Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1756 (2026)

Subrogation.

✓ current as of May 2026

Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1756. Subrogation.

The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability law of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs and any other sums paid to an eligible claimant under this subchapter.

(Feb. 12, 1984, P.L.53, No.12, eff. Oct. 1, 1984)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases, 1986–1999 · leading case: Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 552 A.2d 1382 (Pa. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 552 A.2d 1382 (Pa. 1989). · cites it 2× “Under the majority's analysis, the association itself would be the Class One insured, but the association never drives the fire trucks and is not the responsible party in case of a law suit the firefighters are, acting as agents of the municipality.”

Dyer v. Travelers, 572 A.2d 762 (Pa. 1990). “Subrogation The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability law of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs and any other sums paid to an eligible claimant under this subchapter.”

Kiker v. Pennsylvania Fin. Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 742 A.2d 1082 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2× “Specifically, [t]he Assigned Claims Plan or its assign-ee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability law of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs and any other sums paid to an eligible claimant under this…”

Melendez v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, 557 A.2d 767 (Pa. 1989). “75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1756. In support of its conclusion that Melendez forfeited her right to recover from Travelers, the trial court relied upon the memorandum decision of this Court in Rockmore v.”

Torres v. Pennsylvania Fin. Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 645 A.2d 1322 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). · cites it 2× “Appellant filed the suit against the tortfeasors only after notification by appellees that appellees would not pay his claim. [3] Travelers' right of subrogation, as the Plan's assignee, is authorized by statute: The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover,…”

Walker v. Pennsylvania Fin. Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 580 A.2d 872 (Pa. 1990). “The Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, at 75 Pa.C.S. § 1756, protects the subrogation rights of an assigned claims carrier as follows: *128 In Melendez v.”

Commonwealth v. Brezan, 614 A.2d 252 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). “The trial court had reviewed and discussed Section 1756 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1756, and had determined the parties’ rights based upon that analysis.”

Fisher v. USAA Cas. Ins., 778 F. Supp. 232 (E.D. Pa. 1991). “75 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1756. Next, the court interpreted the breadth of subrogation rights available to an Assigned Claims Plan insurer under section 1756: [sjubrogation rights should be construed in accordance with tort liability law of this Commonwealth.”

Baith v. CNA Ins. Companies, 593 A.2d 881 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991). “The MVFRL expressly provides for subrogation for all payments made by the Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1756, while the Uninsured Motorists Act provided for subrogation for all payments made pursuant to the Uninsured Motorist Act, Act of December 19,1968,…”

Davis v. Travelers Ins., 10 Pa. D. & C.4th 114 (1991). “§1756 provides as follows: “The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability láw of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs and any other sums paid to an eligible claimant under…”

Pickens v. Travelers Ins., 19 Pa. D. & C.4th 237 (1992). “The MVFRL protects the subrogation rights of an assigned claims carrier by specifying as follows: “75 Pa.C.S. §1756. Subrogation “The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability law of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for…”

Hockenberry v. Horace Mann Ins., 19 Pa. D. & C.4th 567 (1993). “75 Pa.C.S. §1756 (1991). In this case, subrogation is provided by the terms of the policy.”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.