Rhode Island General Laws
R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-2-12 (2026)
Injury to business reputation — Dilution
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Likelihood of injury to business reputation or of dilution of the distinctive quality of a mark registered under this chapter or a mark valid at common law or a trade name valid at common law shall be a ground for injunctive relief notwithstanding the absence of competition between the parties or the absence of confusion as to the source of goods or services.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: Beacon Mut. Ins. v. Onebeacon Ins. Grp., 376 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2004).
Beacon Mut. Ins. v. Onebeacon Ins. Grp., 376 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2004). “§ 1125 (a); Count II alleged unfair competition under Rhode Island common law; Count III alleged service mark infringement under Rhode Island common law; and Count IV alleged trademark dilution under R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-2-12. OneBeacon removed the case to federal court and then…”
Miller Brewing Co. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 503 F. Supp. 896 (D.R.I. 1981). “G.L. § 6-2-12. Since 1972, Miller has brewed and marketed a reduced calorie beer called LITE.”
Beacon Mut. Ins. v. OneBeacon Ins. Grp., 290 F. Supp. 2d 241 (D.R.I. 2003). “State Dilution Claim R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-2-12 states: Injury to business reputation — Dilution.”
Wedgwood Homes, Inc. v. Lund, 659 P.2d 377 (Or. 1983). “107 (1981); RI Gen Laws § 6-2-12 (1982); Tenn Code Ann § 69-521 (1982) (repealed eff 1983).”
Sequin, LLC v. Kimberly Renk (D.R.I. 2020). “§§ 1114 , 1125(a), Count III relies on the Rhode Island common law of trademark infringement, and Count IV is grounded on R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-2-12 (injunctive relief for dilution of mark).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.