commission”), see 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2702, 2704, Conrail sought and obtained the agency’s approval to proceed, initially at its own expense, but subject to a subsequent…”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(f) — 1 case
North Lebanon Twp. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 962 A.2d 1237 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.