U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4

Term of Imprisonment—Probation

Read at: USSCussc.gov CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§7B1.4.     Term of Imprisonment—Probation (Policy Statement)

(a)       The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation is set forth in the following table:

Probation Revocation Table
(in months of imprisonment)

  

Criminal History Category*

Grade of Violation IIIIIIIVVVI
 
Grade C 3–94–105–11 6–127–138–14
 
Grade B 4–10 6–128–1412–1818–2421–27
 
Grade A 12–1815–2118–2424–3030–3733–41
 

*The criminal history category is the category applicable at the time the defendant originally was sentenced to a term of probation.

(b)      Provided, that—

(1)       Where the statutorily authorized maximum term of imprisonment that is imposable upon revocation is less than the minimum of the applicable range, the statutorily authorized maximum term shall be substituted for the applicable range; and

(2)       Where the minimum term of imprisonment required by statute, if any, is greater than the maximum of the applicable range, the minimum term of imprisonment required by statute shall be substituted for the applicable range.

(3)       In any other case, the sentence upon revocation may be imposed at any point within the applicable range, provided that the sentence—

(A)       is not greater than the maximum term of imprisonment authorized by statute; and

(B)       is not less than any minimum term of imprisonment required by statute.

 

Commentary

Application Notes:

1.      The criminal history category to be used in determining the applicable range of imprisonment in the Probation Revocation Table is the category determined at the time the defendant originally was sentenced to the term of probation. The criminal history category is not to be recalculated because the ranges set forth in the Probation Revocation Table have been designed to take into account that the defendant violated probation. Example: A defendant, who was originally sentenced in 2022, was determined to have a criminal history category of II due in part to having committed the offense "while under any criminal justice sentence." See §4A1.1(d) (Criminal History Category) (Nov. 2021). For purposes of determining the applicable range of imprisonment in the Probation Revocation Table, the defendant’s criminal history category is category II, regardless of whether the defendant’s criminal history category would be reduced for other purposes based on the retroactive application of Part A of Amendment 821 pursuant to §1B1.10 (Reduction of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended Guideline Range (Policy Statement)). See USSG App. C, Amendment 825 (effective November 1, 2023).

In the rare case in which no criminal history category was determined when the defendant originally was sentenced to the term of probation being revoked, the court shall determine the criminal history category that would have been applicable at the time the defendant originally was sentenced to the term of probation. (See the criminal history provisions of §§4A1.1–4B1.4.)

2.      Upon a finding that a defendant violated a condition of probation by being in possession of a controlled substance or firearm or by refusing to comply with a condition requiring drug testing, the court is required to revoke probation and impose a sentence that includes a term of imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 3565(b).

3.      In the case of a defendant who fails a drug test, the court shall consider whether the availability of appropriate substance abuse programs, or a defendant's current or past participation in such programs, warrants an exception from the requirement of mandatory revocation and imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3565(b). 18 U.S.C. § 3563(a).

Historical Note:  Effective November 1, 1990 (amendment 362); November 1, 1995 (amendment 533); November 1, 2010 (amendment 747); November 1, 2025 (amendments 835 and 836).


 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,490 cases (173 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: United States v. Joseph Schwegel, 126 F.3d 551 (3rd Cir. 1997).
United States v. Grant (5th Cir. 2026). · cites it 4×
United States v. Owens (2d Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Naeem Jones (4th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Camillo (1st Cir. 2026).
United States v. Ball (5th Cir. 2026).
United States v. Bender (D.D.C. 2026).
United States v. Anthony Brookins, 132 F.4th 659 (3rd Cir. 2025).
United States v. Roger Snake, 140 F.4th 379 (7th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rhasheel Charles (11th Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(1)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Thorne, 66 F. Supp. 3d 129 (D.D.C. 2014).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(a) — 784 cases
United States v. Verkhoglyad, 516 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008).
United States v. Desrick Warren, 720 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Mary A. Kirby, 418 F.3d 621 (6th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Brooks, 889 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2018).
United States v. Mark Keith White, 416 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2005).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(a)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Tomonta Simmons, 917 F.3d 312 (4th Cir. 2019).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(a)(2) — 16 cases
United States v. Trung Dang, 907 F.3d 561 (8th Cir. 2018).
United States v. Cates, 613 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Gregory Virgil Fallin, 946 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Thomas Dennis, 35 F.4th 1116 (8th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Donald Jessie, 656 F. App'x 97 (6th Cir. 2016).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(a)(l) — 4 cases
United States v. John Jeffery Carr, 573 F. App'x 840 (11th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Michael Leggett, 320 F. App'x 381 (6th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Marcus Henry, 355 F. App'x 75 (7th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Ernst, 223 F. App'x 173 (3rd Cir. 2007).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(b) — 4 cases
United States v. Antwan Webster, 426 F. App'x 406 (6th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Adams, 66 F. App'x 554 (6th Cir. 2003).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(b)(1) — 20 cases
United States v. Tomonta Simmons, 917 F.3d 312 (4th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Erick Gibbs, 897 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2018).
United States v. Jackie Busey, 11 F.4th 664 (8th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Elmarries Harris, 112 F.4th 624 (8th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Collins (10th Cir. 2017).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(b)(2) — 9 cases
United States v. Darrell Baclaan, 948 F.2d 628 (9th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Harold Davis, 53 F.3d 638 (4th Cir. 1995).
United States v. John William Forrester, 19 F.3d 482 (9th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Wiley Hill, Jr., 48 F.3d 228 (7th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Roger D. Lewis, 998 F.2d 497 (7th Cir. 1993).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(b)(3)(A) — 8 cases
United States v. Darrell Tinsley, 334 F. App'x 296 (11th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Cotha Grant (3rd Cir. 2023).
United States v. Webb, 559 F. App'x 704 (10th Cir. 2014).
— U.S.S.G. §7B1.4(b)(l) — 6 cases
United States v. Labenz Turner, 572 F. App'x 771 (11th Cir. 2014).
United States v. McAllister, 508 F. App'x 703 (10th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Lee, 16 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2001).
United States v. John Ellis, 577 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Cannon, Daniel P., 253 F. App'x 590 (7th Cir. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.