Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3 (2026)

Right to inspect and copy records — Duty to maintain minutes of meetings — Procedures for access

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in § 38-2-2(4), all records maintained or kept on file by any public body, whether or not those records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person or entity shall have the right to inspect and/or copy those records at such reasonable time as may be determined by the custodian thereof.

(b) Any reasonably segregable portion of a public record excluded by § 38-2-2(4) shall be available for public inspection after the deletion of the information which is the basis of the exclusion. If an entire document or record is deemed non-public, the public body shall state in writing that no portion of the document or record contains reasonable segregable information that is releasable.

(c) Each public body shall make, keep, and maintain written or recorded minutes of all meetings.

(d) Each public body shall establish written procedures regarding access to public records but shall not require written requests for public information available pursuant to § 42-35-2 or for other documents prepared for or readily available to the public.

These procedures must include, but need not be limited to, the identification of a designated public records officer or unit, how to make a public records request, and where a public record request should be made, and a copy of these procedures shall be posted on the public body’s website if such a website is maintained and be made otherwise readily available to the public. The unavailability of a designated public records officer shall not be deemed good cause for failure to timely comply with a request to inspect and/or copy public records pursuant to subsection (e). A written request for public records need not be made on a form established by a public body if the request is otherwise readily identifiable as a request for public records.

(e) A public body receiving a request shall permit the inspection or copying within ten (10) business days after receiving a request. If the inspection or copying is not permitted within ten (10) business days, the public body shall forthwith explain in writing the need for additional time to comply with the request. Any such explanation must be particularized to the specific request made. In such cases the public body may have up to an additional twenty (20) business days to comply with the request if it can demonstrate that the voluminous nature of the request, the number of requests for records pending, or the difficulty in searching for and retrieving or copying the requested records, is such that additional time is necessary to avoid imposing an undue burden on the public body.

(f) If a public record is in active use or in storage and, therefore, not available at the time a person or entity requests access, the custodian shall so inform the person or entity and make an appointment for the person or entity to examine such records as expeditiously as they may be made available.

(g) Any person or entity requesting copies of public records may elect to obtain them in any and all media in which the public agency is capable of providing them. Any public body which maintains its records in a computer storage system shall provide any data properly identified in a printout or other reasonable format, as requested.

(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a public body to reorganize, consolidate, or compile data not maintained by the public body in the form requested at the time the request to inspect the public records was made except to the extent that such records are in an electronic format and the public body would not be unduly burdened in providing such data.

(i) Nothing in this section is intended to affect the public record status of information merely because it is stored in a computer.

(j) No public records shall be withheld based on the purpose for which the records are sought, nor shall a public body require, as a condition of fulfilling a public records request, that a person or entity provide a reason for the request or provide personally identifiable information about him/herself.

(k) At the election of the person or entity requesting the public records, the public body shall provide copies of the public records electronically, by facsimile, or by mail in accordance with the requesting person or entity’s choice, unless complying with that preference would be unduly burdensome due to the volume of records requested or the costs that would be incurred. The person requesting delivery shall be responsible for the actual cost of delivery, if any.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Providence Journal Co. v. Convention Ctr. Auth., 774 A.2d 40 (R.I. 2001).
Providence Journal Co. v. Convention Ctr. Auth., 774 A.2d 40 (R.I. 2001). · cites it 18× “In fact, in addition to the "electronic format" exemption underscored above, § 38-2-3(e) (as amended in P.L. 1998, ch.”
Downey v. Carcieri, 996 A.2d 1144 (R.I. 2010). · cites it 2× “Section 38-2-3(a) provides that “every person or entity shall have the right to inspect and/or copy [public] records * * Because the denial of access to a public record could itself constitute harm, the Superior Court justice found that plaintiffs had standing under the APRA.”
Direct Action for Rights & Equality v. Gannon, 713 A.2d 218 (R.I. 1998). · cites it 2× “With respect to DARE's request to obtain a listing of all findings from investigations that were conducted by the Bureau of Internal Affairs, request (b), we note that pursuant to § 38-2-3(f), the city is not required "to reorganize, consolidate, or compile data not maintained…”
Pawtucket Teachers All. Local No. 920 v. Brady, 556 A.2d 556 (R.I. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 38-2-3, as amended by P.L.1984, ch.”
Providence Journal Co. v. Sundlun, 616 A.2d 1131 (R.I. 1992). · cites it 2× “” Section 38-2-3(a). Embodied in § 38-2-2(d), however, are twenty-two categories of exceptions that were intended to limit the public’s access when disclosure would reveal personal or confidential information about an individual.”
Hatch v. Town of Middletown, 311 F.3d 83 (1st Cir. 2002). “” R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(a). Hence, sections 38-2-2(4)(i)(D) and 38-2-3(a) impose an affirmative obligation on law enforcement agencies to make arrest records available to the public.”
Bernard v. Vose, 730 A.2d 30 (R.I. 1999). · cites it 3× “The Access to Public Records Act (or act) opens public records to inspection by the general public, § 38-2-3(a), *32 regardless of “the purposes for which the records are sought.”
The Rake v. Gorodetsky, 452 A.2d 1144 (R.I. 1982). “The Rake’s request was made pursuant to § 38-2-3, which provides that all records kept on file by any public body shall be made public subject to certain enumerated exceptions.”
Hydron Labs., Inc. v. DEPT. OF ATTY. GEN., 492 A.2d 135 (R.I. 1985). “" Although § 38-2-3 of APRA states that "all records maintained or kept on file by any public body * * * shall be public records and every person shall have the right to inspect and/or copy such records," certain definitional limitations were included in respect to which…”
Blais v. the Beacon Mut. Ins. Co., 812 A.2d 838 (R.I. 2002). “the public inspection requirements of § 38-2-3(a). Beacon is a non-profit public corporation created in December 1990 by legislative charter pursuant to chapter 7.”
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc v. Les Range, 594 F. App'x 813 (5th Cir. 2014). “701 ("public records”); R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3 ("public records”); S.”
Hydron Labs., Inc. v. Dep't of Attorney Gen. ex rel. State, 492 A.2d 133 (R.I. 1985). “” Although § 38-2-3 of APRA states that “all records maintained or kept on file by any public body * * * shall be public records and every person shall have the right to inspect and/or copy such records,” certain definitional limitations were included in respect to which…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(a) — 5 cases
Downey v. Carcieri, 996 A.2d 1144 (R.I. 2010). “Section 38-2-3(a) provides that “every person or entity shall have the right to inspect and/or copy [public] records * * Because the denial of access to a public record could itself constitute harm, the Superior Court justice found that plaintiffs had standing under the APRA.”
Providence Journal Co. v. Sundlun, 616 A.2d 1131 (R.I. 1992). “” Section 38-2-3(a). Embodied in § 38-2-2(d), however, are twenty-two categories of exceptions that were intended to limit the public’s access when disclosure would reveal personal or confidential information about an individual.”
Hatch v. Town of Middletown, 311 F.3d 83 (1st Cir. 2002). “” R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(a). Hence, sections 38-2-2(4)(i)(D) and 38-2-3(a) impose an affirmative obligation on law enforcement agencies to make arrest records available to the public.”
Bernard v. Vose, 730 A.2d 30 (R.I. 1999). “The Access to Public Records Act (or act) opens public records to inspection by the general public, § 38-2-3(a), *32 regardless of “the purposes for which the records are sought.”
Blais v. the Beacon Mut. Ins. Co., 812 A.2d 838 (R.I. 2002). “the public inspection requirements of § 38-2-3(a). Beacon is a non-profit public corporation created in December 1990 by legislative charter pursuant to chapter 7.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(e) — 1 case
Providence Journal Co. v. Convention Ctr. Auth., 774 A.2d 40 (R.I. 2001). “In fact, in addition to the "electronic format" exemption underscored above, § 38-2-3(e) (as amended in P.L. 1998, ch.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(f) — 2 cases
Providence Journal Co. v. Convention Ctr. Auth., 774 A.2d 40 (R.I. 2001). “In fact, in addition to the "electronic format" exemption underscored above, § 38-2-3(e) (as amended in P.L. 1998, ch.”
Direct Action for Rights & Equality v. Gannon, 713 A.2d 218 (R.I. 1998). “With respect to DARE's request to obtain a listing of all findings from investigations that were conducted by the Bureau of Internal Affairs, request (b), we note that pursuant to § 38-2-3(f), the city is not required "to reorganize, consolidate, or compile data not maintained…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-3(h) — 2 cases
Bernard v. Vose, 730 A.2d 30 (R.I. 1999). “The Access to Public Records Act (or act) opens public records to inspection by the general public, § 38-2-3(a), *32 regardless of “the purposes for which the records are sought.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.