Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (2026)

Enforcement of ordinances - Remedies - Applicability of provisions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 940, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 5/15/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 474, s 2, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 474, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1935, ch. 44, § 6; C. Supp. 1950, § 3407.6; Acts 1973, ch. 279, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 13-708; Acts 1988, ch. 539, § 1; 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 2004, ch. 730, § 1; 2004, ch. 775, § 1; 2007 , ch. 141, §§ 1, 2; 2008 , ch. 1091, § 1; 2010 , ch. 936, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012).
Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 104× “(c) Industrial, commercial or other business establishments in operation and permitted to operate under zoning regulations or exceptions thereto in effect immediately preceding a change in zoning shall be allowed to expand operations and construct additional facilities which…”
421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 35× “§ 13-7-208(c) authorizes a property owner continuing to operate its business under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (b) “to expand operations and construct additional facilities which involve an actual continuation and expansion of the activities of the industry or business which were…”
SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson City, 363 S.W.3d 467 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 32× “” Thus, the pivotal question in this case is whether the combined effect of Jefferson City’s fireworks ordinance and its decision to annex the land on which SNPCO’s business is located is tantamount to a “zoning restriction” or “zoning change” for the purpose of- Tenn.”
Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 17× “— Notwithstanding the provisions of § 13-7-208 or any other law to the contrary, a heliport operating as of April 23, 1992, that is in violation of § 42-8-102(a) is declared a public nuisance and shall be abated, removed or changed to conform with this chapter by July 1, 1994.”
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. City of Hendersonville, 171 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 49× “1978) (stating that a business does not have to be a fee owner of the subject land, but it may be a lessee and still qualify for protection under Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-208).”
Custom Land Dev., Inc. v. Town of Coopertown, 168 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 36× “On appeal, Custom acknowledges that the General Assembly in T.C.A. § 13-7-208 granted municipalities the power to regulate land use within their boundaries; however, it notes that a municipality’s exercise of this regulatory power must not conflict with state law.”
Coe v. City of Sevierville, 21 S.W.3d 237 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 28× “Ruth Coe (“Plaintiff’) filed this complaint seeking an order from the Sevier County Chancery Court directing the City of Sevierville (“Defendant”) to issue a permit for her to demolish and reconstruct an outdoor advertising sign on her property, pursuant to T.C.A. § 13-7-208.…”
Outdoor West of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Johnson City, 39 S.W.3d 131 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 31× “§ 13-7-208(c), which provides: (c) Industrial, commercial or other business establishments in operation and permitted to operate under zoning regulations or exceptions thereto in effect immediately preceding a change in zoning shall be allowed to expand operations and construct…”
Smith Cnty. Reg'l Plan. Comm'n v. Hiwassee Vill. Mobile Home Park, LLC, 304 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 17× “ANALYSIS Application of Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-208 Counties obtain their power to enact zoning ordinances and otherwise regulate the use of land by delegation from the state.”
Rives v. City of Clarksville, 618 S.W.2d 502 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 18× “The first issue raised by plaintiff is: “Did the enforcement of the Clarksville zoning ordinance against plaintiff violate T.C.A. § 13-7-208?” That portion of T.C.A.”
Chadwell v. Knox Cnty., 980 S.W.2d 378 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 14× “No facts nor legal authority have been called to our attention which demonstrate that the landfill was being used illegally at the time of the enactment of T.C.A. § 13-7-208 or the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.”
Abbington Ctr., LLC v. Town of Collierville, 393 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 16× “in accordance with the controlling Tennessee Statute — Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 , et seq.” The Town timely appealed.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(B)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(a)(2) — 5 cases
Lee Simmons v. City of Lexington, 11 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(b) — 12 cases
Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44 (Tenn. 1997). “— Notwithstanding the provisions of § 13-7-208 or any other law to the contrary, a heliport operating as of April 23, 1992, that is in violation of § 42-8-102(a) is declared a public nuisance and shall be abated, removed or changed to conform with this chapter by July 1, 1994.”
Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012). “(c) Industrial, commercial or other business establishments in operation and permitted to operate under zoning regulations or exceptions thereto in effect immediately preceding a change in zoning shall be allowed to expand operations and construct additional facilities which…”
SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson City, 363 S.W.3d 467 (Tenn. 2012). “” Thus, the pivotal question in this case is whether the combined effect of Jefferson City’s fireworks ordinance and its decision to annex the land on which SNPCO’s business is located is tantamount to a “zoning restriction” or “zoning change” for the purpose of- Tenn.”
Chadwell v. Knox Cnty., 980 S.W.2d 378 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “No facts nor legal authority have been called to our attention which demonstrate that the landfill was being used illegally at the time of the enactment of T.C.A. § 13-7-208 or the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.”
421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 13-7-208(c) authorizes a property owner continuing to operate its business under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (b) “to expand operations and construct additional facilities which involve an actual continuation and expansion of the activities of the industry or business which were…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(b)(1) — 5 cases
SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson City, 363 S.W.3d 467 (Tenn. 2012). “” Thus, the pivotal question in this case is whether the combined effect of Jefferson City’s fireworks ordinance and its decision to annex the land on which SNPCO’s business is located is tantamount to a “zoning restriction” or “zoning change” for the purpose of- Tenn.”
Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012). “(c) Industrial, commercial or other business establishments in operation and permitted to operate under zoning regulations or exceptions thereto in effect immediately preceding a change in zoning shall be allowed to expand operations and construct additional facilities which…”
Smith Cnty. Reg'l Plan. Comm'n v. Hiwassee Vill. Mobile Home Park, LLC, 304 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2010). “ANALYSIS Application of Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-208 Counties obtain their power to enact zoning ordinances and otherwise regulate the use of land by delegation from the state.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(b)(2) — 1 case
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. Murfreesboro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 336 S.W.3d 226 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(b)(l) — 4 cases
SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson City, 363 S.W.3d 467 (Tenn. 2012). “” Thus, the pivotal question in this case is whether the combined effect of Jefferson City’s fireworks ordinance and its decision to annex the land on which SNPCO’s business is located is tantamount to a “zoning restriction” or “zoning change” for the purpose of- Tenn.”
Smith Cnty. Reg'l Plan. Comm'n v. Hiwassee Vill. Mobile Home Park, LLC, 304 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2010). “ANALYSIS Application of Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-208 Counties obtain their power to enact zoning ordinances and otherwise regulate the use of land by delegation from the state.”
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. City of Hendersonville, 171 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “1978) (stating that a business does not have to be a fee owner of the subject land, but it may be a lessee and still qualify for protection under Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-208).”
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. Murfreesboro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 336 S.W.3d 226 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(c) — 7 cases
Moore v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 205 S.W.3d 429 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Outdoor West of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Johnson City, 39 S.W.3d 131 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 13-7-208(c), which provides: (c) Industrial, commercial or other business establishments in operation and permitted to operate under zoning regulations or exceptions thereto in effect immediately preceding a change in zoning shall be allowed to expand operations and construct…”
421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 13-7-208(c) authorizes a property owner continuing to operate its business under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (b) “to expand operations and construct additional facilities which involve an actual continuation and expansion of the activities of the industry or business which were…”
Lafferty v. City of Winchester, 46 S.W.3d 752 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. Murfreesboro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 336 S.W.3d 226 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(d) — 6 cases
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. City of Hendersonville, 171 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “1978) (stating that a business does not have to be a fee owner of the subject land, but it may be a lessee and still qualify for protection under Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-208).”
Custom Land Dev., Inc. v. Town of Coopertown, 168 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “On appeal, Custom acknowledges that the General Assembly in T.C.A. § 13-7-208 granted municipalities the power to regulate land use within their boundaries; however, it notes that a municipality’s exercise of this regulatory power must not conflict with state law.”
421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 13-7-208(c) authorizes a property owner continuing to operate its business under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (b) “to expand operations and construct additional facilities which involve an actual continuation and expansion of the activities of the industry or business which were…”
Lamar Advert. of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Knoxville, 905 S.W.2d 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. Murfreesboro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 336 S.W.3d 226 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(e) — 2 cases
421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 13-7-208(c) authorizes a property owner continuing to operate its business under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 (b) “to expand operations and construct additional facilities which involve an actual continuation and expansion of the activities of the industry or business which were…”
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. City of Hendersonville, 171 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “1978) (stating that a business does not have to be a fee owner of the subject land, but it may be a lessee and still qualify for protection under Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-208).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208(g) — 4 cases
Custom Land Dev., Inc. v. Town of Coopertown, 168 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “On appeal, Custom acknowledges that the General Assembly in T.C.A. § 13-7-208 granted municipalities the power to regulate land use within their boundaries; however, it notes that a municipality’s exercise of this regulatory power must not conflict with state law.”
Smith Cnty. Reg'l Plan. Comm'n v. Hiwassee Vill. Mobile Home Park, LLC, 304 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2010). “ANALYSIS Application of Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-208 Counties obtain their power to enact zoning ordinances and otherwise regulate the use of land by delegation from the state.”
Gary Finley v. Marshall Cnty. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.