Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (2026)

Suffrage for persons convicted of infamous crimes

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following provisions shall govern the exercise of the right of suffrage for those persons convicted of an infamous crime:

Acts 1981, ch. 345, §§ 2, 8; 1983, ch. 207, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Wesley v. Collins, 605 F. Supp. 802 (M.D. Tenn. 1985).
Wesley v. Collins, 605 F. Supp. 802 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 4× “*804 Facts Two plaintiffs bring suit in this Court alleging that the Tennessee Voting Rights Act of 1981, T.C.A. § 2-19-143 (1983 Supp.), denies them rights secured under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and under the federal Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1982, 42 U.”
Tenn.Conf. of the NAACP v. William Lee, 105 F.4th 888 (6th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (2)–(3); Falls, 673 S.”
Gaskin v. Collins, 661 S.W.2d 865 (Tenn. 1983). “§ 2 — 2—139(d) and § 2-19-143(4), is declared to be unconstitutional in that it violates Article I § 5 of the Tennessee Constitution.”
Tenn. State Conf. of the NAACP v. William Lee, 139 F.4th 557 (6th Cir. 2025). “2023); Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 2-19-143 (2)–(3), 40-20-112 (2024).”
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (Dissent) (Tenn. 2023). · cites it 34× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3) (2014) (emphases added).”
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 22× “Falls filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that his full rights of citizenship had been restored by the Governor of Virginia, as required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3), and therefore, he was entitled to vote in Tennessee.”
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (2023). · cites it 6× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3) (2014). Respondents, three public employees sued in their official capacity, countered that Mr.”
State of Tennessee v. Roscoe Dixon (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “” See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (providing that those convicted of infamous crimes in this state or under federal law shall not be permitted to vote unless such person has been pardoned by the appropriate authority or “the person’s full rights of citizenship have otherwise…”
John N. Moffitt v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “” See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (providing that those convicted of infamous crimes in this state or under federal law shall not be permitted to vote unless such person has been pardoned by the appropriate authority or “the person’s full rights of citizenship have otherwise…”
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “This subsection (b) shall apply even if the person's citizenship rights have been restored, but shall not be construed as limiting the restoration of any other citizenship rights, including the right of suffrage provided for in § 2-2-139, § 2-19-143, or § 40-29-105. Accordingly,…”
Wilson v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “§ 2-2- 139(d) and § 2-19-143(4), is declared to be unconstitutional in that it violates Article I, § 5 of the Tennessee Constitution.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143(1) — 1 case
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (Dissent) (Tenn. 2023). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3) (2014) (emphases added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143(2) — 1 case
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (Dissent) (Tenn. 2023). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3) (2014) (emphases added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143(3) — 1 case
Ernest Falls v. Mark Goins (Dissent) (Tenn. 2023). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143 (3) (2014) (emphases added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-19-143(4) — 2 cases
Gaskin v. Collins, 661 S.W.2d 865 (Tenn. 1983). “§ 2 — 2—139(d) and § 2-19-143(4), is declared to be unconstitutional in that it violates Article I § 5 of the Tennessee Constitution.”
Wilson v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “§ 2-2- 139(d) and § 2-19-143(4), is declared to be unconstitutional in that it violates Article I, § 5 of the Tennessee Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.