Prior to the establishment of any historic district or zone, the historic zoning commission or the regional historic zoning commission also shall adopt for each such proposed district or zone a set of review guidelines, which it will apply in ruling upon the granting or denial of a certificate of appropriateness as provided for in this part. Such review guidelines shall be consistent with the purposes of this part and with regulations and standards adopted by the secretary of the interior pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 ( 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq.), applicable to the construction, alteration, rehabilitation, relocation or demolition of any building, structure or other improvement situated within a historic district which has been certified by the secretary of the interior as a registered historic district. Reasonable public notice and opportunity for public comment, by public hearing or otherwise, shall be required before the historic zoning commission or the regional historic zoning commission adopts any such review guidelines.
Acts 1982, ch. 814, § 1; 1987, ch. 40, § 3; 1989, ch. 422, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cherokee Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville, 152 S.W.3d 466 (Tenn. 2004).
· cites it 4× “*476 Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-406. Once a historic district or zone is established, a local governing body may “regulate the construction, repair, alteration, rehabilitation, relocation and demolition of any building or other structure which is located or is proposed to be located…”
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Hudson, 148 S.W.3d 907 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 3× “Hudson next argues that the historic designation of the Woodland-in-Waverly district and its applicable review guidelines are not enforceable because their adoption did not comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-406 (1999). This section provides that “[pjrior to the establishment of…”
Johnston v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 320 S.W.3d 299 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 13-7-406 (1999). 11 . Review of a common law writ of certiorari is normally confined to the administrative record: [N]ew or additional evidence may be received by the reviewing court on the issue of whether the lower tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction or in some manner…”
Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Margaret Hudson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 3× “Hudson next argues that the historic designation of the Woodland-in-Waverly district and its applicable review guidelines are not enforceable because their adoption did not comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-406 (1999). This section provides that “[p]rior to the establishment of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.