Rhode Island General Laws
R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-4 (2026)
Comparative negligence
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In all actions hereafter brought for personal injuries, or where personal injuries have resulted in death, or for injury to property, the fact that the person injured, or the owner of the property or person having control over the property, may not have been in the exercise of due care or the fact that the danger or defect was open and obvious shall not bar a recovery, but damages shall be diminished by the finder of fact in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person injured, or the owner of the property or the person having control over the property.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: Calise v. Hidden Valley Condo. Ass'n, 773 A.2d 834 (R.I. 2001).
Calise v. Hidden Valley Condo. Ass'n, 773 A.2d 834 (R.I. 2001). “Because the defaulted defendants in this case "concede that the default against them operates as a bar to the introduction of any evidence on liability as against Plaintiff[s]," we have no need to decide whether to go as far as the Wyoming court and allow defaulted defendants to…”
Fiske v. MacGregor, Div. of Brunswick, 464 A.2d 719 (R.I. 1983). “1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 9-20-4, as amended by P.L.1972, ch. 18, § 1, should be applied to breach-of-implied-warranty actions and to strict-liability actions.”
Kennedy v. Providence Hockey Club, Inc., 376 A.2d 329 (R.I. 1977). “On appeal the Kennedys argue that we should abandon assumption of the risk as a distinct defense to negligence actions, treat it like contributory negligence, and deem it subsumed by the comparative negligence statute, G.”
Gliottone v. Ethier, 870 A.2d 1022 (R.I. 2005). “6 Pursuant to *1029 G.L.1956 § 9-20-4, a plaintiff in a negligence action is entitled to an award of damages if he can prove the negligence of the defendant, although his damages will be reduced in proportion to his own fault.”
Raymond v. Jenard, 390 A.2d 358 (R.I. 1978). “The plaintiffs, while recognizing that retrospectve operation of a statute is not favored by the courts, nonetheless argue that the opening phrase of the comparative negligence statute, “[i]n all actions hereafter brought,” unambiguously manifests a legislative intention that…”
Gustafson v. Benda, 661 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. 1983). “Code Ann. § 2315.19 (Page 1982); Okla.Stat.Ann.”
Est. of Braswell Ex Rel. Braswell v. People's Credit Union, 602 A.2d 510 (R.I. 1992). “General Laws 1956 (1985 Reenactment) § 9-20-4 provides for comparative negligence in causes of action with respect to injury to the person or to property.”
Najarian v. Nat'l Amusements, Inc., 768 A.2d 1253 (R.I. 2001). “G.L.1956 § 9-20-4. The motion was denied, and the trial justice applied Rhode Island negligence law.”
McIntyre v. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d 52 (Tenn. 1992). “1991); R.I.Gen.Laws § 9-20-4 (1985); S.D. Codified Laws Ann.”
Graff v. Motta, 748 A.2d 249 (R.I. 2000). “Prior to trial, defense counsel informed the trial justice that the defendants were waiving any reliance upon verdict reduction benefits provided by G.L.1956 § 9-20-4. The trial justice, in reliance upon the defendants’ concession, instructed the jury not to consider whether the…”
Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co., 256 S.E.2d 879 (W. Va. 1979). “1978); R.I. Gen. Laws §9-20-4 (Supp. 1978); S.D.”
Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713 (Ky. 1984). “(25) Rhode Island, R.I.Gen.Laws §§ 9-20-4, -4.1 (Supp. 1982).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.