(a) Whoever violates this chapter shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000),
or imprisoned not more than ten (10) years, or both, and forfeits to the state:
(1) Any property acquired or maintained in violation of this chapter;
(2) Any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds that were obtained directly
or indirectly from the commission of an offense in violation of this chapter;
(3) Any: (i) Interest in; (ii) Security of; (iii) Claim against; or (iv) Property or contractual
right of any kind affording a source of influence over; any enterprise that the person
has established, participated in, operated, controlled, or conducted in violation
of this chapter; provided that the value of the property forfeited shall not exceed
the sum of the money invested in violation of § 7-15-2(a) plus the appreciated value of the money.
(b) Upon conviction of a person under this chapter, the superior court shall authorize
the attorney general to seize all property or other interest declared forfeited under
this chapter on any terms and conditions as the court deems proper. The state shall
dispose of all property or other interest seized under this chapter as soon as feasible
making due provision for the rights of innocent persons. If a property right or other
interest is not exercisable or transferable for value by the state it expires and
does not revert to the convicted person.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1985–2004 · leading case:
State v. Brown, 486 A.2d 595 (R.I. 1985).
State v. Brown, 486 A.2d 595 (R.I. 1985).
· cites it 2× “In addition, the indictment requested that defendants’ interests in the enterprise, including all real and personal property, be subject to the forfeiture provisions of § 7-15-3. The alleged scheme involved the bribing of Brown and Gentile by the other three defendants to use…”
Ret. Bd. of Employees' Ret. Sys. v. DiPrete, 845 A.2d 270 (R.I. 2004).
“DiPrete apparently is referring to § 7-15-3(a)(3), which provides that “the value of the property forfeited shall not exceed the sum of the money invested in violation of § 7-15-2(a) plus the appreciated value of the money.”
Ret. Bd. of Employees'ret. Sys. v. Diprete, 845 A.2d 270 (R.I. 2004).
“DiPrete apparently is referring to § 7-15-3(a)(3), which provides that "the value of the property forfeited shall not exceed the sum of the money invested in violation of § 7-15-2(a) plus the appreciated value of the money.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-15-3(a)(3) — 2 cases
Ret. Bd. of Employees' Ret. Sys. v. DiPrete, 845 A.2d 270 (R.I. 2004).
“DiPrete apparently is referring to § 7-15-3(a)(3), which provides that “the value of the property forfeited shall not exceed the sum of the money invested in violation of § 7-15-2(a) plus the appreciated value of the money.”
Ret. Bd. of Employees'ret. Sys. v. Diprete, 845 A.2d 270 (R.I. 2004).
“DiPrete apparently is referring to § 7-15-3(a)(3), which provides that "the value of the property forfeited shall not exceed the sum of the money invested in violation of § 7-15-2(a) plus the appreciated value of the money.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.