Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 24-1-204 (2026)
Communications during crisis intervention
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) As used in this section:
- (1) "Crisis intervention" means a session at which crisis response services are rendered by a critical incident stress management team member or leader prior to, during, or after a crisis or disaster;
- (2) "Crisis response services" means consultation, risk assessment, prevention interventions, referral, and crisis intervention services provided by a critical incident stress management team to individuals affected by crisis or disaster;
- (3) "Critical incident stress management team member or team leader," referred to also as "team member," or "team leader," means an individual specially trained to provide crisis response services as a member or leader of an organized community or local crisis response team that holds membership in a registered critical incident stress management team;
- (4) "Registered team" means a team formally registered with a recognized training agency. A recognized training agency shall include the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation, the National Organization for Victim Assistance, the American Red Cross, the Tennessee Public Safety Network and other such organizations;
- (5) "Training session" means a session providing crisis response training by a qualified trained trainer utilizing the standards established by the accrediting agencies set out in subdivision (a)(4); and
- (6) "Volunteer" means a person who serves and receives no remuneration for services except reimbursement for actual expenses.
- (b) All communications between a team member or team leader providing, and a group participant or person participating in, a crisis intervention shall be considered confidential and no such person shall be required to disclose any such communication unless otherwise required by law or rule of court.
- (c) Except as provided under subsection (d), no person, whether a team member, team leader or group participant, providing or participating in a crisis intervention shall be required to testify or divulge any information obtained solely through such crisis intervention.
- (d) The testimonial privilege established under subsection (c) shall not apply if any of the following are true:
- (1) The communication indicates the existence of a danger to the individual who receives crisis response services or to any other person or persons;
- (2) The communication indicates the existence of past or present child abuse or neglect of the individual, abuse of an adult as defined in title 71, chapter 6 or family violence as defined in title 71, chapter 6, part 2;
- (3) The communication indicates the existence of past or present acts constituting an intentional tort or crime; provided, that the applicable statute of limitation has not expired on the act indicated; or
- (4) All parties involved in the crisis intervention, including the individual or individuals who received crisis response services, expressly waive the privilege and consent to the testimony.
Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 245, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.
Acts 2009 , ch. 332, § 1; 2010 , ch. 618, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1982–2016 · leading case: State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
State v. Stephens, 264 S.W.3d 719 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “See T.C.A. § 24-1-204 (repealed 1991). [[Image here]] We do not believe that Rule 615 affects Smartt’s requirement that the state’s designated person testify first.”
State v. Gonzales, 638 S.W.2d 841 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1982). “” The act “in question” was T.C.A. § 24-1-204 which excludes parties to a suit from the rule of sequestration of witnesses.”
State of Tennessee v. Randall T. Beaty (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “- 25 - Following Smartt, Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-106 was renumbered and became section 24-1-204, which provided: ―Nothing in any section shall be construed to require the parties, or either of them, to be put under the rule, when witnesses in any cause in which the…”
State of Tennessee v. Randall T. Beaty (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “Following Smartt, Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-106 was renumbered and became section 24-1-204, which provided: ―Nothing in any section shall be construed to require the parties, or either of them, to be put under the rule, when witnesses in any cause in which the rule has…”
State of Tennessee v. James Michael Naive (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). “See T.C.A. § 24-1-204 (2000) (repealed Acts 1991, ch.”
State of Tennessee v. Timothy Wright (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 24-1-204 (2000) (repealed Acts 1991, ch.”
State of Tennessee v. Randall T. Beaty (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “- 24 - Following Smartt, Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-106 was renumbered and became section 24-1-204, which provided: ―Nothing in any section shall be construed to require the parties, or either of them, to be put under the rule, when witnesses in any cause in which the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.