Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-5-16 (2026)

Power to prevent unlawful practices — Preference for informal methods

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commission is empowered and directed, as subsequently provided, to prevent any person from engaging in unlawful employment practices, provided that before instituting the formal hearing authorized by §§ 28-5-18 — 28-5-27, it shall attempt, by informal methods of conference, persuasion, and conciliation, to induce compliance with this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2020 · leading case: Power v. City of Providence, 582 A.2d 895 (R.I. 1990).
Power v. City of Providence, 582 A.2d 895 (R.I. 1990). “See § 28-5-16; see also Providence Firefighters Local 799 v.”
Paulo v. Cooley, Inc., 686 F. Supp. 377 (D.R.I. 1988). · cites it 2× “” R.I.Gen.Laws § 28-5-16. If these informal methods are unsuccessful, the Commission may issue a complaint against an employer within one year after the alleged unfair employment practices were committed.”
In Re Rhode Island Comm'n for Human Rights, 472 A.2d 1211 (R.I. 1984). “*1213 The commission is empowered and directed by the terms of § 28-5-16 to prevent any person from engaging in any of the unlawful employment practices set forth in the act, but before a formal hearing can be conducted pursuant to the provisions of §§ 28-5-18 to 28-5-27…”
Kriegel v. Rhode Island, Dep't of Corr., 266 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.R.I. 2003). “…of §§ 42-87-1 — 42-87-4, the commission may proceed in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in §§ 28-5-16 — 28-5-26, and the provisions of §§ 28-5-13 and 28-5-16 — 28-5-36, as to the powers, duties and rights of the commission, its members, hearing…”
Rosalino v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (D.R.I. 2020). “General Laws §§ 11-24-1 through 11/24/3, the RICHR proceeds per §§ 28-5-16 through 28/5/26. Section 28-5-17 mandates a one-year statute of limitations on claims for discrimination under the public accommodations law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.