Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-107 (2026)

Content of statements - Closing out accounts - Reporting of in-kind contributions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1087, s 8, eff. 1/16/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1087, s 7, eff. 1/16/2023.

Acts 1980, ch. 861, § 8; 1984, ch. 683, § 6; 1986, ch. 780, § 2; 1989, ch. 585, §§ 15, 33; 1990, ch. 943, § 3; 1991, ch. 519, §§ 5, 6; 1995, ch. 531, §§ 14, 15; 1997 , ch. 410, §§ 3, 4; 2006 (1st Ex. Sess.), ch. 1, § 4; 2009 , ch. 556, §§ 2-4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Bemis Pentecostal Church v. State, 731 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn. 1987).
Bemis Pentecostal Church v. State, 731 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 8× “T.C.A. § 2-10-107 establishes the content of the required statements.”
ProtectMarriage. Com v. Bowen, 599 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (E.D. Cal. 2009). “Tennessee: Tenn.Code Ann. § 2-10-107(a)(2)(A)(I). *1222 Vermont: Vt.”
Tennesseans For Sensible Election Laws v. Tennessee Bureau Of Ethics & Campaign Fin., Registry Of Election Fin., & Davidson Cnty. Dist. Attorney Gen. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-107 (a)(2)(A)(i) (requiring “a list of all the contributions received, including the full name, complete address, occupation, and employer of each person who contributed a total amount of more than one hundred dollars ($100) during the period for which…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-107(a)(2) — 1 case
Bemis Pentecostal Church v. State, 731 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn. 1987). “T.C.A. § 2-10-107 establishes the content of the required statements.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-107(a)(2)(A)(I) — 1 case
ProtectMarriage. Com v. Bowen, 599 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (E.D. Cal. 2009). “Tennessee: Tenn.Code Ann. § 2-10-107(a)(2)(A)(I). *1222 Vermont: Vt.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-107(a)(l) — 1 case
Bemis Pentecostal Church v. State, 731 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn. 1987). “T.C.A. § 2-10-107 establishes the content of the required statements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.