The holder of a Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, or Class J license who
applies before October 1 in any licensing period for a license of the same class for
the next succeeding licensing period is prima facie entitled to renewal to the extent
that the license is issuable under § 3-5-16. This application may be rejected for cause, subject to appeal as provided in § 3-7-21. A person whose application has been rejected by the local licensing authorities
shall, for the purpose of license quotas under § 3-5-16, be deemed to have been granted a license until the period for an appeal has expired
or until his or her appeal has been dismissed. The license holder may be required
to pay a twenty-five dollar ($25.00) fee upon application of renewal, at the option
of local licensing authorities. This fee shall be used by the local licensing authority
for advertising and administrative costs related to processing the renewal application.
Notes of Decisions
A.J.C. Enter., Inc. v. Pastore, 473 A.2d 269 (R.I. 1984).
· cites it 3× “1956 (1976 Reenactment) § 3-7-6 and refused to examine § 3-5-23 for identical infirmities.”
Edge-January, Inc. v. Pastore, 430 A.2d 1063 (R.I. 1981).
· cites it 3× “The petitioner contends that no such direct nexus can be established in the instant case because there were other establishments in the area which sold or served liquor, any of which could have been the source of the disorderly incidents in the neighborhood.”
DeFalco v. Voccola, 557 A.2d 474 (R.I. 1989).
· cites it 3× “It is set forth in § 3-7-6 that the holder of a class-B license (as well as holders of other types of licenses) “shall be prima facie entitled to renewal thereof to the extent that the same are issuable under § 3-5-16.”
Mathieu v. Bd. of License Commissioners, 343 A.2d 1 (R.I. 1975).
· cites it 3× “Here, in our opinion, the controlling statute is §3-7-6, 2 as amended by P. L. 1961, ch. 164, §1, which sets forth the procedure for the renewal of liquor licenses.”
Vitterito v. Sportsman's Lodge & Restaurant, Inc., 228 A.2d 119 (R.I. 1967).
· cites it 2× “1956, §3-7-6, as amended, the holder of a class A, B or C license who applied before November 15- of the year in which his license expired (became prima facie entitled to- a renewal thereof.”
Beacon Restaurant, Inc. v. Adamo, 241 A.2d 291 (R.I. 1968).
“The legislature has recognized this quality by providing in §3-7-6, as amended, that a holder of a class A, B or C license who applies prior to November 15 of the year in which his license expires is prima facie entitled to a renewal thereof.”
28 Prospect Hill St., Inc. v. Gaines, 461 A.2d 923 (R.I. 1983).
· cites it 2× “1956 (1976 Reenactment) § 3-7-6 (1982 Cum.Supp.), which provide that any holder of a license of Class A (retail liquor store) or Class B (tavern keeper or victualer) or Class C (saloon keeper) or Class D (club) “who applies before October 1 in any licensing period for a license…”
Vitterito v. Sportsman's Lodge & Restaurant, Etc., 228 A.2d 119 (R.I. 1967).
· cites it 3× “1, now G.L. 1956, § 3-7-6, as amended, the holder of a class A, B or C license who applied before November 15 of the year in which his license expired became prima facie entitled to a renewal thereof.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.