Sentencing Guidelines » Chapter 8

U.S.S.G. § 8C2.3

Offense Level

Read at: USSCussc.gov CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)       For each count covered by §8C2.1 (Applicability of Fine Guidelines), use the applicable Chapter Two guideline to determine the base offense level and apply, in the order listed, any appropriate adjustments contained in that guideline.

(b)      Where there is more than one such count, apply Chapter Three, Part D (Multiple Counts) to determine the combined offense level.

 

Commentary

Application Notes:

1.      In determining the offense level under this section, "defendant," as used in Chapter Two, includes any agent of the organization for whose conduct the organization is criminally responsible.

2.      In determining the offense level under this section, apply the provisions of §§1B1.2 through 1B1.8.  Do not apply the adjustments in Chapter Three, Parts A (Victim-Related Adjustments), B (Role in the Offense), C (Obstruction and Related Adjustments), E (Acceptance of Responsibility), and F (Early Disposition Programs).

Historical Note:  Effective November 1, 1991 (amendment 422).  Amended effective November 1, 2011 (amendment 758); November 1, 2025 (amendment 836).


 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–1998 · leading case: United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 147 F.3d 250 (3rd Cir. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 147 F.3d 250 (3rd Cir. 1998). “The District Court’s Calculation of the Applicable Guideline Fine Range for Count 10 Electrodyne argues the district court incorrectly assessed the total loss figure used to determine the base fine pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 8C2.3 and § 8C2.4. More specifically, the court allegedly…”
United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 28 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D.N.J. 1998). “" U.S.S.G. § 8C2.3(a). In the instant matter, Section 2F1.”
— U.S.S.G. §8C2.3(a) — 1 case
United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 28 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D.N.J. 1998). “" U.S.S.G. § 8C2.3(a). In the instant matter, Section 2F1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.