Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (2026)

Alternate nonautomated jury selection method

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2008 , ch. 1159, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1982–2010 · leading case: State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 22× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
State v. Hester, 324 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 8× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(l), (3). This provision is currently codified at Tenn.”
State v. Davidson, 121 S.W.3d 600 (Tenn. 2003). · cites it 8× “Selection of Venire The relevant statutory provisions governing the selection of the jury venire or a special jury venire are established in Tennessee Code Annotation section 22-2-302 and related sections. As relevant to this case, the provisions require the board of jury…”
State v. Thompson, 768 S.W.2d 239 (Tenn. 1989). · cites it 2× “Similarly, the fact that a jury commissioner may not have selected a tentative list of jurors in the presence of other commissioners, see T.C.A. § 22-2-302(a)(l), is not, without more, grounds to quash the venire.”
State v. Farmer, 927 S.W.2d 582 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (1994 Repl.). In this case, the clerk of the Jury Commission of Warren County participated along with the jury commissioners in the selection of the one thousand member jury venire, as well as in the selection of two hundred fifty members of the panel…”
State v. Wiseman, 643 S.W.2d 354 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “TCA § 22-2-302(a)(l) provides that the box will be filled with the names of legally qualified prospective jurors “from each district in the county and in proportion to the population of such districts, as near as may be”.”
State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387 (Tenn. 1989). · cites it 2× “Neither is there any proof in the record concerning the allegation that no record of jurors was kept contrary to the requirements of T.C.A. § 22-2-302. The defendant also raised a number of issues involving the voir dire.”
State v. Bell, 745 S.W.2d 858 (Tenn. 1988). · cites it 2× “TCA § 22-2-302 requires that the Board of Jury Commissioners shall select the names of persons to serve as jurors from a list of names of upright and intelligent persons known for their integrity, fair character and sound judgment who are otherwise legally qualified to serve as…”
State v. Jefferson, 769 S.W.2d 875 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Grand jurors in Tennessee are chosen at random, from a list of qualified potential jurors compiled by jury commissioners: Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302. Selection of names for jury list — Jury book— Jury box — Method of selection in Shelby County.”
State of Tennessee v. Danny Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “” Tennessee Code Annotated section 22-2-302(a)(1) (1994) provides that [t]he board of jury commissioners shall meet in the circuit court clerk’s office at a time fixed by the judge or judges appointing the board, and on the first Monday in the month in which such original…”
State v. Pat Bondurant (Death Penalty) (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (b) and (c)(2) (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(2)(C) — 1 case
State v. Hester, 324 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(l), (3). This provision is currently codified at Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
State v. Davidson, 121 S.W.3d 600 (Tenn. 2003). “Selection of Venire The relevant statutory provisions governing the selection of the jury venire or a special jury venire are established in Tennessee Code Annotation section 22-2-302 and related sections. As relevant to this case, the provisions require the board of jury…”
State of Tennessee v. Danny Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “” Tennessee Code Annotated section 22-2-302(a)(1) (1994) provides that [t]he board of jury commissioners shall meet in the circuit court clerk’s office at a time fixed by the judge or judges appointing the board, and on the first Monday in the month in which such original…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(l) — 4 cases
State v. Hester, 324 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(l), (3). This provision is currently codified at Tenn.”
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
State v. Thompson, 768 S.W.2d 239 (Tenn. 1989). “Similarly, the fact that a jury commissioner may not have selected a tentative list of jurors in the presence of other commissioners, see T.C.A. § 22-2-302(a)(l), is not, without more, grounds to quash the venire.”
State v. Wiseman, 643 S.W.2d 354 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1982). “TCA § 22-2-302(a)(l) provides that the box will be filled with the names of legally qualified prospective jurors “from each district in the county and in proportion to the population of such districts, as near as may be”.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(b) — 1 case
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(b)(1) — 1 case
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(b)(3) — 1 case
State v. Pat Bondurant (Death Penalty) (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (b) and (c)(2) (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(c)(l) — 1 case
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302(d) — 2 cases
State v. Hester, 324 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-302(a)(l), (3). This provision is currently codified at Tenn.”
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 22-2-302 (a)(l). The Defendant further states that, because no well- *733 bound book had been purchased, there was “no method to ensure any jury commissioner seleet[ed] persons for the venire proportionately to the districts of the county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.