Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1703 (2026)

 Application of chapter.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1703.  Application of chapter.

This chapter does not apply with respect to any motor vehicle owned by the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 788 A.2d 955 (Pa. 2001).
Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 788 A.2d 955 (Pa. 2001). · cites it 2× “See 75 Pa.C.S. § 1703. An exception expressly provided in a statute is a strong indication that the legislature did not intend to exclude unexpressed items.”
Progressive N. Ins. v. Schneck, 813 A.2d 828 (Pa. 2002). · cites it 2× “Relying on 75 Pa.C.S. § 1703, we concluded the MVFRL did not permit the exclusion of all government vehicles.”
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 81 A.3d 103 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “See Nationwide Assur. Co. v. Easley, 960 A.2d 843 , 846 n.”
Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 746 A.2d 1118 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “” 75 Pa.C.S. § 1703. To this we apply our rule of statutory construction: “Exceptions expressed in a statute shall be construed to exclude all others.”
Rosenblum v. Port Auth., 560 A.2d 912 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1703. *42 We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the silence in the Financial Responsibility Law as to a pain and suffering damages threshold does not conflict with the threshold requirement the local agency provisions contain.”
Leitzel v. Nationwide Ins., 2 Pa. D. & C.4th 101 (1988). “Prior to amendment 7, 75 Pa.C.S. §1703 stated, “this chapter shall not be construed as preventing plaintiff in any action from relying upon, other remedies provided by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.