Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122 (2026)

Principles for determination of residence - Factors involved

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1972, ch. 740, § 1; 1973, ch. 327, § 3; T.C.A., § 2-222; Acts 1989, ch. 590, § 11; 1994, ch. 859, § 13; 1994, ch. 919, § 19; 2005, ch. 163, §§ 1, 2; 2008, ch. 939, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985).
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 9× “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
Comm. to Oppose the Annexation of Topside & Louisville Road v. City of Alcoa, 881 S.W.2d 269 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 2× “The Court of Appeals recognized that some of the aggrieved property owners have their dwelling houses upon parcels of land lying partially within the area to be annexed and that the determination of a persons residence under our election code is provided in T.C.A. §…”
William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. Pemberton (Tenn. 2017). · cites it 2× “At the beginning of the hearing, the Roane County Administrator of Elections, at the request of the chair of the Election Commission, read aloud Tennessee Code Annotated section 2-2-122—the statute that specifies the factors relevant to establishing and determining residency for…”
Jenna Amacher v. City of Tullahoma, Tenn. (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code § 2-2-122(a)(4). That legal test prompted this factual question: Did Amacher intend to move back to the City? On that score, Amacher did “just enough” by trying to build a habitable residence on her lot to “manifest her intent to” live in the City again.”
Thomas Fowler v. Maxine Middlecoff (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “In order to determine Wilson’s residence, we look to T.C.A. § 2-2-122: 2-2-122. Principles for determination of residence - Factors involved.”
Knox Cnty. Election Comm'n v. Shelley Breeding (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “In summary, when the evidence before us is viewed in the light of the state constitutional language – “resident in the county” – and the statutory test for residence found at Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122 (Supp. 2011), we conclude that the evidence does not preponderate against the…”
William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. Pemberton (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Here, the April 28 hearing began with the Commission‟s administrator reading aloud the full text of Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122 (2014), which sets out the principles for determining residency.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(5) — 1 case
Thomas Fowler v. Maxine Middlecoff (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “In order to determine Wilson’s residence, we look to T.C.A. § 2-2-122: 2-2-122. Principles for determination of residence - Factors involved.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(2) — 1 case
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(4) — 2 cases
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
Jenna Amacher v. City of Tullahoma, Tenn. (6th Cir. 2026). “See Tenn. Code § 2-2-122(a)(4). That legal test prompted this factual question: Did Amacher intend to move back to the City? On that score, Amacher did “just enough” by trying to build a habitable residence on her lot to “manifest her intent to” live in the City again.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(5) — 1 case
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(6) — 1 case
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(7) — 1 case
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(a)(l) — 1 case
Comm. to Oppose the Annexation of Topside & Louisville Road v. City of Alcoa, 881 S.W.2d 269 (Tenn. 1994). “The Court of Appeals recognized that some of the aggrieved property owners have their dwelling houses upon parcels of land lying partially within the area to be annexed and that the determination of a persons residence under our election code is provided in T.C.A. §…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-122(b) — 1 case
Tate v. Collins, 622 F. Supp. 1409 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 2-2-122(a)(2) and (3), which state that, “A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place____ A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it his residence. There must be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.