Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104 (2026)

Claims and awards for fees and expenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 797, s 10, eff. 4/14/2016.

Acts 1984, ch. 495, § 4; 1989, ch. 365, §§2-6; 2010 , ch. 1030, § 11.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006).
State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 8× “Fees incurred by the defendants easily exceed the maximum recovery of $10,000 authorized by Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-37-104. The trial court imposed fines of $1,000 each on Thompson and the LLC for being unregistered by the State for a period of three months.”
Am. Child Care, Inc. v. Dept. of Human Servs., 83 S.W.3d 148 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “The trial court's second conclusion which is not quoted here was in regard to Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-37-104. Tenn.Code Ann.”
Four Seasons Gardening & Landscaping, Inc. v. Crouch, 688 S.W.2d 439 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 8-30-327 permits attorneys fees in civil service appeals; Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-37-104 permits attorneys fees in cases involving erroneous governmental action; and Tenn.”
Bmc Enter., Inc. v. City of Mt. Juliet, 273 S.W.3d 619 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Defendants argue that they were not required to raise this issue on appeal be *628 cause BMC would not be entitled to attorney fees if we reverse the Trial Court’s decision because BMC would no longer be a “prevailing party” entitled to an award of attorney fees pursuant to…”
State of Tennessee v. Tyrome Cameron Ferguson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “For example, the Equal Access to Justice Act permits a court to award up to $10,000 in “reasonable and actual fees and other expenses” to a party prevailing against a state agency under its provisions, “unless the prevailing party is a state agency.”
State v. Travis Thompson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “-11- Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104 (a) and (b) (2000).”
Herbert S. Moncier v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104 (a)(1). The act applies with regard to civil actions brought by a state agency or actions for judicial review pursuant to Tenn.”
Tommy Wright v. The City of Shelbyville Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104 (b)(2). See BMC Enterprises Inc.”
Connie Reguli v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of The Supreme Court of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “§ 4-5-325 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104 ? If not, is the denial of that right a violation of equal protection under the Tennessee and the United States Constitutions? K.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006). “Fees incurred by the defendants easily exceed the maximum recovery of $10,000 authorized by Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-37-104. The trial court imposed fines of $1,000 each on Thompson and the LLC for being unregistered by the State for a period of three months.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-37-104(b)(l) — 1 case
State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006). “Fees incurred by the defendants easily exceed the maximum recovery of $10,000 authorized by Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-37-104. The trial court imposed fines of $1,000 each on Thompson and the LLC for being unregistered by the State for a period of three months.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.