U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5

Repeat and Dangerous Sex Offender Against Minors

Read at: USSCussc.gov CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)       In any case in which the defendant's instant offense of conviction is a covered sex crime, §4B1.1 (Career Offender) does not apply, and the defendant committed the instant offense of conviction subsequent to sustaining at least one sex offense conviction:

(1)       The offense level shall be the greater of:

(A)       the offense level determined under Chapters Two and Three; or

(B)       the offense level from the table below decreased by the number of levels corresponding to any applicable adjustment from §3E1.1 (Acceptance of Responsibility):

Offense Statutory Maximum  Offense Level
   
(i)Life37
(ii)25 years or more34
(iii)20 years or more, but less than 25 years32
(iv)15 years or more, but less than 20 years29
(v)10 years or more, but less than 15 years24
(vi)5 years or more, but less than 10 years17
(vii)More than 1 year, but less than 5 years12.

(2)       The criminal history category shall be the greater of:  (A) the criminal history category determined under Chapter Four, Part A (Criminal History); or (B) criminal history Category V.

(b)      In any case in which the defendant's instant offense of conviction is a covered sex crime, neither §4B1.1 nor subsection (a) of this guideline applies, and the defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct:

(1)       The offense level shall be 5 plus the offense level determined under Chapters Two and Three.  However, if the resulting offense level is less than level 22, the offense level shall be level 22, decreased by the number of levels corresponding to any applicable adjustment from §3E1.1.

(2)       The criminal history category shall be the criminal history category determined under Chapter Four, Part A.

 

Commentary

Application Notes:

1.      Definition.—For purposes of this guideline, "minor" means (A) an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years; (B) an individual, whether fictitious or not, who a law enforcement officer represented to a participant (i) had not attained the age of 18 years; and (ii) could be provided for the purposes of engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (C) an undercover law enforcement officer who represented to a participant that the officer had not attained the age of 18 years.

2.      Covered Sex Crime as Instant Offense of Conviction.—For purposes of this guideline, the instant offense of conviction must be a covered sex crime, i.e.: (A) an offense, perpetrated against a minor, under (i) chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code; (ii) chapter 110 of such title, not including trafficking in, receipt of, or possession of, child pornography, or a recordkeeping offense; (iii) chapter 117 of such title, not including transmitting information about a minor or filing a factual statement about an alien individual; or (iv) 18 U.S.C. § 1591; or (B) an attempt or a conspiracy to commit any offense described in subdivisions (A)(i) through (iv) of this note.

3.      Application of Subsection (a).—

(A)    Definitions.—For purposes of subsection (a):

(i)     "Offense statutory maximum" means the maximum term of imprisonment authorized for the instant offense of conviction that is a covered sex crime, including any increase in that maximum term under a sentencing enhancement provision (such as a sentencing enhancement provision contained in 18 U.S.C. § 2247(a) or § 2426(a)) that applies to that covered sex crime because of the defendant's prior criminal record.

(ii)    "Sex offense conviction" (I) means any offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 2426(b)(1)(A) or (B), if the offense was perpetrated against a minor; and (II) does not include trafficking in, receipt of, or possession of, child pornography.  "Child pornography" has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8).

(B)    Determination of Offense Statutory Maximum in the Case of Multiple Counts of Conviction.—In a case in which more than one count of the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is a covered sex crime, the court shall use the maximum authorized term of imprisonment for the count that has the greatest offense statutory maximum, for purposes of determining the offense statutory maximum under subsection (a).

4.      Application of Subsection (b).—

(A)    Definition.—For purposes of subsection (b), "prohibited sexual conduct" means any of the following: (i) any offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 2426(b)(1)(A) or (B); (ii) the production of child pornography; or (iii) trafficking in child pornography only if, prior to the commission of the instant offense of conviction, the defendant sustained a felony conviction for that trafficking in child pornography.  It does not include receipt or possession of child pornography.  "Child pornography" has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8).

(B)    Determination of Pattern of Activity.—

(i)     In General.—For purposes of subsection (b), the defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct if on at least two separate occasions, the defendant engaged in prohibited sexual conduct with a minor.

(ii)    Occasion of Prohibited Sexual Conduct.—An occasion of prohibited sexual conduct may be considered for purposes of subsection (b) without regard to whether the occasion (I) occurred during the course of the instant offense; or (II) resulted in a conviction for the conduct that occurred on that occasion.

5.      Treatment and Monitoring.—Treatment and monitoring are important tools for supervising offenders and should be considered as special conditions of any term of probation or supervised release that is imposed.

Background:  This guideline applies to offenders whose instant offense of conviction is a sex offense committed against a minor and who present a continuing danger to the public.  The relevant criminal provisions provide for increased statutory maximum penalties for repeat sex offenders and make those increased statutory maximum penalties available if the defendant previously was convicted of any of several federal and state sex offenses (see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2247, 2426).  In addition, section 632 of Public Law 102–141 and section 505 of Public Law 105–314 directed the Commission to ensure lengthy incarceration for offenders who engage in a pattern of activity involving the sexual abuse or exploitation of minors.

Section 401(i)(1)(A) of Public Law 108–21 directly amended Application Note 4(b)(i), effective April 30, 2003.

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 2001 (amendment 615).  Amended effective April 30, 2003 (amendment 649); November 1, 2003 (amendment 661); November 1, 2007 (amendment 701); November 1, 2025 (amendment 835).

 

PART C – ADJUSTMENT FOR CERTAIN ZERO-POINT OFFENDERS

 
 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 320 cases (116 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: United States v. Broxmeyer, 699 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2012).
United States v. Soumya Rudra (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 5×
United States v. David Lynn Vannelli (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 5×
United States v. Dustin Newsome (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 3×
Jansen (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 3×
Rippy (N.D. Ind. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Derek Hahn (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jeffrey Gray (8th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
Glasper (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Garcia (D.N.M. 2026).
United States v. Baxter (1st Cir. 2026).
United States v. Anthony Red Elk, 132 F.4th 1100 (8th Cir. 2025). · cites it 5×
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(1) — 1 case
United States v. Riccardi, 405 F.3d 852 (10th Cir. 2005).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(B)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Ralph Herman Fox, Jr., 926 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2019).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a) — 35 cases
United States v. Aaron Wikkerink, 841 F.3d 327 (5th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Poynter, 495 F.3d 349 (6th Cir. 2007).
United States v. William Nielsen, 694 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2012).
United States v. William Babcock, 753 F.3d 587 (6th Cir. 2014).
United States v. William Dahl, 833 F.3d 345 (3rd Cir. 2016).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(1) — 3 cases
Rutherford v. United States (E.D. Tenn. 2021).
United States v. Carl Mitchell Hooper, 338 F. App'x 866 (11th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Kruse, 618 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2009).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(2) — 7 cases
United States v. Michael Johnson, 451 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Arnold Maurice Mathis, 767 F.3d 1264 (11th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Roy Joey, 845 F.3d 1291 (9th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Joseph Furey Lusk, 119 F.4th 815 (11th Cir. 2024).
Rutherford v. United States (E.D. Tenn. 2021).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(l) — 2 cases
United States v. Samuel Darryl Matthews, 279 F. App'x 956 (11th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Kruse, 618 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2009).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
United States v. Kruse, 618 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2009).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(a)(l)(B)(i) — 1 case
United States v. Kruse, 618 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2009).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(b) — 98 cases
United States v. Anthony Phillips, 431 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2005).
United States v. Broxmeyer, 699 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2012).
United States v. Cerno, 529 F.3d 926 (10th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Richard Haas, 986 F.3d 467 (4th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Randall Hollon, 948 F.3d 753 (6th Cir. 2020).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(b)(1) — 107 cases
United States v. Broxmeyer, 699 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2012).
United States v. Jeffrey Boone, Jr., 97 F.4th 1331 (11th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Cifuentes-Lopez, 40 F.4th 1215 (10th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Rivera-Morales, 961 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2020).
United States v. Michael Begin, 696 F.3d 405 (3rd Cir. 2012).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(b)(i) — 3 cases
United States v. William T. Carter, 490 F.3d 641 (8th Cir. 2007).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(b)(l) — 44 cases
United States v. Broxmeyer, 699 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2012).
United States v. Lawrence Ward, 732 F.3d 175 (3rd Cir. 2013).
United States v. Michael Begin, 696 F.3d 405 (3rd Cir. 2012).
United States v. Sarras, 575 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 2009).
United States v. William T. Carter, 490 F.3d 641 (8th Cir. 2007).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.5(c)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Brown, 204 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.