Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 6A-1-102 (2026)

Scope of chapter

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter applies to a transaction to the extent that it is governed by another chapter of Title 6A.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1978–2004 · leading case: McFarland v. Brier, 850 A.2d 965 (R.I. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McFarland v. Brier, 850 A.2d 965 (R.I. 2004). · cites it 2× “See G.L.1956 § 6A-1-102(2)(b) & cmt. See also In re Latin Investment Corp.”

Serra v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 463 A.2d 142 (R.I. 1983). · cites it 2× “” Section 6A-1-102(2). The restrictive and narrow construction of § 6A-9-110 that the trial justice adopted was inconsistent with this goal.”

Rhode Island Hosp. Trust Nat'l Bank v. Nat'l Health Found., 384 A.2d 301 (R.I. 1978). · cites it 2× “) Those obligations, the Foundation contends, were not satisfied because acceptance of its recommendations would have resulted in a better price being realized for the collateral.”

Gordon v. Clifford Metal Sales Co., 602 A.2d 535 (R.I. 1992). · cites it 2× “” Section 6A-1-102(2)(c). To that end it is only appropriate to apply the code to the instant transaction as it is virtually the sole body of law in the United States governing secured transactions.”

Thorp Credit Inc. v. Nason (In Re Nason), 13 B.R. 984 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1981). “” § 6A-1-102(2)(c); In re Copeland, supra; Weathersby v.”

— R.I. Gen. Laws § 6A-1-102(2) — 1 case

Serra v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 463 A.2d 142 (R.I. 1983). “” Section 6A-1-102(2). The restrictive and narrow construction of § 6A-9-110 that the trial justice adopted was inconsistent with this goal.”

— R.I. Gen. Laws § 6A-1-102(2)(b) — 1 case

McFarland v. Brier, 850 A.2d 965 (R.I. 2004). “See G.L.1956 § 6A-1-102(2)(b) & cmt. See also In re Latin Investment Corp.”

— R.I. Gen. Laws § 6A-1-102(2)(c) — 2 cases

Gordon v. Clifford Metal Sales Co., 602 A.2d 535 (R.I. 1992). “” Section 6A-1-102(2)(c). To that end it is only appropriate to apply the code to the instant transaction as it is virtually the sole body of law in the United States governing secured transactions.”

Thorp Credit Inc. v. Nason (In Re Nason), 13 B.R. 984 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1981). “” § 6A-1-102(2)(c); In re Copeland, supra; Weathersby v.”

— R.I. Gen. Laws § 6A-1-102(3) — 1 case

Rhode Island Hosp. Trust Nat'l Bank v. Nat'l Health Found., 384 A.2d 301 (R.I. 1978). “) Those obligations, the Foundation contends, were not satisfied because acceptance of its recommendations would have resulted in a better price being realized for the collateral.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.