Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 44-9-8.3 (2026)

Sale of owner-occupied residential property to housing agency

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Where the property subject to tax sale is owner-occupied residential and contains three (3) or less units, the Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation shall have a right of first refusal to acquire the tax lien at tax sale, and may assist the owner to discharge the lien or take title and acquire the property in its own name pursuant to regulations to be developed by the corporation, consistent with its purposes. The corporation shall notify the collector of its intention to exercise this right by the later of: (i) thirty (30) days from its receipt of the certified mail notice set forth in § 44-9-10; or (ii) ten (10) days before the date of sale or any adjournment of the sale. Failure of the corporation to notify the collector as provided herein shall extinguish the right of first refusal provided in this section.

(b) There shall be an advisory board consisting of six (6) members: one person appointed by the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns; one person appointed by the Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Rhode Island; one person appointed by Rhode Island Legal Services; one person appointed by the Housing Network of Rhode Island, one appointed by the Urban League of Rhode Island and one appointed by the Center for Hispanic Policy and Advocacy. The advisory committee shall provide advice and recommendations to the governing board of the Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation regarding that corporation’s activities under this section. The members of the advisory board shall receive no compensation for the performance of their duties, but may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in carrying out their duties.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Rhode Island Hous. & Mortg. Fin. Corp. v. Edward Gordon (R.I. 2022).
Rhode Island Hous. & Mortg. Fin. Corp. v. Edward Gordon (R.I. 2022). · cites it 8× “3 3 Although we are unable to conclude that RIHMFC owed Gordon a duty based on the clear language of the statute, we do note the salutary purposes of the Madeline Walker Act, as codified in G.L. 1956 § 44-9-8.3. According to RIHMFC’s website, “[t]he Madeline Walker Act is a…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 44-9-8.3(a) — 1 case
Rhode Island Hous. & Mortg. Fin. Corp. v. Edward Gordon (R.I. 2022). “3 3 Although we are unable to conclude that RIHMFC owed Gordon a duty based on the clear language of the statute, we do note the salutary purposes of the Madeline Walker Act, as codified in G.L. 1956 § 44-9-8.3. According to RIHMFC’s website, “[t]he Madeline Walker Act is a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.