Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 (2026)

Method of serving summons

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 160, s 1, eff. 4/18/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 670, Secs.s 1, s 2eff. 4/12/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 160, s 1, Sec.s 2, Secs.s 3, s 4eff. 4/16/2015.

Acts 1869-1870, ch. 64, § 6; Shan., § 5127; Code 1932, § 9282; Acts 1945, ch. 79, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 9282; Acts 1979, ch. 420, §1; 1980, ch. 798, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §23-1615; Acts 1997 , ch. 380, §1; 2010 , ch. 827, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: B & G Constr., Inc. v. Polk, 37 S.W.3d 462 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
B & G Constr., Inc. v. Polk, 37 S.W.3d 462 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 6× “Because the detain-er warrant was served upon an adult found in possession of the premises in question, service of process was effective under T.C.A. § 29-18-115(a) to establish jurisdiction for the original General Sessions Court award of possession in favor of the landlord.”
Lipscomb v. Doe, 32 S.W.3d 840 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 4× “, Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-18-115(a)(4)-(5) (1980) (requiring the plaintiff to make "diligent inquiry" before allowing a person to be unknown so as to dispense with personal service of process in forcible entry and detainer actions); Tenn.”
Gallatin Hous. Auth. v. Talley (In Re Talley), 69 B.R. 219 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1986). “§§ 29-18-115, 117 (1980). The landlord is prohibited in a URLTA county to diminish services such as utilities in an effort to remove a tenant.”
James Scarlett v. AA Props., GP (2020). · cites it 6× “§ 29-18 - 115(e)(2); and 2) whether the General Sessions Court erred by entering default judgment earlier than six days after service of process, requiring Scarlett to appear and defend in violation of the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 (e)(2) as computed by Tenn.”
Apexworks Restoration v. Derek Scott (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 (a)(1) (emphasis added).”
Tommy Burney Homes v. Wayne K. Francis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 governs service of process in forcible entry and detainer actions; § 29-18-115(a)(1) states in pertinent part: In commencing an action under this chapter, summons may be served upon any adult person found in possession of the premises; and service of…”
Outloud! INC. v. Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “On April 1, 2016, approximately two years and eight months after the judgments were entered in general sessions court, Outloud! filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review of the general sessions’ judgments, arguing that Outloud! was not properly served in accordance…”
Nehad Abdelnabi v. Fatma Adel Sekik (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “Relatives attempted to evade service of process but were eventually served by mailing a copy of the amended petition and summons by return receipt registered mail and posting a copy of the summons at three public places in the county pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
Ted H. Lowe, III v. Joseph M. Brown (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 (e) (2012) (providing for service of process of a detainer warrant through posting on the door of the premises combined with mailing via United States Postal Service first class mail in the event that three documented attempts at personal service…”
Scroggins v. Goss (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Scroggins points to three statutes which authorize service by publication in circuit court: Tenn. Code Ann §29-18-115, authorizing service by publication in the instance of forcible entry and detainer; Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115(a) — 1 case
B & G Constr., Inc. v. Polk, 37 S.W.3d 462 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Because the detain-er warrant was served upon an adult found in possession of the premises in question, service of process was effective under T.C.A. § 29-18-115(a) to establish jurisdiction for the original General Sessions Court award of possession in favor of the landlord.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115(a)(1) — 1 case
Tommy Burney Homes v. Wayne K. Francis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115 governs service of process in forcible entry and detainer actions; § 29-18-115(a)(1) states in pertinent part: In commencing an action under this chapter, summons may be served upon any adult person found in possession of the premises; and service of…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115(a)(4) — 1 case
Lipscomb v. Doe, 32 S.W.3d 840 (Tenn. 2000). “, Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-18-115(a)(4)-(5) (1980) (requiring the plaintiff to make "diligent inquiry" before allowing a person to be unknown so as to dispense with personal service of process in forcible entry and detainer actions); Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-18-115(e)(2) — 1 case
Nehad Abdelnabi v. Fatma Adel Sekik (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “Relatives attempted to evade service of process but were eventually served by mailing a copy of the amended petition and summons by return receipt registered mail and posting a copy of the summons at three public places in the county pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.