Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (2026)

General powers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1858, § 4125 (deriv. Acts 1794, ch. 1, § 19; 1801, ch. 7, § 4; 1805, ch. 66, §§ 4, 6; 1837-1838, ch. 102, § 1; 1843-1844, ch. 112, § 1; 1847-1848, ch. 55, § 15; 1849-1850, ch. 103, § 1; 1851-1852, ch. 181, § 3); Shan., § 5937; Code 1932, § 10138; Acts 1959, ch. 109, § 2; 1961, ch. 138, § 1; 1965, ch. 114, § 1; 1967, ch. 276, § 1; 1968, ch. 635, § 2; 1969, ch. 44, § 2; 1973, ch. 88, § 2; 1973, ch. 355, § 2; 1974, ch. 432, § 2; impl. am. 1979, ch. 68, §§ 2, 3; modified; T.C.A., § 19-202; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 16-1104; Acts 1993, ch. 241, § 9.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Benson v. Herbst, 240 S.W.3d 235 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Benson v. Herbst, 240 S.W.3d 235 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Glanton did not have the option to ask that the case be transferred to circuit court.”
Ware v. Meharry Med. Coll., 898 S.W.2d 181 (Tenn. 1995). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 16-15-401(c) (Supp.1993); Tenn.”
State v. McClintock, 732 S.W.2d 268 (Tenn. 1987). “§ 40-l-109(a) provides in part: “In addition to the jurisdiction in criminal cases as conferred in §§ 16-15-401, 16-15-501, the court of general sessions is hereby vested with jurisdiction to try and *270 determine and render final judgment in all misdemeanor cases brought…”
Lewis v. Metro. Gen. Sessions Court for Nashville, 949 S.W.2d 696 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “— (a) In addition to the jurisdiction in criminal cases as conferred in §§ 16-15-401, 16-15-501, the court of general sessions is hereby vested with jurisdiction to try and determine and render final judgment in all misdemeanor cases brought before the court by warrant or…”
Shontel S. Ross v. Deidra L. Grandberry, M.D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “We have interpreted Tennessee Code Annotated section 16-15-401 to require action by the general sessions court judge–not to require the consent of plaintiffs.”
Baxter Bailey Investments LLC v. APL Ltd. Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 8× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (a)(8). APL argues, in its brief to this Court, that this provision affords the general sessions court the authority to issue discretionary awards, including sanctions as in this case.”
Jontae A. Fischiettie v. Econo Auto Painting of West Tennessee, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (2). Tennessee law also provides that a defendant may confess judgment for fines and costs in a criminal matter.”
Mark Elliott v. Dave Wright (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 , did the Knox County Circuit Court err when it effectively removed the Knox County General Sessions Court’s injunctive powers and undermined the legislative intent of injunctive relief? 3.”
Metro. Gov't Of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Layton Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 16-15-401(b) (General sessions court judges “have the same authority as circuit court judges or chancellors to grant .”
State v. Buford (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 16-15-401 , -501, 40-1-109 defines the jurisdiction of general sessions courts which includes the authority to try misdemeanor cases.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(2) — 1 case
Jontae A. Fischiettie v. Econo Auto Painting of West Tennessee, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (2). Tennessee law also provides that a defendant may confess judgment for fines and costs in a criminal matter.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(a) — 2 cases
Shontel S. Ross v. Deidra L. Grandberry, M.D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “We have interpreted Tennessee Code Annotated section 16-15-401 to require action by the general sessions court judge–not to require the consent of plaintiffs.”
Baxter Bailey Investments LLC v. APL Ltd. Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (a)(8). APL argues, in its brief to this Court, that this provision affords the general sessions court the authority to issue discretionary awards, including sanctions as in this case.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(a)(2) — 1 case
Benson v. Herbst, 240 S.W.3d 235 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “Glanton did not have the option to ask that the case be transferred to circuit court.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(a)(8) — 1 case
Baxter Bailey Investments LLC v. APL Ltd. Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401 (a)(8). APL argues, in its brief to this Court, that this provision affords the general sessions court the authority to issue discretionary awards, including sanctions as in this case.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(b) — 1 case
Metro. Gov't Of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Layton Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 16-15-401(b) (General sessions court judges “have the same authority as circuit court judges or chancellors to grant .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-15-401(c) — 1 case
Ware v. Meharry Med. Coll., 898 S.W.2d 181 (Tenn. 1995). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 16-15-401(c) (Supp.1993); Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.