Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802 (2026)

 Driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 3802.  Driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance.

(a)  General impairment.--

(1)  An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the individual is rendered incapable of safely driving, operating or being in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(2)  An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is at least 0.08% but less than 0.10% within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(b)  High rate of alcohol.--An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is at least 0.10% but less than 0.16% within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(c)  Highest rate of alcohol.--An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is 0.16% or higher within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(d)  Controlled substances.--An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle under any of the following circumstances:

(1)  There is in the individual's blood any amount of a:

(i)  Schedule I controlled substance, as defined in the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L.233, No.64), known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act;

(ii)  Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substance, as defined in The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, which has not been medically prescribed for the individual; or

(iii)  metabolite of a substance under subparagraph (i) or (ii).

(2)  The individual is under the influence of a drug or combination of drugs to a degree which impairs the individual's ability to safely drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(3)  The individual is under the combined influence of alcohol and a drug or combination of drugs to a degree which impairs the individual's ability to safely drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(4)  The individual is under the influence of a solvent or noxious substance in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7303 (relating to sale or illegal use of certain solvents and noxious substances).

(e)  Minors.--A minor may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the minor's blood or breath is 0.02% or higher within two hours after the minor has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(f)  Commercial or school vehicles.--An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a commercial vehicle, school bus or school vehicle in any of the following circumstances:

(1)  After the individual has imbibed a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is:

(i)  0.04% or greater within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of a commercial vehicle other than a school bus or a school vehicle.

(ii)  0.02% or greater within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of a school bus or a school vehicle.

(2)  After the individual has imbibed a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the individual is rendered incapable of safely driving, operating or being in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

(3)  While the individual is under the influence of a controlled substance or combination of controlled substances, as defined in section 1603 (relating to definitions).

(4)  While the individual is under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance or combination of controlled substances, as defined in section 1603.

(g)  Exception to two-hour rule.--Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), (b), (c), (e), (f) or (h), where alcohol or controlled substance concentration in an individual's blood or breath is an element of the offense, evidence of such alcohol or controlled substance concentration more than two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle is sufficient to establish that element of the offense under the following circumstances:

(1)  where the Commonwealth shows good cause explaining why the chemical test sample could not be obtained within two hours; and

(2)  where the Commonwealth establishes that the individual did not imbibe any alcohol or utilize a controlled substance between the time the individual was arrested and the time the sample was obtained.

(h)  Driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance following diversion.--

(1)  An individual may not drive, operate or be in the actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle in violation of subsection (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) within 10 years after completing an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program or a pretrial diversion program substantially similar to Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in another jurisdiction, for an offense under this section or a substantially similar offense in another jurisdiction.

(2)  Any of the following shall constitute sufficient proof that the defendant has, within the last 10 years, completed an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program or a pretrial diversion program substantially similar to Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in another jurisdiction for an offense under this section or a substantially similar offense in another jurisdiction:

(i)  a certified record of the department pursuant to section 6328 (relating to admissibility of department records);

(ii)  a record maintained by the clerk of courts; or

(iii)  a substantially similar record from another jurisdiction.

(3)  Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing upon the question of whether the defendant has, within the last 10 years, completed an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program or a pretrial diversion program substantially similar to Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in another jurisdiction for an offense under this section or a substantially similar offense in another jurisdiction.

(May 11, 2006, P.L.155, No.36, eff. imd.; Dec. 22, 2025, P.L.363, No.58, eff. imd.)

 

2025 Amendment.  Act 58 amended subsec. (g) and added subsec. (h). See section 8 of Act 58 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to findings and declarations.

2006 Amendment.  See the preamble to Act 36 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to legislative intent.

Cross References.  Section 3802 is referred to in sections 1534, 1539, 1541, 1543, 1547, 1552, 1553, 1554, 1575, 1586, 1604, 1611, 3326, 3327, 3716, 3732, 3732.1, 3733, 3735, 3735.1, 3755, 3803, 3804, 3805, 3805.1, 3806, 3807, 3811, 3812, 3814, 3815, 3816, 3817, 6506 of this title; section 14301 of Title 16 (Counties); sections 6105, 7508.1 of Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses); section 5502 of Title 30 (Fish); section 8137 of Title 35 (Health and Safety); sections 933, 1515, 1725.3, 1725.5, 3571, 3573 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,332 cases (428 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Segida, 985 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2009).
Commonwealth v. Segida, 985 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2009). · cites it 45× “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802 (emphasis added to text of subsection (a)(1)).”
Com. v. Westlake, C., 295 A.3d 1281, 2023 PA Super 94 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). · cites it 16× “1See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(ii) and (iii). In a separate bench trial at this docket, Appellant was also convicted of the summary offense of driving an unregistered vehicle in violation of 75 Pa.”
Com. v. Stone, R., 273 A.3d 1163, 2022 PA Super 65 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). · cites it 14× “The Commonwealth argues that the trial court erred when it agreed to instruct the jury that (1) medical marijuana is not a Schedule I controlled substance under Pennsylvania law;1 and (2) in order to convict Appellee of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in violation of 75…”
Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007). · cites it 8× “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). [2] ¶ 15 Pursuant to Section 3802(a)(1), if a person imbibes enough alcohol to make that person incapable of safely driving, he or she may not thereafter operate a vehicle.”
Commonwealth v. Myers, D., 164 A.3d 1162 (Pa. 2017). · cites it 5× “7 Myers argued that Officer Bragg lacked probable cause to arrest him for DUI, and that the blood draw 5 See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and…”
Commonwealth v. Duda, 923 A.2d 1138 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 12× “" 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731 (repealed); see 1 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019). · cites it 4× “§ 3802(b); 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1); 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(31); 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Starry, 196 A.3d 649 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 10× “Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence[:] one count under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1), general impairment, and one count under 75 Pa.”
Dwayne Harvard v. Christopher Cesnalis, 973 F.3d 190 (3d Cir. 2020). · cites it 3× “§ 5503 (a)(4)); and (6) driving under the influence of a controlled substance ( 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802 (d)(2)).1 In the affidavit, Cesnalis referred to Sutton as “the victim” and entirely credited Sutton’s version of events.”
Commonwealth v. Jones, 121 A.3d 524 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 5× “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802. The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.”
Commonwealth v. Mobley, 14 A.3d 887 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011). · cites it 6× “3 The refusal of a blood alcohol content (“BAC”) test is not a separate element under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; rather, those who refuse a BAC test must be charged pursuant to 75 Pa.”
Com. v. May, R., 271 A.3d 475, 2022 PA Super 25 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). · cites it 6× “Appellant proceeded to trial on a charge of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(i), DUI of a controlled substance, which provides: (d) Controlled substances.”
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(0)(3): 1 case
Com. v. Morrisroe, P., No. 1265 WDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Dec. 23, 2020).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(1)(iii): 2 cases
Com. v. Given, S., 2020 PA Super 296.
Com. v. Given, S., 244 A.3d 508, 2020 PA Super 296 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(2): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Ciccola, 894 A.2d 744 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(A)(1): 5 cases
Com. v. Gruver, B., No. 1876 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 9, 2017).
Com. v. Hayden, A., No. 431 EDA 2023 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 15, 2024).
Com. v. Porter, G., No. 692 WDA 2023 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 29, 2024).
Com. v. Keyes, R., No. 754 MDA 2024 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 21, 2024).
Com. v. Falzone, M., No. 981 MDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct. June 5, 2026).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(B): 2 cases
Com. v. Gruver, B., No. 1876 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 9, 2017).
Com. v. Gomez, M., No. 1737 WDA 2013 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 22, 2014).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(C): 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Hughes, 908 A.2d 924 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).
Com. v. Myers, L., No. 428 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 5, 2016).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(D)(1): 1 case
Com. v. Markus, E., No. 1448 WDA 2021 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2022).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(D)(1)(iii): 1 case
Com. v. Alterio, C., No. 2147 MDA 2013 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 29, 2014).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(D)(2): 2 cases
Com. v. Pammer, K., 232 A.3d 931, 2020 PA Super 119 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Com. v. Pammer, K., 2020 PA Super 119.
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a): 71 cases
Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). [2] ¶ 15 Pursuant to Section 3802(a)(1), if a person imbibes enough alcohol to make that person incapable of safely driving, he or she may not thereafter operate a vehicle.”
Commonwealth v. Myers, D., 164 A.3d 1162 (Pa. 2017). “7 Myers argued that Officer Bragg lacked probable cause to arrest him for DUI, and that the blood draw 5 See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and…”
Commonwealth v. Duda, 923 A.2d 1138 (Pa. 2007). “" 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731 (repealed); see 1 Pa.”
Pennsylvania Dep't of Transp. v. Weaver, 912 A.2d 259 (Pa. 2006).
Commonwealth v. Jones, 121 A.3d 524 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802. The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.”
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(1): 529 cases
Commonwealth v. Segida, 985 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2009). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802 (emphasis added to text of subsection (a)(1)).”
Commonwealth v. Myers, D., 164 A.3d 1162 (Pa. 2017). “7 Myers argued that Officer Bragg lacked probable cause to arrest him for DUI, and that the blood draw 5 See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and…”
Commonwealth v. Mobley, 14 A.3d 887 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011). “3 The refusal of a blood alcohol content (“BAC”) test is not a separate element under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; rather, those who refuse a BAC test must be charged pursuant to 75 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019). “§ 3802(b); 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1); 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(31); 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. McGarry, 172 A.3d 60 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(1)(c): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Sands, 887 A.2d 261 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2005).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(1)(i): 1 case
Com. v. Rojas, E., No. 1077 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 20, 2018).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(2): 66 cases
Com. v. Lutz, A., 270 A.3d 571, 2022 PA Super 24 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
Commonwealth v. Duda, 923 A.2d 1138 (Pa. 2007). “" 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731 (repealed); see 1 Pa.”
Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U., 170 A.3d 399 (Pa. 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(I): 2 cases
Com. v. Alvarado, O., No. 1692 EDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 28, 2017).
Com. v. Neal, T., No. 612 EDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 6, 2015).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(J): 1 case
Com. v. Camacho, M., No. 1925 EDA 2013 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 23, 2015).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(a)(l): 14 cases
Commonwealth v. McNair, 8 Pa. D. & C.5th 262 (2009).
Com. v. Zeller, T., No. 1135 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 7, 2016).
Com. v. Braddock, K., No. 1998 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 13, 2017).
Commonwealth v. Watson, 5 Pa. D. & C.5th 28 (2008).
Com. v. Pena, E., No. 1452 EDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 21, 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(b): 103 cases
Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019). “§ 3802(b); 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1); 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(31); 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
Commonwealth v. Taylor, T., 104 A.3d 479 (Pa. 2014).
Commonwealth v. Duda, 923 A.2d 1138 (Pa. 2007). “" 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802; 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731 (repealed); see 1 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Hlubin, M., 208 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2019).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(c): 193 cases
Commonwealth v. Segida, 985 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2009). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802 (emphasis added to text of subsection (a)(1)).”
Commonwealth v. Segida, 912 A.2d 841 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).
Commonwealth v. Cauley, 10 A.3d 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010).
Commonwealth v. Starry, 196 A.3d 649 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence[:] one count under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1), general impairment, and one count under 75 Pa.”
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(c)(1): 1 case
Com. v. Snyder, K., No. 1400 WDA 2024 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 23, 2025).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d): 35 cases
Commonwealth v. Jones, 121 A.3d 524 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802. The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.”
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 32 A.3d 1231 (Pa. 2011).
Commonwealth v. DiPanfilo, 993 A.2d 1262 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010).
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 985 A.2d 230 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(1): 48 cases
Com. v. Stone, R., 273 A.3d 1163, 2022 PA Super 65 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). “The Commonwealth argues that the trial court erred when it agreed to instruct the jury that (1) medical marijuana is not a Schedule I controlled substance under Pennsylvania law;1 and (2) in order to convict Appellee of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in violation of 75…”
Commonwealth v. Ennels, 167 A.3d 716 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Com. v. Lutz, A., 270 A.3d 571, 2022 PA Super 24 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
Commonwealth v. Etchison, 916 A.2d 1169 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
Commonwealth v. Garibay, 106 A.3d 136 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(1)(i): 81 cases
Com. v. May, R., 271 A.3d 475, 2022 PA Super 25 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). “Appellant proceeded to trial on a charge of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(i), DUI of a controlled substance, which provides: (d) Controlled substances.”
Com. v. Stone, R., 273 A.3d 1163, 2022 PA Super 65 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). “The Commonwealth argues that the trial court erred when it agreed to instruct the jury that (1) medical marijuana is not a Schedule I controlled substance under Pennsylvania law;1 and (2) in order to convict Appellee of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in violation of 75…”
Commonwealth v. Popielarcheck, A., 190 A.3d 1137 (Pa. 2018).
Com. v. Prince, A., 320 A.3d 698, 2024 PA Super 156 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
Com. v. Beauchamps, N., 320 A.3d 717, 2024 PA Super 160 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(1)(ii): 24 cases
Com. v. Westlake, C., 295 A.3d 1281, 2023 PA Super 94 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). “1See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(ii) and (iii). In a separate bench trial at this docket, Appellant was also convicted of the summary offense of driving an unregistered vehicle in violation of 75 Pa.”
Com. v. McNamara, J., No. 1854 EDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 6, 2015).
Com. v. Rodriguez, M., No. 549 MDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 13, 2016).
Com. v. Martin, K., No. 1951 MDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. June 22, 2017).
Com. v. Ford, C., No. 620 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 30, 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(1)(iii): 26 cases
Com. v. Westlake, C., 295 A.3d 1281, 2023 PA Super 94 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). “1See 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(ii) and (iii). In a separate bench trial at this docket, Appellant was also convicted of the summary offense of driving an unregistered vehicle in violation of 75 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Jones, 121 A.3d 524 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802. The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.”
Com. v. Vela-Garrett, A., 251 A.3d 811, 2021 PA Super 78 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Com. v. Bell, S., 229 A.3d 334 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Com. v. Given, S., 2020 PA Super 296.
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(2): 135 cases
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 985 A.2d 230 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009).
Commonwealth v. DiPanfilo, 993 A.2d 1262 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010).
Com. v. May, R., 271 A.3d 475, 2022 PA Super 25 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). “Appellant proceeded to trial on a charge of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d)(1)(i), DUI of a controlled substance, which provides: (d) Controlled substances.”
Commonwealth v. Roser, 914 A.2d 447 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).
Commonwealth v. Taylor, 209 A.3d 444 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(2)(i): 1 case
Com. v. Kling, J., 2026 PA Super 11.
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(3): 31 cases
Com. v. Duncan, H., 314 A.3d 556, 2024 PA Super 75 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
Com. v. Foust, M., No. 706 WDA 2023 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 14, 2024).
Com. v. Eastman, N., No. 893 MDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 13, 2017).
Com. v. Myers, D., No. 317 MDA 2023 (Pa. Super. Ct. Oct. 25, 2023).
Com. v. Kemp, S., No. 873 EDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 17, 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(ii): 1 case
Com. v. Kent, J., No. 2367 EDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 27, 2015).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(iii): 1 case
Com. v. Rodriguez, M., No. 549 MDA 2016 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 13, 2016).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(l): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 32 A.3d 1231 (Pa. 2011).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(l)(i): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Anthony, 1 A.3d 914 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(d)(l)(ii): 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Weaver, 76 A.3d 562 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013).
Ramos v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 683 F. App'x 125 (3d Cir. 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(e): 9 cases
Commonwealth v. Love, 957 A.2d 765 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
Clark v. Commonwealth, 62 A.3d 1059 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
Com. v. Krause, D., No. 1455 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. June 7, 2016).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(f)(1)(i): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J., 255 A.3d 438 (Pa. 2021).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(f)(3): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Maguire, 175 A.3d 288 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(g): 21 cases
Commonwealth v. Eichler, 133 A.3d 775 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)-(c). [2] ¶ 15 Pursuant to Section 3802(a)(1), if a person imbibes enough alcohol to make that person incapable of safely driving, he or she may not thereafter operate a vehicle.”
Commonwealth v. Starry, 196 A.3d 649 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence[:] one count under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1), general impairment, and one count under 75 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Starry, M., 224 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2020).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(g)(1): 6 cases
Commonwealth v. Starry, 196 A.3d 649 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence[:] one count under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1), general impairment, and one count under 75 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Starry, M., 204 A.3d 369 (Pa. 2019).
Commonwealth v. Starry, M., 224 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2020).
Com. v. Olszewski, J., No. 1416 MDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. June 15, 2015).
Com. v. McBride, D., No. 1711 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 8, 2016).
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802(g)(2): 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Starry, 196 A.3d 649 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence[:] one count under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1), general impairment, and one count under 75 Pa.”
Com. v. Koger, C., No. 1428 WDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 19, 2019).
Commonwealth v. Starry, M., 224 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2020).
Com. v. Shedden, Jr., J, No. 964 MDA 2023 (Pa. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2024).
Com. v. Smith, W., No. 2143 MDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 18, 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.