(a) A person may petition an agency for a declaratory order that interprets or applies
a statute administered by the agency or states whether, or in what manner, a rule,
guidance document, or order issued by the agency applies to the petitioner.
(b) An agency shall promulgate rules prescribing the form of a petition under subsection
(a) and the procedure for its submission, consideration, and prompt disposition. The
provisions of this chapter concerning formal, informal, or other applicable hearing
procedure do not apply to an agency proceeding for a declaratory order, except to
the extent provided in this section or to the extent the agency provides by rule or
order.
(c) Not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of a petition under subsection (a), an
agency shall issue a declaratory order in response to the petition, decline to issue
the order, or schedule the matter for further consideration.
(d) If an agency declines to issue a declaratory order requested under subsection (a),
it shall notify, promptly, the petitioner of its decision. The decision must be in
a record and must include a brief statement of the reasons for declining. An agency
decision to decline to issue a declaratory order is subject to judicial review for
abuse of discretion. An agency failure to act within the applicable time under subsection
(c) is subject to judicial action under § 42-35-15.
(e) If an agency issues a declaratory order, the order must contain the names of all parties
to the proceeding, the facts on which it is based, and the reasons for the agency’s
conclusion. If an agency is authorized not to disclose certain information in its
records to protect confidentiality, the agency may redact confidential information
in the order. The order has the same status and binding effect as an order issued
in a contested case and is subject to judicial review under § 42-35-15.
(f) An agency shall publish each currently effective declaratory order on its agency website.
(g) An agency shall maintain a current and publicly accessible index of all of its currently
effective declaratory orders on its website; file the index with the secretary of
state; make the index readily available for public inspection; and make available
for public inspection and, for a reasonable charge, copying the full text of all declaratory
orders to the extent inspection is permitted by law of this state other than this
chapter. Declaratory orders are effective only if filed with the secretary of state.
Notes of Decisions
Romano v. Ret. Bd. of the Employees' Ret. Sys., 767 A.2d 35 (R.I. 2001).
· cites it 6× “" See G.L.1956 § 42-35-8 (empowering agencies like the board to issue advisory opinions "as to the applicability of any statutory provision or of any rule or order of the agency").”
Liguori v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 384 A.2d 308 (R.I. 1978).
· cites it 11× “He found that the commissioner lacked the authority to order reinstatement and also pointed out that the most the commissioner could do was to invoke §42-35-8 of the Administrative Procedures Act and issue a declaratory ruling as to whether Regulation 16 applied to Keough’s…”
Pawtucket Power Assocs. Ltd. v. City of Pawtucket, 622 A.2d 452 (R.I. 1993).
· cites it 5× “On February 3, 1989, the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission (the ‘PUC’) issued a Declaratory Judgment (the ‘PUC Order’) pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-35-8 that PPA’s ownership and operation of the Facility as set forth herein would not cause PPA to become a ‘public…”
Greenwich Bay Yacht Basin Assocs. v. Brown, 537 A.2d 988 (R.I. 1988).
· cites it 3× “1956 (1984 Reenactment) § 42-35-8. Presumably, such a petition could have been limited to the question of whether the 1978 or the 1983 program criteria would be utilized in adjudicating Greenwich’s application.”
Rhode Island Chamber of Com. v. Hackett, 411 A.2d 300 (R.I. 1980).
“The Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce pursuant to §42-35-8 requested the Director of Employment Security to rule on the effect of the Governor’s decision authorizing the suspension of the one-week waiting period required by G.”
Malachowski v. State, 877 A.2d 649 (R.I. 2005).
“The term includes the amendment or repeal of a prior rule, but does not include (1) statements concerning only the internal management of an agency and not affecting private rights or procedures available to the public, or (2) declaratory rulings issued pursuant to § 42-35-8,…”
Ambeault v. Burrillville Racing Ass'n, 373 A.2d 807 (R.I. 1977).
“It is to be found in the Administrative Procedures Act, specifically §42-35-8. The statute permits an individual to petition an agency and •ask for a declaratory ruling as to the applicability of the agency’s rule to the petitioner’s particular circumstances.”
Newbay Corp. v. Annarummo, 587 A.2d 63 (R.I. 1991).
“The term includes the amendment or repeal of a prior rule, but does not include (1) statements concerning only the internal management of an agency and not affecting private rights or procedures available to the public, or (2) declaratory rulings issued pursuant to § 42-35-8,…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-35-8(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.