Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-310 (2026)

Initiation of arbitration

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Added by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 319, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: Otha Smith v. Marjorie Smith, 989 S.W.2d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Otha Smith v. Marjorie Smith, 989 S.W.2d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-5-310, 313 and 314. However, the proceeding conducted by the trial court differed in many important respects from an arbitration of the sort which is governed by the Uniform Arbitration Act.”
In Re Gunther, 431 B.R. 307 (6th Cir. BAP 2009). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-311 . In addition, arbitration awards can be modified only for the reasons set forth in Tenn.”
Elizabeth Sams Tuetken v. Lance Edward Tuetken (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-5-310 , 313. Mother contends that the UAA governs and that the statutory circumstances for modification of an award do not apply.”
Donna Woods Hartman v. Patrick Erwin Hartman (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-310 , 313 and 314.”
Otha Smith v. Marjorie Smith (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “The appellant points out that under the Uniform Arbitration Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-301 , et seq., an arbitration award may not be modified or vacated except under circumstances not present here.”
In re: William Gunther, Jr. v. (6th Cir. BAP 2009). “In addition, arbitration awards can be modified only for the reasons set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-314 (a)(1) and (3).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.