Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1735 (2026)
Coverages unaffected by workers' compensation benefits (Repealed).
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 1735. Coverages unaffected by workers' compensation benefits (Repealed).
1993 Repeal. Section 1735 was repealed July 2, 1993, P.L.190, No.44, effective immediately.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1989–2014 · leading case: Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & Municipalities, 32 A.3d 1213 (Pa. 2011).
Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & Municipalities, 32 A.3d 1213 (Pa. 2011). “On September 7, 2007, the trial court granted Heller's motion for summary judgment and denied Penn PRIME's motion for summary judgment. The court initially assessed the ability of an injured employee to collect workers' compensation and UIM benefits.”
Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 552 A.2d 1382 (Pa. 1989). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1735 (emphasis added). Although this act took effect after the incident here at issue, and therefore is not controlling as a statute, it is certainly a persuasive statement of what the legislature perceives as the appropriate public policy in dealing with such…”
Ducaji v. Dennis, 656 A.2d 102 (Pa. 1995). “However, *111 we found a "more compelling reason" to disallow reduction of uninsured motorist benefits in 75 Pa.C.S. § 1735 of the MVFRL, even though it took effect after the accident at issue.”
Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & Municipalities, 950 A.2d 362 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). “The parties agreed that the provision applies to the facts, but Heller argued before the trial court that the provision violates public policy and sought a declaration to that effect and an order voiding the provision on that basis.”
Hackenberg v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth., 586 A.2d 879 (Pa. 1991). “§ 1731, and that "[t]he coverages required by this subchapter shall not be made subject to an exclusion or reduction in amount because of any workers' compensation benefits payable as a result of the same injury," 75 Pa.C.S. § 1735. Absent section 1735, a dispute as to whether…”
Lewis v. Erie Ins. Exch., 793 A.2d 143 (Pa. 2002). “” 75 Pa.C.S. § 1735(a). Therefore, although we view the statutes as in pari materia in a broad sense, the material difference in their subject matter allows for differential treatment to the extent that this would appear to be legislatively intended.”
Chatham v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 570 A.2d 509 (Pa. 1989). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1735 (emphasis added). Although this act took effect after the incident here at issue, and therefore is controlled as a statute, it is certainly a persuasive statement of what the legislature perceives as the appropriate public policy in dealing with such set-offs.”
Ducjai v. Dennis, 636 A.2d 1130 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1735. Subchapter B, entitled "Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance First Party Benefits," does not include a similar exception; it does, however, include provisions which make reference to workers' compensation benefits as a separate recovery or setoff against other…”
Stermel v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd., 103 A.3d 876 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014). “682, and Sections 1735 and 1737 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1735, 1737. Section 25(b) repealed Sections 1720 and 1722 of Title 75, as set forth above.”
State Farm Ins. Companies v. Ridenour, 646 A.2d 1188 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1735 (repealed July 2. 1993, P.”
Gardner v. Erie Ins., 722 A.2d 1041 (Pa. 1999). “75 Pa.C.S. §1735 (repealed). 5 . Section 1737 was worded as follows: Notwithstanding anything contained in the act of June 2, 1915 (P.”
Ins. Co. of State of Pa. v. Miller, 627 A.2d 797 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1735 provides: The coverages required by this subchapter shall not be made subject to an exclusion or reduction in amount because of any workers’ compensation benefits payable as a result of the same injury.”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1735(a) — 1 case
Lewis v. Erie Ins. Exch., 793 A.2d 143 (Pa. 2002). “” 75 Pa.C.S. § 1735(a). Therefore, although we view the statutes as in pari materia in a broad sense, the material difference in their subject matter allows for differential treatment to the extent that this would appear to be legislatively intended.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.